Commit d4d6c614 authored by Xin Long's avatar Xin Long Committed by David S. Miller

sctp: remove the typedef sctp_sack_chunk_t

This patch is to remove the typedef sctp_sack_chunk_t, and
replace with struct sctp_sack_chunk in the places where it's
using this typedef.
Signed-off-by: default avatarXin Long <lucien.xin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
parent 78731085
......@@ -381,10 +381,10 @@ struct sctp_sackhdr {
union sctp_sack_variable variable[0];
};
typedef struct sctp_sack_chunk {
struct sctp_sack_chunk {
struct sctp_chunkhdr chunk_hdr;
struct sctp_sackhdr sack_hdr;
} sctp_sack_chunk_t;
};
/* RFC 2960. Section 3.3.5 Heartbeat Request (HEARTBEAT) (4):
......
......@@ -221,7 +221,7 @@ struct sctp_datamsg *sctp_datamsg_from_user(struct sctp_association *asoc,
asoc->outqueue.out_qlen == 0 &&
list_empty(&asoc->outqueue.retransmit) &&
msg_len > max_data)
first_len -= SCTP_PAD4(sizeof(sctp_sack_chunk_t));
first_len -= SCTP_PAD4(sizeof(struct sctp_sack_chunk));
/* Encourage Cookie-ECHO bundling. */
if (asoc->state < SCTP_STATE_COOKIE_ECHOED)
......
......@@ -3194,7 +3194,7 @@ sctp_disposition_t sctp_sf_eat_sack_6_2(struct net *net,
return sctp_sf_pdiscard(net, ep, asoc, type, arg, commands);
/* Make sure that the SACK chunk has a valid length. */
if (!sctp_chunk_length_valid(chunk, sizeof(sctp_sack_chunk_t)))
if (!sctp_chunk_length_valid(chunk, sizeof(struct sctp_sack_chunk)))
return sctp_sf_violation_chunklen(net, ep, asoc, type, arg,
commands);
......@@ -4515,7 +4515,7 @@ static sctp_disposition_t sctp_sf_abort_violation(
* Handle a protocol violation when the chunk length is invalid.
* "Invalid" length is identified as smaller than the minimal length a
* given chunk can be. For example, a SACK chunk has invalid length
* if its length is set to be smaller than the size of sctp_sack_chunk_t.
* if its length is set to be smaller than the size of struct sctp_sack_chunk.
*
* We inform the other end by sending an ABORT with a Protocol Violation
* error code.
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment