Commit d73794d6 authored by Erich Focht's avatar Erich Focht Committed by David Mosberger

[PATCH] Remove global semaphore_lock for ia64, similar to i386 change for 2.5.25

parent a4be0c60
......@@ -15,8 +15,8 @@
* test if they need to do any extra work (up needs to do something
* only if count was negative before the increment operation.
*
* "sleepers" and the contention routine ordering is protected by the
* semaphore spinlock.
* "sleeping" and the contention routine ordering is protected
* by the spinlock in the semaphore's waitqueue head.
*
* Note that these functions are only called when there is contention
* on the lock, and as such all this is the "non-critical" part of the
......@@ -44,40 +44,42 @@ __up (struct semaphore *sem)
wake_up(&sem->wait);
}
static spinlock_t semaphore_lock = SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED;
void
__down (struct semaphore *sem)
{
struct task_struct *tsk = current;
DECLARE_WAITQUEUE(wait, tsk);
unsigned long flags;
tsk->state = TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE;
add_wait_queue_exclusive(&sem->wait, &wait);
spin_lock_irqsave(&sem->wait.lock, flags);
add_wait_queue_exclusive_locked(&sem->wait, &wait);
spin_lock_irq(&semaphore_lock);
sem->sleepers++;
for (;;) {
int sleepers = sem->sleepers;
/*
* Add "everybody else" into it. They aren't
* playing, because we own the spinlock.
* playing, because we own the spinlock in
* the wait_queue_head.
*/
if (!atomic_add_negative(sleepers - 1, &sem->count)) {
sem->sleepers = 0;
break;
}
sem->sleepers = 1; /* us - see -1 above */
spin_unlock_irq(&semaphore_lock);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sem->wait.lock, flags);
schedule();
spin_lock_irqsave(&sem->wait.lock, flags);
tsk->state = TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE;
spin_lock_irq(&semaphore_lock);
}
spin_unlock_irq(&semaphore_lock);
remove_wait_queue(&sem->wait, &wait);
remove_wait_queue_locked(&sem->wait, &wait);
wake_up_locked(&sem->wait);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sem->wait.lock, flags);
tsk->state = TASK_RUNNING;
wake_up(&sem->wait);
}
int
......@@ -86,10 +88,12 @@ __down_interruptible (struct semaphore * sem)
int retval = 0;
struct task_struct *tsk = current;
DECLARE_WAITQUEUE(wait, tsk);
unsigned long flags;
tsk->state = TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE;
add_wait_queue_exclusive(&sem->wait, &wait);
spin_lock_irqsave(&sem->wait.lock, flags);
add_wait_queue_exclusive_locked(&sem->wait, &wait);
spin_lock_irq(&semaphore_lock);
sem->sleepers ++;
for (;;) {
int sleepers = sem->sleepers;
......@@ -110,25 +114,27 @@ __down_interruptible (struct semaphore * sem)
/*
* Add "everybody else" into it. They aren't
* playing, because we own the spinlock. The
* "-1" is because we're still hoping to get
* the lock.
* playing, because we own the spinlock in
* wait_queue_head. The "-1" is because we're
* still hoping to get the semaphore.
*/
if (!atomic_add_negative(sleepers - 1, &sem->count)) {
sem->sleepers = 0;
break;
}
sem->sleepers = 1; /* us - see -1 above */
spin_unlock_irq(&semaphore_lock);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sem->wait.lock, flags);
schedule();
spin_lock_irqsave(&sem->wait.lock, flags);
tsk->state = TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE;
spin_lock_irq(&semaphore_lock);
}
spin_unlock_irq(&semaphore_lock);
remove_wait_queue_locked(&sem->wait, &wait);
wake_up_locked(&sem->wait);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sem->wait.lock, flags);
tsk->state = TASK_RUNNING;
remove_wait_queue(&sem->wait, &wait);
wake_up(&sem->wait);
return retval;
}
......@@ -142,17 +148,19 @@ __down_trylock (struct semaphore *sem)
unsigned long flags;
int sleepers;
spin_lock_irqsave(&semaphore_lock, flags);
spin_lock_irqsave(&sem->wait.lock, flags);
sleepers = sem->sleepers + 1;
sem->sleepers = 0;
/*
* Add "everybody else" and us into it. They aren't
* playing, because we own the spinlock.
* playing, because we own the spinlock in the
* wait_queue_head.
*/
if (!atomic_add_negative(sleepers, &sem->count))
wake_up(&sem->wait);
if (!atomic_add_negative(sleepers, &sem->count)) {
wake_up_locked(&sem->wait);
}
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&semaphore_lock, flags);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sem->wait.lock, flags);
return 1;
}
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment