Commit 7976735a authored by Sergey Petrunia's avatar Sergey Petrunia

BUG#40974: Incorrect query results when using clause evaluated using range check

- QUICK_INDEX_MERGE_SELECT deinitializes its rnd_pos() scan when it reaches EOF, but we 
  need to make the deinitialization in QUICK_INDEX_MERGE_SELECT destructor also. This is because
  certain execution strategies can stop scanning without reaching EOF, then then try to do a full
  table scan on this table. Failure to deinitialize caused the full scan to use (already empty) 
  table->sort and produce zero records.

mysql-test/r/index_merge.result:
  BUG#40974: Incorrect query results when using clause evaluated using range check
  - Testcase
mysql-test/t/index_merge.test:
  BUG#40974: Incorrect query results when using clause evaluated using range check
  - Testcase
parent 56b9586f
...@@ -527,4 +527,32 @@ b a ...@@ -527,4 +527,32 @@ b a
y y
z z
DROP TABLE t1; DROP TABLE t1;
#
# BUG#40974: Incorrect query results when using clause evaluated using range check
#
create table t0 (a int);
insert into t0 values (0),(1),(2),(3),(4),(5),(6),(7),(8),(9);
create table t1 (a int);
insert into t1 values (1),(2);
create table t2(a int, b int);
insert into t2 values (1,1), (2, 1000);
create table t3 (a int, b int, filler char(100), key(a), key(b));
insert into t3 select 1000, 1000,'filler' from t0 A, t0 B, t0 C;
insert into t3 values (1,1,'data');
insert into t3 values (1,1,'data');
The plan should be ALL/ALL/ALL(Range checked for each record (index map: 0x3)
explain select * from t1
where exists (select 1 from t2, t3
where t2.a=t1.a and (t3.a=t2.b or t3.b=t2.b or t3.b=t2.b+1));
id select_type table type possible_keys key key_len ref rows Extra
1 PRIMARY t1 ALL NULL NULL NULL NULL 2 Using where
2 DEPENDENT SUBQUERY t2 ALL NULL NULL NULL NULL 2 Using where
2 DEPENDENT SUBQUERY t3 ALL a,b NULL NULL NULL 1002 Range checked for each record (index map: 0x3)
select * from t1
where exists (select 1 from t2, t3
where t2.a=t1.a and (t3.a=t2.b or t3.b=t2.b or t3.b=t2.b+1));
a
1
2
drop table t0, t1, t2, t3;
End of 5.0 tests End of 5.0 tests
...@@ -477,4 +477,30 @@ SELECT b,a from t1 WHERE (b!='c' AND b!='f' && b!='h') OR ...@@ -477,4 +477,30 @@ SELECT b,a from t1 WHERE (b!='c' AND b!='f' && b!='h') OR
DROP TABLE t1; DROP TABLE t1;
--echo #
--echo # BUG#40974: Incorrect query results when using clause evaluated using range check
--echo #
create table t0 (a int);
insert into t0 values (0),(1),(2),(3),(4),(5),(6),(7),(8),(9);
create table t1 (a int);
insert into t1 values (1),(2);
create table t2(a int, b int);
insert into t2 values (1,1), (2, 1000);
create table t3 (a int, b int, filler char(100), key(a), key(b));
insert into t3 select 1000, 1000,'filler' from t0 A, t0 B, t0 C;
insert into t3 values (1,1,'data');
insert into t3 values (1,1,'data');
-- echo The plan should be ALL/ALL/ALL(Range checked for each record (index map: 0x3)
explain select * from t1
where exists (select 1 from t2, t3
where t2.a=t1.a and (t3.a=t2.b or t3.b=t2.b or t3.b=t2.b+1));
select * from t1
where exists (select 1 from t2, t3
where t2.a=t1.a and (t3.a=t2.b or t3.b=t2.b or t3.b=t2.b+1));
drop table t0, t1, t2, t3;
--echo End of 5.0 tests --echo End of 5.0 tests
...@@ -1109,6 +1109,9 @@ QUICK_INDEX_MERGE_SELECT::~QUICK_INDEX_MERGE_SELECT() ...@@ -1109,6 +1109,9 @@ QUICK_INDEX_MERGE_SELECT::~QUICK_INDEX_MERGE_SELECT()
quick->file= NULL; quick->file= NULL;
quick_selects.delete_elements(); quick_selects.delete_elements();
delete pk_quick_select; delete pk_quick_select;
/* It's ok to call the next two even if they are already deinitialized */
end_read_record(&read_record);
free_io_cache(head);
free_root(&alloc,MYF(0)); free_root(&alloc,MYF(0));
DBUG_VOID_RETURN; DBUG_VOID_RETURN;
} }
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment