Commit e4fd493c authored by Josef Bacik's avatar Josef Bacik Committed by David Sterba

Btrfs: fix stale entries in readdir

In fixing the readdir+pagefault deadlock I accidentally introduced a
stale entry regression in readdir.  If we get close to full for the
temporary buffer, and then skip a few delayed deletions, and then try to
add another entry that won't fit, we will emit the entries we found and
retry.  Unfortunately we delete entries from our del_list as we find
them, assuming we won't need them.  However our pos will be with
whatever our last entry was, which could be before the delayed deletions
we skipped, so the next search will add the deleted entries back into
our readdir buffer.  So instead don't delete entries we find in our
del_list so we can make sure we always find our delayed deletions.  This
is a slight perf hit for readdir with lots of pending deletions, but
hopefully this isn't a common occurrence.  If it is we can revist this
and optimize it.

cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: 23b5ec74 ("btrfs: fix readdir deadlock with pagefault")
Signed-off-by: default avatarJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
parent ec35e48b
...@@ -1633,28 +1633,18 @@ void btrfs_readdir_put_delayed_items(struct inode *inode, ...@@ -1633,28 +1633,18 @@ void btrfs_readdir_put_delayed_items(struct inode *inode,
int btrfs_should_delete_dir_index(struct list_head *del_list, int btrfs_should_delete_dir_index(struct list_head *del_list,
u64 index) u64 index)
{ {
struct btrfs_delayed_item *curr, *next; struct btrfs_delayed_item *curr;
int ret; int ret = 0;
if (list_empty(del_list))
return 0;
list_for_each_entry_safe(curr, next, del_list, readdir_list) { list_for_each_entry(curr, del_list, readdir_list) {
if (curr->key.offset > index) if (curr->key.offset > index)
break; break;
if (curr->key.offset == index) {
list_del(&curr->readdir_list); ret = 1;
ret = (curr->key.offset == index); break;
if (refcount_dec_and_test(&curr->refs))
kfree(curr);
if (ret)
return 1;
else
continue;
} }
return 0; }
return ret;
} }
/* /*
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment