Skip to content

L
linux
Commit f40b814a authored by Mauro Carvalho Chehab's avatar Mauro Carvalho Chehab
Browse files
Options

media: docs: split ci.rst into uAPI and user guide docs 

The ci.rst file contains two parts: the first one describing
how to use the CA high level interface; the second one with
uAPI internals.

Split this on two separate files, adding the uAPI bits
to the DVB ca.rst configuration.
Signed-off-by: default avatarMauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>
parent 64a88183
Show whitespace changes
Inline Side-by-side
Showing with 161 additions and 157 deletions
Documentation/media/dvb-drivers/ci.rst
View file @ f40b814a
.. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
Digital TV Conditional Access Interface (CI API)
================================================
Digital TV Conditional Access Interface
=======================================
.. note::
......@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ existing low level CI API.
.. note::
For the Twinhan/Twinhan clones, the dst_ca module handles the CI
hardware handling.This module is loaded automatically if a CI
hardware handling. This module is loaded automatically if a CI
(Common Interface, that holds the CAM (Conditional Access Module)
is detected.
......@@ -75,157 +75,3 @@ Modules that have been tested by this driver at present are
(1) Irdeto 1 and 2 from SCM
(2) Viaccess from SCM
(3) Dragoncam
The High level CI API
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
For the programmer
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
With the High Level CI approach any new card with almost any random
architecture can be implemented with this style, the definitions
inside the switch statement can be easily adapted for any card, thereby
eliminating the need for any additional ioctls.
The disadvantage is that the driver/hardware has to manage the rest. For
the application programmer it would be as simple as sending/receiving an
array to/from the CI ioctls as defined in the Linux DVB API. No changes
have been made in the API to accommodate this feature.
Why the need for another CI interface?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
This is one of the most commonly asked question. Well a nice question.
Strictly speaking this is not a new interface.
The CI interface is defined in the DVB API in ca.h as:
.. code-block:: c
typedef struct ca_slot_info {
int num; /* slot number */
int type; /* CA interface this slot supports */
#define CA_CI 1 /* CI high level interface */
#define CA_CI_LINK 2 /* CI link layer level interface */
#define CA_CI_PHYS 4 /* CI physical layer level interface */
#define CA_DESCR 8 /* built-in descrambler */
#define CA_SC 128 /* simple smart card interface */
unsigned int flags;
#define CA_CI_MODULE_PRESENT 1 /* module (or card) inserted */
#define CA_CI_MODULE_READY 2
} ca_slot_info_t;
This CI interface follows the CI high level interface, which is not
implemented by most applications. Hence this area is revisited.
This CI interface is quite different in the case that it tries to
accommodate all other CI based devices, that fall into the other categories.
This means that this CI interface handles the EN50221 style tags in the
Application layer only and no session management is taken care of by the
application. The driver/hardware will take care of all that.
This interface is purely an EN50221 interface exchanging APDU's. This
means that no session management, link layer or a transport layer do
exist in this case in the application to driver communication. It is
as simple as that. The driver/hardware has to take care of that.
With this High Level CI interface, the interface can be defined with the
regular ioctls.
All these ioctls are also valid for the High level CI interface
#define CA_RESET _IO('o', 128)
#define CA_GET_CAP _IOR('o', 129, ca_caps_t)
#define CA_GET_SLOT_INFO _IOR('o', 130, ca_slot_info_t)
#define CA_GET_DESCR_INFO _IOR('o', 131, ca_descr_info_t)
#define CA_GET_MSG _IOR('o', 132, ca_msg_t)
#define CA_SEND_MSG _IOW('o', 133, ca_msg_t)
#define CA_SET_DESCR _IOW('o', 134, ca_descr_t)
On querying the device, the device yields information thus:
.. code-block:: none
CA_GET_SLOT_INFO
----------------------------
Command = [info]
APP: Number=[1]
APP: Type=[1]
APP: flags=[1]
APP: CI High level interface
APP: CA/CI Module Present
CA_GET_CAP
----------------------------
Command = [caps]
APP: Slots=[1]
APP: Type=[1]
APP: Descrambler keys=[16]
APP: Type=[1]
CA_SEND_MSG
----------------------------
Descriptors(Program Level)=[ 09 06 06 04 05 50 ff f1]
Found CA descriptor @ program level
(20) ES type=[2] ES pid=[201] ES length =[0 (0x0)]
(25) ES type=[4] ES pid=[301] ES length =[0 (0x0)]
ca_message length is 25 (0x19) bytes
EN50221 CA MSG=[ 9f 80 32 19 03 01 2d d1 f0 08 01 09 06 06 04 05 50 ff f1 02 e0 c9 00 00 04 e1 2d 00 00]
Not all ioctl's are implemented in the driver from the API, the other
features of the hardware that cannot be implemented by the API are achieved
using the CA_GET_MSG and CA_SEND_MSG ioctls. An EN50221 style wrapper is
used to exchange the data to maintain compatibility with other hardware.
.. code-block:: c
/* a message to/from a CI-CAM */
typedef struct ca_msg {
unsigned int index;
unsigned int type;
unsigned int length;
unsigned char msg[256];
} ca_msg_t;
The flow of data can be described thus,
.. code-block:: none
App (User)
-----
parse
|
|
v
en50221 APDU (package)
--------------------------------------
| | | High Level CI driver
| | |
| v |
| en50221 APDU (unpackage) |
| | |
| | |
| v |
| sanity checks |
| | |
| | |
| v |
| do (H/W dep) |
--------------------------------------
| Hardware
|
v
The High Level CI interface uses the EN50221 DVB standard, following a
standard ensures futureproofness.
Documentation/media/uapi/dvb/ca.rst
View file @ f40b814a
......@@ -29,3 +29,4 @@ application.
ca_data_types
ca_function_calls
ca_high_level
Documentation/media/uapi/dvb/ca_high_level.rst 0 → 100644
View file @ f40b814a
.. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
The High level CI API
=====================
.. note::
This documentation is outdated.
This document describes the high level CI API as in accordance to the
Linux DVB API.
With the High Level CI approach any new card with almost any random
architecture can be implemented with this style, the definitions
inside the switch statement can be easily adapted for any card, thereby
eliminating the need for any additional ioctls.
The disadvantage is that the driver/hardware has to manage the rest. For
the application programmer it would be as simple as sending/receiving an
array to/from the CI ioctls as defined in the Linux DVB API. No changes
have been made in the API to accommodate this feature.
Why the need for another CI interface?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
This is one of the most commonly asked question. Well a nice question.
Strictly speaking this is not a new interface.
The CI interface is defined in the DVB API in ca.h as:
.. code-block:: c
typedef struct ca_slot_info {
int num; /* slot number */
int type; /* CA interface this slot supports */
#define CA_CI 1 /* CI high level interface */
#define CA_CI_LINK 2 /* CI link layer level interface */
#define CA_CI_PHYS 4 /* CI physical layer level interface */
#define CA_DESCR 8 /* built-in descrambler */
#define CA_SC 128 /* simple smart card interface */
unsigned int flags;
#define CA_CI_MODULE_PRESENT 1 /* module (or card) inserted */
#define CA_CI_MODULE_READY 2
} ca_slot_info_t;
This CI interface follows the CI high level interface, which is not
implemented by most applications. Hence this area is revisited.
This CI interface is quite different in the case that it tries to
accommodate all other CI based devices, that fall into the other categories.
This means that this CI interface handles the EN50221 style tags in the
Application layer only and no session management is taken care of by the
application. The driver/hardware will take care of all that.
This interface is purely an EN50221 interface exchanging APDU's. This
means that no session management, link layer or a transport layer do
exist in this case in the application to driver communication. It is
as simple as that. The driver/hardware has to take care of that.
With this High Level CI interface, the interface can be defined with the
regular ioctls.
All these ioctls are also valid for the High level CI interface
#define CA_RESET _IO('o', 128)
#define CA_GET_CAP _IOR('o', 129, ca_caps_t)
#define CA_GET_SLOT_INFO _IOR('o', 130, ca_slot_info_t)
#define CA_GET_DESCR_INFO _IOR('o', 131, ca_descr_info_t)
#define CA_GET_MSG _IOR('o', 132, ca_msg_t)
#define CA_SEND_MSG _IOW('o', 133, ca_msg_t)
#define CA_SET_DESCR _IOW('o', 134, ca_descr_t)
On querying the device, the device yields information thus:
.. code-block:: none
CA_GET_SLOT_INFO
----------------------------
Command = [info]
APP: Number=[1]
APP: Type=[1]
APP: flags=[1]
APP: CI High level interface
APP: CA/CI Module Present
CA_GET_CAP
----------------------------
Command = [caps]
APP: Slots=[1]
APP: Type=[1]
APP: Descrambler keys=[16]
APP: Type=[1]
CA_SEND_MSG
----------------------------
Descriptors(Program Level)=[ 09 06 06 04 05 50 ff f1]
Found CA descriptor @ program level
(20) ES type=[2] ES pid=[201] ES length =[0 (0x0)]
(25) ES type=[4] ES pid=[301] ES length =[0 (0x0)]
ca_message length is 25 (0x19) bytes
EN50221 CA MSG=[ 9f 80 32 19 03 01 2d d1 f0 08 01 09 06 06 04 05 50 ff f1 02 e0 c9 00 00 04 e1 2d 00 00]
Not all ioctl's are implemented in the driver from the API, the other
features of the hardware that cannot be implemented by the API are achieved
using the CA_GET_MSG and CA_SEND_MSG ioctls. An EN50221 style wrapper is
used to exchange the data to maintain compatibility with other hardware.
.. code-block:: c
/* a message to/from a CI-CAM */
typedef struct ca_msg {
unsigned int index;
unsigned int type;
unsigned int length;
unsigned char msg[256];
} ca_msg_t;
The flow of data can be described thus,
.. code-block:: none
App (User)
-----
parse
|
|
v
en50221 APDU (package)
--------------------------------------
| | | High Level CI driver
| | |
| v |
| en50221 APDU (unpackage) |
| | |
| | |
| v |
| sanity checks |
| | |
| | |
| v |
| do (H/W dep) |
--------------------------------------
| Hardware
|
v
The High Level CI interface uses the EN50221 DVB standard, following a
standard ensures futureproofness.
Markdown is supported
0% or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment
GitLab Nexedi Edition | About GitLab | About Nexedi | 沪ICP备2021021310号-2 | 沪ICP备2021021310号-7