Commit 18a34850 authored by Sergey Petrunya's avatar Sergey Petrunya

DS-MRR improvements: better comments, use symbolic name instead of +1/-1 constants.

parent 7b9df6aa
......@@ -338,6 +338,7 @@ bool SimpleBuffer::have_space_for(size_t bytes)
return (write_pos - bytes >= start);
}
size_t SimpleBuffer::used_size()
{
return (direction == 1)? write_pos - read_pos : read_pos - write_pos;
......@@ -354,16 +355,18 @@ void SimpleBuffer::setup_reading(uchar **data1, size_t len1,
read_size2= len2;
}
bool SimpleBuffer::read()
{
if (!have_data(read_size1 + (read_ptr2? read_size2 : 0)))
return TRUE;
*read_ptr1 =read(read_size1);
*read_ptr1= read(read_size1);
if (read_ptr2)
*read_ptr2= read(read_size2);
return FALSE;
}
uchar *SimpleBuffer::read(size_t bytes)
{
DBUG_ASSERT(have_data(bytes));
......@@ -381,12 +384,14 @@ uchar *SimpleBuffer::read(size_t bytes)
}
}
bool SimpleBuffer::have_data(size_t bytes)
{
return (direction == 1)? (write_pos - read_pos >= (ptrdiff_t)bytes) :
(read_pos - write_pos >= (ptrdiff_t)bytes);
}
void SimpleBuffer::reset_for_writing()
{
if (direction == 1)
......@@ -493,7 +498,7 @@ int DsMrr_impl::dsmrr_init(handler *h_arg, RANGE_SEQ_IF *seq_funcs,
*/
full_buf= buf->buffer;
full_buf_end= buf->buffer_end;
rowid_buffer.set_buffer_space(full_buf, full_buf_end, 1);
rowid_buffer.set_buffer_space(full_buf, full_buf_end, SimpleBuffer::FORWARD);
if (do_sort_keys)
{
......@@ -819,10 +824,11 @@ void DsMrr_impl::setup_buffer_sizes(key_range *sample_key)
if (!do_rowid_fetch)
{
/* Give all space to key buffer. */
key_buffer.set_buffer_space(full_buf, full_buf_end, 1);
key_buffer.set_buffer_space(full_buf, full_buf_end, SimpleBuffer::FORWARD);
/* Just in case, tell rowid buffer that it has zero size: */
rowid_buffer.set_buffer_space(full_buf_end, full_buf_end, 1);
rowid_buffer.set_buffer_space(full_buf_end, full_buf_end,
SimpleBuffer::FORWARD);
return;
}
......@@ -865,8 +871,10 @@ void DsMrr_impl::setup_buffer_sizes(key_range *sample_key)
}
rowid_buffer_end= full_buf + bytes_for_rowids;
rowid_buffer.set_buffer_space(full_buf, rowid_buffer_end, 1);
key_buffer.set_buffer_space(rowid_buffer_end, full_buf_end, -1);
rowid_buffer.set_buffer_space(full_buf, rowid_buffer_end,
SimpleBuffer::FORWARD);
key_buffer.set_buffer_space(rowid_buffer_end, full_buf_end,
SimpleBuffer::BACKWARD);
}
......@@ -906,8 +914,10 @@ void DsMrr_impl::dsmrr_fill_key_buffer()
We're using two buffers and both of them are empty now. Restore the
original sizes
*/
rowid_buffer.set_buffer_space(full_buf, rowid_buffer_end, 1);
key_buffer.set_buffer_space(rowid_buffer_end, full_buf_end, -1);
rowid_buffer.set_buffer_space(full_buf, rowid_buffer_end,
SimpleBuffer::FORWARD);
key_buffer.set_buffer_space(rowid_buffer_end, full_buf_end,
SimpleBuffer::BACKWARD);
}
key_buffer.reset_for_writing();
key_buffer.setup_writing(&key_ptr, key_size_in_keybuf,
......
......@@ -6,9 +6,14 @@
/**
A Disk-Sweep implementation of MRR Interface (DS-MRR for short)
This is a "plugin"(*) for storage engines that allows make index scans
read table rows in rowid order. For disk-based storage engines, this is
faster than reading table rows in whatever-SQL-layer-makes-calls-in order.
This is a "plugin"(*) for storage engines that allows to
1. When doing index scans, read table rows in rowid order;
2. when making many index lookups, do them in key order and don't
lookup the same key value multiple times;
3. Do both #1 and #2, when applicable.
These changes are expected to speed up query execution for disk-based
storage engines running io-bound loads and "big" queries (ie. queries that
do joins and enumerate lots of records).
(*) - only conceptually. No dynamic loading or binary compatibility of any
kind.
......@@ -17,13 +22,17 @@
SQL Layer code
| | |
-v---v---v---- handler->multi_range_read_XXX() function calls
v v v
-|---|---|---- handler->multi_range_read_XXX() function calls
| | |
____________________________________
_____________________________________
/ DS-MRR module \
| (scan indexes, order rowids, do |
| full record reads in rowid order) |
\____________________________________/
| (order/de-duplicate lookup keys, |
| scan indexes in key order, |
| order/de-duplicate rowids, |
| retrieve full record reads in rowid |
| order) |
\_____________________________________/
| | |
-|---|---|----- handler->read_range_first()/read_range_next(),
| | | handler->index_read(), handler->rnd_pos() calls.
......@@ -31,6 +40,7 @@
v v v
Storage engine internals
Currently DS-MRR is used by MyISAM, InnoDB/XtraDB and Maria storage engines.
Potentially it can be used with any table handler that has disk-based data
storage and has better performance when reading data in rowid order.
......@@ -38,77 +48,104 @@
/*
A simple memory buffer for reading and writing.
An in-memory buffer used by DS-MRR implementation.
- The buffer contains fixed-size elements. The elements are either atomic
byte sequences or pairs.
- The buffer resides in memory provided by the user. It is possible to
= dynamically (ie. between write operations) add ajacent memory space to
the buffer
= dynamically remove unused space from the buffer.
- Buffer can be set to be either "forward" or "backward".
The intent of the last two properties is to allow to have two buffers on
adjacent memory space, one is being read from (and so its space shrinks)
while the other is being written to (and so it needs more and more space).
Illustration of forward buffer operation:
+-- next read will read from here
|
| +-- next write will write to here
v v
*--------------*===============*----------------*
| ^ | ^ | |
| | read_pos | write_pos |
start | | end
| |
usused space user data
when writing, there is no user-visible "current" position, although
internally 'pos' points to just after the end of used area (or at the
start of it for reverse buffer).
When reading, there is current position pointing at start (for reverse
buffer, end) of the element that will be read next.
^^ why end for reverse? it's more logical to point at start
*/
class SimpleBuffer
{
uchar *start;
uchar *end;
public:
enum enum_direction {
BACKWARD=-1, /* buffer is filled/read from bigger to smaller memory addresses */
FORWARD=1 /* buffer is filled/read from smaller to bigger memory addresses */
};
private:
enum_direction direction;
uchar *start; /* points to start of buffer space */
uchar *end; /* points to just beyond the end of buffer space */
/*
Forward buffer: points to the start of the data that will be read next
Backward buffer: points to just beyond the end of the data that will be
read next.
*/
uchar *read_pos;
/*
Forward buffer: points to just after the end of the used area.
Backward buffer: points to the start of used area.
*/
uchar *write_pos;
/*
1 <=> buffer grows/is filled/is read from start to end
-1 <=> everthing is done from end to start instead.
Data to be written. write() call will assume that (*write_ptr1) points to
write_size1 bytes of data to be written.
If write_ptr2!=NULL then the buffer stores pairs, and (*write_ptr2) points
to write_size2 bytes of data that form the second component.
*/
int direction;
/* Pointers to read data from */
uchar **write_ptr1;
size_t write_size1;
/* Same as above, but may be NULL */
uchar **write_ptr2;
size_t write_size2;
/* Pointers to write data to */
/*
read() will do reading by storing pointer to read data into *read_ptr1 (if
the buffer stores atomic elements), or into {*read_ptr1, *read_ptr2} (if
the buffer stores pairs).
*/
//TODO if write_size1 == read_size1 why have two variables??
uchar **read_ptr1;
size_t read_size1;
/* Same as above, but may be NULL */
uchar **read_ptr2;
size_t read_size2;
bool have_space_for(size_t bytes);
uchar *used_area() { return (direction == 1)? read_pos : write_pos; }
size_t used_size();
void write(const uchar *data, size_t bytes);
uchar *read(size_t bytes);
public:
/* Set up writing*/
/* Write-mode functions */
void setup_writing(uchar **data1, size_t len1,
uchar **data2, size_t len2);
void sort(qsort2_cmp cmp_func, void *cmp_func_arg);
/* Write-mode functions */
void reset_for_writing();
void write();
bool can_write();
bool is_empty() { return used_size() == 0; }
void write();
/* Read-mode functions */
bool is_empty() { return used_size() == 0; }
void reset_for_reading();
// todo: join with setup-writing? (but what for?)
void setup_reading(uchar **data1, size_t len1,
uchar **data2, size_t len2);
bool read();
bool have_data(size_t bytes);
/* Misc functions */
void sort(qsort2_cmp cmp_func, void *cmp_func_arg);
bool is_reverse() { return direction == BACKWARD; }
uchar *end_of_space();
/* Control functions */
void set_buffer_space(uchar *start_arg, uchar *end_arg, int direction_arg)
/* Buffer space control functions */
void set_buffer_space(uchar *start_arg, uchar *end_arg, enum_direction direction_arg)
{
start= start_arg;
end= end_arg;
......@@ -118,8 +155,8 @@ class SimpleBuffer
}
/*
Stop/return the unneded space (the one that we have wrote to and have read
from.
Stop using/return the unneded space (the one that we have already wrote
to read from).
*/
void remove_unused_space(uchar **unused_start, uchar **unused_end)
{
......@@ -142,9 +179,8 @@ class SimpleBuffer
uchar *tmp= read_pos;
read_pos= write_pos;
write_pos= tmp;
direction= -direction;
direction= (direction == FORWARD)? BACKWARD: FORWARD;
}
bool is_reverse() { return direction == -1; }
void grow(uchar *unused_start, uchar *unused_end)
{
......@@ -173,10 +209,13 @@ class SimpleBuffer
*/
class PeekIterator
{
// if direction==1 : pointer to what to return next
// if direction==-1: pointer to the end of what is to be returned next
/*
if sb->direction==1 : pointer to what to return next
if sb->direction==-1: pointer to the end of what is to be returned next
*/
uchar *pos;
SimpleBuffer *sb;
public:
void init(SimpleBuffer *sb_arg)
{
......@@ -190,8 +229,10 @@ class SimpleBuffer
*/
bool read_next()
{
// Always read the first component first? (because we do inverted-writes
// if needed, so no measures need to be taken here).
/*
Always read the first component first (if the buffer is backwards, we
have written the second component first).
*/
uchar *res;
if ((res= get_next(sb->read_size1)))
{
......@@ -223,6 +264,16 @@ class SimpleBuffer
}
}
};
private:
bool have_space_for(size_t bytes);
/* Return pointer to start of the memory area that is occupied by the data */
uchar *used_area() { return (direction == FORWARD)? read_pos : write_pos; }
size_t used_size();
void write(const uchar *data, size_t bytes);
uchar *read(size_t bytes);
bool have_data(size_t bytes);
};
......@@ -231,11 +282,11 @@ class SimpleBuffer
each ha_{myisam/innobase/etc} object. That object will be further referred to
as "the handler"
There are actually three strategies
S1. Bypass DS-MRR, pass all calls to default implementation (i.e. to
DsMrr_impl has the following execution strategies:
S1. Bypass DS-MRR, pass all calls to default MRR implementation (i.e. to
MRR-to-non-MRR calls converter)
S2. Regular DS-MRR
S3. DS-MRR/CPK for doing scans on clustered primary keys.
S2. Sort Keys
S3. Sort Rowids
S1 is used for cases which DS-MRR is unable to handle for some reason.
......@@ -294,9 +345,13 @@ class DsMrr_impl
handler *h;
TABLE *table; /* Always equal to h->table */
/* Secondary handler object. It is used for scanning the index */
/*
Secondary handler object, if needed (we need it when we need to both scan
the index and return rows).
*/
handler *h2;
/* Full buffer that we're using (the buffer is obtained from SQL layer) */
uchar *full_buf;
uchar *full_buf_end;
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment