Commit c8fad67d authored by Timothy Smith's avatar Timothy Smith

Cherry-pick one change from innodb-5.1-ss2485 snapshot. Fixes Bug#35602.

Bug #35602 "Failed to read auto-increment value from storage engine" with
Innodb

The test for REPLACE was an error of ommission since it's classified as
a simple INSERT. For REPLACE statements we don't acquire the special
AUTOINC lock for AUTOINC_NEW_STYLE_LOCKING with this fix.
parent 239ab2c4
...@@ -3277,7 +3277,8 @@ ha_innobase::innobase_autoinc_lock(void) ...@@ -3277,7 +3277,8 @@ ha_innobase::innobase_autoinc_lock(void)
old style only if another transaction has already acquired old style only if another transaction has already acquired
the AUTOINC lock on behalf of a LOAD FILE or INSERT ... SELECT the AUTOINC lock on behalf of a LOAD FILE or INSERT ... SELECT
etc. type of statement. */ etc. type of statement. */
if (thd_sql_command(user_thd) == SQLCOM_INSERT) { if (thd_sql_command(user_thd) == SQLCOM_INSERT
|| thd_sql_command(user_thd) == SQLCOM_REPLACE) {
dict_table_t* table = prebuilt->table; dict_table_t* table = prebuilt->table;
/* Acquire the AUTOINC mutex. */ /* Acquire the AUTOINC mutex. */
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment