- 04 Apr, 2016 2 commits
-
-
Kevin Modzelewski authored
-
Kevin Modzelewski authored
I think this exists on master as well.
-
- 02 Apr, 2016 4 commits
-
-
Marius Wachtler authored
Two minor refcounting fixing in int and long functions.
-
Marius Wachtler authored
this is nice for making the generated LLVM IR and bjit code simpler when debugging code
-
Kevin Modzelewski authored
Name deleting stores a NULL into the vregs array, and then consumes a reference to it. Another solution would be to change the name deleting to not consume the reference, but this commit changes the refcounter to handle null values better.
-
Kevin Modzelewski authored
-
- 01 Apr, 2016 5 commits
-
-
Kevin Modzelewski authored
-
Boxiang Sun authored
-
Boxiang Sun authored
-
Kevin Modzelewski authored
I thought I was getting close so I spent a few days on this. But there's still a lot of work left to be done to get it to be usable.
-
Marius Wachtler authored
-
- 31 Mar, 2016 6 commits
-
-
Marius Wachtler authored
Just pass a increfed None in becasue the LLVM tier will always decref this value
-
Marius Wachtler authored
-
Marius Wachtler authored
-
Marius Wachtler authored
-
Kevin Modzelewski authored
Previously we would check signals first. Which means that we would then call into a signal handler with an active exception, which would later trigger asserts. For CXX functions, the exception automatically wins over the signal checking. CPython also checks signals first. The only tricky thing is that this was happening because the signals stuff was hooked deeper down the stack. So pass down the CAPI-exception data as well.
-
Kevin Modzelewski authored
One of them was an issue of defining a CXX-style accelerator but not a CAPI-style one, so that's now asserted against.
-
- 30 Mar, 2016 9 commits
-
-
Kevin Modzelewski authored
Copy over tp_new_wrapper, which is the main thing that should be doing the check. Our implementation was pretty much the same minus that check. There's also a separate check that isn't completely necessary but seems like a good idea, and we had it on certain codepaths, and whether you hit it depended on whether you were in CAPI mode or not.
-
Kevin Modzelewski authored
-
Kevin Modzelewski authored
-
Kevin Modzelewski authored
-
Kevin Modzelewski authored
It will end up spitting out something like: %x = callattrCapi() Py_XDECREF(x) if (!x) throwCapiException() We usually write something more like: %x = callattrCapi() if (!x) throwCapiException() Py_DECREF(x) But with optimizations turned on, llvm will turn them into the same thing.
-
Marius Wachtler authored
-
Marius Wachtler authored
-
Marius Wachtler authored
-
Kevin Modzelewski authored
-
- 29 Mar, 2016 14 commits
-
-
Kevin Modzelewski authored
-
Kevin Modzelewski authored
-
Kevin Modzelewski authored
-
Kevin Modzelewski authored
-
Kevin Modzelewski authored
-
Kevin Modzelewski authored
-
Kevin Modzelewski authored
-
Kevin Modzelewski authored
-
Kevin Modzelewski authored
-
Kevin Modzelewski authored
-
Kevin Modzelewski authored
We would incref them before putting them into the args array. Now we keep some extra information during the rewriting process, which lets rearrangeArguments say whether any of the values need to be decreffed. It's pretty rare that they need to so I think this should be some nice savings (20% on a specifically-targeted microbenchmark, no change on raytrace.py). I'm a little bit worried though that since it is so rare to need to do the decref, it would be easy to forget to check for it. Well I think we already were forgetting it in some places... but at least now it's an explicit arg you have to manage so maybe it's less likely to cause mistakes.
-
Kevin Modzelewski authored
-
Kevin Modzelewski authored
-
Kevin Modzelewski authored
-