1. 31 Jul, 2018 2 commits
  2. 30 Jul, 2018 10 commits
    • Marko Mäkelä's avatar
      MDEV-16855 Fix fts_sync_synchronization in InnoDB · e52315a4
      Marko Mäkelä authored
      This is a backport of the following fix from MySQL 5.7.23.
      Some code refactoring has been omitted, and the test case has
      been adapted to MariaDB.
      
      commit 7a689acaa65e9d602575f7aa53fe36a64a07460f
      Author: Krzysztof Kapuścik <krzysztof.kapuscik@oracle.com>
      Date:   Tue Mar 13 12:34:03 2018 +0100
      
      Bug#27082268 Invalid FTS sync synchronization
      
      The fix closes two issues:
      Bug #27082268 - INNODB: FAILING ASSERTION: SYM_NODE->TABLE != NULL DURING FTS SYNC
      Bug #27095935 - DEADLOCK BETWEEN FTS_DROP_INDEX AND FTS_OPTIMIZE_SYNC_TABLE
      
      Both issues were related to a FTS cache sync being done during
      operations that perfomed DDL actions on internal FTS tables
      (ALTER TABLE, TRUNCATE). In some cases the FTS tables and/or
      internal cache structures could get removed while still being
      used to perform FTS synchronization leading to crashes. In other
      the sync operations could not get finishes as it was waiting for
      dict lock which was taken by thread waiting for the background
      sync to be finished.
      
      The changes done includes:
      - Stopping background operations during ALTER TABLE and TRUNCATE.
      - Removal of unused code in FTS.
      - Cleanup of FTS sync related code to make it more readable and
      easier to maintain.
      
      RB#18262
      e52315a4
    • Marko Mäkelä's avatar
      Apply the 5.6.40 security fixes to XtraDB · 5ed2da95
      Marko Mäkelä authored
      We did not merge Percona XtraDB 5.6.40-84.0 yet.
      The changes in it are mostly cosmetic, except for
      2 bug fixes from Oracle MySQL 5.6.40, which could
      be security bugs.
      
      This was achieved by taking the applicable parts
      of an earlier InnoDB commit to XtraDB:
      
      git diff 15ec8c2f{~,} storage/innobase|
      sed -e s+/innobase/+/xtradb/+|patch -p1
      5ed2da95
    • Marko Mäkelä's avatar
      Merge 5.5 into 10.0 · 7c773abd
      Marko Mäkelä authored
      7c773abd
    • Karthik Kamath's avatar
      No commit message · a49ec980
      Karthik Kamath authored
      No commit message
      a49ec980
    • Marko Mäkelä's avatar
      Merge InnoDB MySQL 5.6.41 to 10.0 · 4c21c367
      Marko Mäkelä authored
      4c21c367
    • Sachin Agarwal's avatar
      Bug #27326796 - MYSQL CRASH WITH INNODB ASSERTION FAILURE IN FILE PARS0PARS.CC · 29ddc6e9
      Sachin Agarwal authored
      Problem:
      As part of bug #24938374 fix, dict_operation_lock was not taken by
      fts_optimize_thread while syncing fts cache.
      Due to this change, alter query is able to update SYS_TABLE rows
      simultaneously. Now when fts_optimizer_thread goes open index table,
      It doesn't open index table if the record corresponding to that table is
      set to REC_INFO_DELETED_FLAG in SYS_TABLES and hits an assert.
      
      Fix:
      If fts sync is already in progress, Alter query would wait for sync to
      complete before renaming table.
      
      RB: #19604
      Reviewed by : Jimmy.Yang@oracle.com
      29ddc6e9
    • Marko Mäkelä's avatar
      Merge 5.5 into 10.0 · 91181b22
      Marko Mäkelä authored
      91181b22
    • Marko Mäkelä's avatar
      Fix InnoDB/XtraDB warnings by GCC 8.2.0 · d17e9a02
      Marko Mäkelä authored
      d17e9a02
    • Marko Mäkelä's avatar
      MDEV-16851 On schema mismatch in IMPORT TABLESPACE, display ROW_FORMAT in clear text · 8bdd1250
      Marko Mäkelä authored
      This is motivated by Oracle MySQL Bug #27542720 SCHEMA MISMATCH
      - TABLE FLAGS DON'T MATCH, BUT FLAGS ARE NUMBERS
      but using a different approach.
      
      row_import::match_schema(): In case of a mismatch, display the
      ROW_FORMAT and optionally KEY_BLOCK_SIZE of the .cfg file.
      8bdd1250
    • Marko Mäkelä's avatar
      Use a more precise argument for memset() · 34096335
      Marko Mäkelä authored
      34096335
  3. 29 Jul, 2018 1 commit
    • Oleksandr Byelkin's avatar
      Merge remote-tracking branch 'mysql/5.5' into 5.5 · fceda2da
      Oleksandr Byelkin authored
      We do not accept:
      1. We did not have this problem (fixed earlier and better)
       d982e717 Bug#27510150: MYSQLDUMP FAILS FOR SPECIFIC --WHERE CLAUSES
      2. We do not have such options (an DBUG_ASSERT put just in case)
       bbc2e37f Bug#27759871: BACKRONYM ISSUE IS STILL IN MYSQL 5.7
      3. Serg fixed it in other way in this release:
       e48d775c Bug#27980823: HEAP OVERFLOW VULNERABILITIES IN MYSQL CLIENT LIBRARY
      fceda2da
  4. 27 Jul, 2018 2 commits
  5. 26 Jul, 2018 1 commit
  6. 25 Jul, 2018 7 commits
    • Oleksandr Byelkin's avatar
      cb5952b5
    • Varun Gupta's avatar
      MDEV-15454: Nested SELECT IN returns wrong results · 37dee22d
      Varun Gupta authored
      In this case we are setting the field Item_func_eq::in_eqaulity_no for the semi-join equalities.
      This helps us to remove these equalites as the inner tables are not available during parent select execution
      while the outer tables are not available during materialization phase.
      We only have it set for the equalites for the fields involved with the IN subquery
      and reset it for the equalities which do not belong to the IN subquery.
      
      For example in case of nested IN subqueries:
      
          SELECT t1.a FROM t1 WHERE t1.a IN
            (SELECT t2.a FROM t2 where t2.b IN
                (select t3.b from t3 where t3.c=27 ))
      
      there are two equalites involving the fields of the IN subquery
      
      1) t2.b = t3.b :  the field Item_func_eq::in_eqaulity_no is set when we merge the grandchild select into the child select
      2) t1.a = t2.a :  the field Item_func_eq::in_eqaulity_no is set when we merge the child select into the parent select
      
      But when we perform case 2) we should ensure that we reset the equalities in the child's WHERE clause.
      37dee22d
    • Varun Gupta's avatar
      MDEV-16751: Server crashes in st_join_table::cleanup or... · f9b43c25
      Varun Gupta authored
      MDEV-16751: Server crashes in st_join_table::cleanup or TABLE_LIST::is_with_table_recursive_reference
                  with join_cache_level>2
      
      During muliple equality propagation for a query in which we have an IN subquery, the items in the select list of the
      subquery may not be part of the multiple equality because there might be another occurence of the same field in the
      where clause of the subquery.
      So we keyuse_is_valid_for_access_in_chosen_plan function which expects the items in the select list of the subquery to
      be same to the ones in the multiple equality (through these multiple equalities we create keyuse array).
      The solution would be that we expect the same field not the same Item because when we have SEMI JOIN MATERIALIZATION SCAN,
      we use copy back technique to copies back the materialised table fields to the original fields of the base tables.
      f9b43c25
    • Igor Babaev's avatar
      MDEV-16820 Lost 'Impossible where' from query with inexpensive subquery · 1fde449f
      Igor Babaev authored
      This patch fixes another problem introduced by the patch for mdev-4817.
      The latter changed Item_cond::fix_fields() in such a way that it could
      call the virtual method is_expensive(). With the first its call
      the method saves the result in Item::is_expensive_cache. For all next
      calls the method returns the result from this cache. So if the item
      once was determined as expensive the method always returns true.
      For subqueries it's not good, because non-optimized subqueries always
      is considered as expensive.
      It means that the cache should be invalidated after the call of
      optimize_constant_subqueries().
      1fde449f
    • Igor Babaev's avatar
      MDEV-16820 Lost 'Impossible where' from query with inexpensive subquery · c6310607
      Igor Babaev authored
      This patch fixes another problem introduced by the patch for mdev-4817.
      The latter changed Item_cond::fix_fields() in such a way that it could
      call the virtual method is_expensive(). With the first its call
      the method saves the result in Item::is_expensive_cache. For all next
      calls the method returns the result from this cache. So if the item
      once was determined as expensive the method always returns true.
      For subqueries it's not good, because non-optimized subqueries always
      is considered as expensive.
      It means that the cache should be invalidated after the call of
      optimize_constant_subqueries().
      c6310607
    • Jan Lindström's avatar
      MDEV-15822: WSREP: BF lock wait long for trx · 57cde8cc
      Jan Lindström authored
      In Galera BF (brute force) transactions may not wait for lock requests
      and normally BF-transaction would select transaction holding conflicting
      locks as a victim for rollback. However, background statistic calculation
      transaction is InnoDB internal transaction and it has no thd i.e. it can't be
      selected as a victim. If background statistics calculation transaction holds
      conflicting locks to statistics tables it will cause BF lock wait long
      error message. Correct way to handle background statistics calculation is to
      acquire thd for transaction but that change is too big for GA-releases and
      there are other reported problems on background statistics calculation.
      
      This fix avoids adding a table to background statistics calculation if
      57cde8cc
    • Igor Babaev's avatar
      MDEV-16820 Lost 'Impossible where' from query with inexpensive subquery · d567f161
      Igor Babaev authored
      This patch fixes another problem introduced by the patch for mdev-4817.
      The latter changed Item_cond::fix_fields() in such a way that it could
      call the virtual method is_expensive(). With the first its call
      the method saves the result in Item::is_expensive_cache. For all next
      calls the method returns the result from this cache. So if the item
      once was determined as expensive the method always returns true.
      For subqueries it's not good, because non-optimized subqueries always
      is considered as expensive.
      It means that the cache should be invalidated after the call of
      optimize_constant_subqueries().
      d567f161
  7. 24 Jul, 2018 4 commits
  8. 23 Jul, 2018 1 commit
  9. 20 Jul, 2018 1 commit
  10. 19 Jul, 2018 11 commits