Then the user can select the prefered language in the ERP5JS UI

erp5_osoe_web_renderjs_ui: erp5_osoe_web_renderjs_ui: Add osoe web site to use osoe_access as the frontpage

user-Howto.Create.Trade.Conditions.008.en

erp5_user_tutorial: Setup and launch configurator before run test.erp5.testFunctionalStandaloneUserTutorial.py

erp5_web_renderjs_ui_test_core
erp5_configurator_standard

The previous implementation will generate URL like:
erp5/test_page_module/core/TestRunner.html?
Which missed the test created in portal_tests, the correct one should be:
erp5/test_page_module/portal_tests/user-Howto.Create.Persons/core/TestRunner.html?
This code was inspired by https://lab.nexedi.com/nexedi/erp5/blob/master/product/ERP5Type/tests/ERP5TypeFunctionalTestCase.py#L86

This front page gadget allows user to:
* create any kind of document
* launch any kind of report
* contribute a new documents

This gadget can be used to replicate the xhtml access page.

Eventhough _getBudgetDict was cached, getAvailableBudgetDict also
calculates getCurrentBudget for each cell, which is also heavy.

Duplicate actions are actions from the same category with the same name.

See merge request nexedi/erp5!1442

With software release test suites, there are probably
files/folders with permission issues.

See commit 380037f8.

See merge request nexedi/erp5!1439

By setting XORG_LOCK_DIR, we can isolate processes when running on slapos test
nodes, so that instead of having all test runners used the shared /tmp, which
eventually fail with

    EnvironmentError: All displays locked : [':123', ':124', ':125', ...

errors when too many testnodes are currently running or too many testnodes have
left some stale lock files. Eventhough since fbdb4ec9 (test: Do not check
presence of lockfile in /tmp/ to assume Xvfb is running for this display, 2017-06-07)
things have improved, it happens that the lock files are owned by a different
unix user (because it was left by another testnode), then Xvfb is not able to
remove the stale lock file.

This is backward compatibility code for previous commit.

actions in erp5_jio_view category does not seem to be directly presented
to user, so rename them so that they don't use the same name "View" for
coding style test_DuplicateActions

Duplicate actions are actions from the same category with the same name.

`inst/test0-0`  ->  `i/0`

See merge request nexedi/erp5!1441

With bf57228a ([erp5_core] RelationField listbox must also fetch
default_params value from the relationfield, 2018-05-09), we introduced a
regression that listboxs from relation fields "proxy listbox ids" default params
where no longer used. As a result, if we have a listbox which define some
catalog search with default parameters, like for example the "Suppliers" or
"Clients" listboxs from erp5_trade are doing, these parameters were not
taken into account. In the case of trade listbox, this was showing all nodes.

This changes Base_getRelatedObjectParameter to get catalog search from the
proxy listbox if there is one.

trade_renderjs_ui_test: tests for "Suppliers", "Clients", "Organisations" and "Persons" Proxy Listbox Ids

This is mostly for editor fields, to fix the problem that components were
edited by the text editor and not the code editor.

Editor is selected by Base_getEditorFieldPreferredTextEditor, which will
use a text editor by default, unless the document has a content type, in
which case it will return the most appropriate editor, which is by default
the source code editor for documents whose text content is not text/html.

It's anyway not wrong to have a content type defined here, Components
are TextDocuments and TextDocuments usually have getContentType method.