"software/unstable/sugar-crm/instance.cfg" did not exist on "92af2456baddc90d00c435e1b968cf264e7fdc69"
Commit 689f7933 authored by Filipa Lacerda's avatar Filipa Lacerda

Merge branch 'master' into 27955-mr-notification-use-pipeline-language

* master:
  Remove a transient failure from spec/requests/api/groups_spec.rb
  Update PROCESS.md
  Update MergeRequest API state_event option documentation
parents 657c4c18 b88e82ff
......@@ -59,7 +59,7 @@ star, smile, etc.). Some good tips about code reviews can be found in our
## Feature Freeze
On the 7th of each month, RC1 of the upcoming release is created and deployed to GitLab.com and the stable branch for this release is frozen, which means master is no longer merged into it.
After the 7th (Pacific Standard Time Zone) of each month, RC1 of the upcoming release is created and deployed to GitLab.com and the stable branch for this release is frozen, which means master is no longer merged into it.
Merge requests may still be merged into master during this period,
but they will go into the _next_ release, unless they are manually cherry-picked into the stable branch.
By freezing the stable branches 2 weeks prior to a release, we reduce the risk of a last minute merge request potentially breaking things.
......
......@@ -350,16 +350,17 @@ PUT /projects/:id/merge_requests/:merge_request_id
| --------- | ---- | -------- | ----------- |
| `id` | string | yes | The ID of a project |
| `merge_request_id` | integer | yes | The ID of a merge request |
| `source_branch` | string | yes | The source branch |
| `target_branch` | string | yes | The target branch |
| `title` | string | yes | Title of MR |
| `target_branch` | string | no | The target branch |
| `title` | string | no | Title of MR |
| `assignee_id` | integer | no | Assignee user ID |
| `description` | string | no | Description of MR |
| `target_project_id` | integer | no | The target project (numeric id) |
| `state_event` | string | no | New state (close/reopen) |
| `labels` | string | no | Labels for MR as a comma-separated list |
| `milestone_id` | integer | no | The ID of a milestone |
| `remove_source_branch` | boolean | no | Flag indicating if a merge request should remove the source branch when merging |
Must include at least one non-required attribute from above.
```json
{
"id": 1,
......
......@@ -138,7 +138,7 @@ module API
params do
optional :title, type: String, allow_blank: false, desc: 'The title of the merge request'
optional :target_branch, type: String, allow_blank: false, desc: 'The target branch'
optional :state_event, type: String, values: %w[close reopen merge],
optional :state_event, type: String, values: %w[close reopen],
desc: 'Status of the merge request'
use :optional_params
at_least_one_of :title, :target_branch, :description, :assignee_id,
......
......@@ -35,7 +35,8 @@ describe API::Groups, api: true do
expect(response).to have_http_status(200)
expect(json_response).to be_an Array
expect(json_response.length).to eq(1)
expect(json_response.first['name']).to eq(group1.name)
expect(json_response)
.to satisfy_one { |group| group['name'] == group1.name }
end
it "does not include statistics" do
......@@ -70,7 +71,7 @@ describe API::Groups, api: true do
repository_size: 123,
lfs_objects_size: 234,
build_artifacts_size: 345,
}
}.stringify_keys
project1.statistics.update!(attributes)
......@@ -78,7 +79,8 @@ describe API::Groups, api: true do
expect(response).to have_http_status(200)
expect(json_response).to be_an Array
expect(json_response.first['statistics']).to eq attributes.stringify_keys
expect(json_response)
.to satisfy_one { |group| group['statistics'] == attributes }
end
end
......
# These matchers are a syntactic hack to provide more readable expectations for
# an Enumerable object.
#
# They take advantage of the `all?`, `none?`, and `one?` methods, and the fact
# that RSpec provides a `be_something` matcher for all predicates.
#
# Example:
#
# # Ensure exactly one object in an Array satisfies a condition
# expect(users.one? { |u| u.admin? }).to eq true
#
# # The same thing, but using the `be_one` matcher
# expect(users).to be_one { |u| u.admin? }
#
# # The same thing again, but using `satisfy_one` for improved readability
# expect(users).to satisfy_one { |u| u.admin? }
RSpec::Matchers.alias_matcher :satisfy_all, :be_all
RSpec::Matchers.alias_matcher :satisfy_none, :be_none
RSpec::Matchers.alias_matcher :satisfy_one, :be_one
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment