Fix a llvm-tier getiter() bug
If we find a type that - we think we can reason about statically - does not have an __iter__ but can be iterated via __getitem__ we previously just bailed saying that we know it doesn't have an __iter__ method (instead of calling getiterHelper like we should). I think we've always had this, we've just never run into it until testing the refcounting in llvm-only mode.
Showing
Please register or sign in to comment