Resolve "Create a tab shortcut to jump directly to content"

## What does this MR do?
Adds accessibility shortcut to page, i.e. if user hits `tab` key right after the page is loaded and user has not interacted to any part of the page, the shortcut appears at top left corner of the page. Then, pressing `enter` (`spacebar` support is WIP) scrolls page to focus on content.

## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
See if `id` attribute added to `.content` element (present in [_page.html.haml](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/app/views/layouts/_page.html.haml)) needs to be reviewed if it is correct approach or we already have an ID that shortcut can refer to.

## Why was this MR needed?
This feature is particularly useful for screen readers where user doesn't have to go through entire nav to reach content of page.

## Screenshots (if relevant)
![Screenshot_from_2016-11-17_17-59-22](/uploads/0eb0149f46bd35e9ce629e7a6533be53/Screenshot_from_2016-11-17_17-59-22.png)

## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?

- [ ] [Changelog entry](https://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/changelog.html) added
- [ ] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md)
- [ ] API support added
- Tests
  - [ ] Added for this feature/bug
  - [ ] All builds are passing
- [ ] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html)
- [ ] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [ ] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if it does - rebase it please)
- [ ] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)

## What are the relevant issue numbers?


Closes #24057

See merge request !7533

Add placeholder in the color input inside the create new label popup

## What does this MR do?
Adds the missing placeholder  *"Assign custom color #FF0000"*  in the label creation popup ( example text for custom hex color).

## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?

## Why was this MR needed?
When creating a new label, the example text for custom hex color is missing

## Screenshots (if relevant)
Before
![before](/uploads/a3157414d59cea609118a7d711f9b9ee/before.png)

After
![Selection_051](/uploads/ca3e2089b40069e4cb6b7aa295b28cfc/Selection_051.png)

## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?

- [X] [Changelog entry](https://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/changelog.html) added
- [ ] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md)
- [ ] API support added
- Tests
  - [ ] Added for this feature/bug
  - [ ] All builds are passing
- [ ] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html)
- [ ] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [X] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if it does - rebase it please)
- [ ] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)

## What are the relevant issue numbers?
#24512 

See merge request !7492

Improve importing of github pull requests

Closes #24072

See merge request !7241

Update "Supported web browsers" text

## What does this MR do?

Updates the `Supported web browsers` text in the installation docs.

## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?

## Why was this MR needed?

Slack discussion

## Screenshots (if relevant)

## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?

- [ ] [Changelog entry](https://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/changelog.html) added
- [ ] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md)
- [ ] API support added
- Tests
  - [ ] Added for this feature/bug
  - [ ] All builds are passing
- [ ] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html)
- [ ] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [ ] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if it does - rebase it please)
- [ ] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)

## What are the relevant issue numbers?

See merge request !7341

Allow sorting groups in API

Relates to #20013.

See merge request !7529

Update copy.md with issue guideline updates and merge request guidelines

Update copy.md with issue guideline updates and merge request guidelines

See merge request !7513

Update examples and labels to use sentence case.

Update copy.md  [ci skip]

Update copy.md [ci skip]

Update copy.md

Ref #24073

Fix missing URL from environments docs

See merge request !7542

[ci skip]

Fix line numbers not matching up with code in Firefox.

Firefox has had broken line number alignment for a while now, if this is a bug with Firefox they don't seem to want to fix it since its been there from 46 through 49. This fixes it.

Before:

![Screen_Shot_2016-09-22_at_3.08.44_PM](/uploads/8bb65f40e44f738c0c375b0c8ef7dea6/Screen_Shot_2016-09-22_at_3.08.44_PM.png)

After:

![Screen_Shot_2016-09-22_at_3.09.10_PM](/uploads/9e537be56886569d8a82390f2b97c42b/Screen_Shot_2016-09-22_at_3.09.10_PM.png)

Fixes #20202.

Safari/Chrome work the same as before, Snippets seems to work fine still as well.

Page tested: http://localhost:3000/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/app/models/project.rb

cc: @annabeldunstone

See merge request !6485

Decide on and document a convention for singletons

> The singleton pattern is a design pattern that restricts the instantiation of a class to one object. This is useful when exactly one object is needed to coordinate actions across the system. 

The simplest implementation uses an object literal to contain the logic.

```javascript
gl.MyThing = {
  prop1: 'hello',
  method1: () => {}
};
```
A live example of this is [GfmAutoComplete](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/172aab108b875e8dc9a5f1d3c2d53018eff76ea1/app/assets/javascripts/gfm_auto_complete.js.es6)

Another approach makes use of ES6 `class` syntax.
```javascript
let singleton;

class MyThing {
  constructor() {
    if (!singleton) {
       singleton = this;
       singleton.init();
     }
      return singleton;
  }

  init() {
    this.prop1 = 'hello';
  }

  method1() {}
}

gl.MyThing = MyThing;
```
A live example of this is [Sidebar](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/app/assets/javascripts/sidebar.js.es6)

Another functional approach to define Singleton using `Javascript Revealing Module Pattern` is like below
```javascript
/**
  *  1. It instantiates only a single object
  *  2. It is safe – it keeps the reference to the singleton inside a variable, which lives inside a lexical closure, so it is not accessible by the outside world
  *  3. It allows privacy – you can define all private methods of your singleton inside the lexical closure of the first module pattern
  *  4. No this keyword trap (no wrong context referring)
  *  5. No use of new keyword
  *  6. Easy to write test code
  */
//
const Singleton = (function () {
  // Instance stores a reference to the Singleton
  var instance;
  function init() {
    // Singleton
    // Private methods and variables
    function privateMethod(){
        console.log( "I am private" );
    }
    var privateVariable = "Im also private";
    var privateRandomNumber = Math.random();
    return {
      // Public methods and variables
      publicMethod: function () {
        console.log( "The public can see me!" );
      },
      publicProperty: "I am also public",
      getRandomNumber: function() {
        return privateRandomNumber;
      }
    };
  };
  return {
    // Get the Singleton instance if one exists
    // or create one if it doesn't
    getInstance: function () {
      if ( !instance ) {
        instance = init();
      }
      return instance;
    }
  };
})();

const singletonObj = Singleton.getInstance()

```

## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?

## What does this MR do? 

Creates a space for discussion and contribution for interested devs.

## Why was this MR needed?

## Screenshots (if relevant)

## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?

- [x] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md)
- [x] All builds are passing
(http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html)
- [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)

## What are the relevant issue numbers?

See merge request !6620

Fixing the issue of visiting a project fork url giving 500 error when not signed…

Closes https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/24302

See merge request !7392

Support subscribing to group labels

https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/23586

See merge request !7215

Allow `order_by` and `sort` parameters to `/api/v3/groups.json`. At
present, only ordering by name and path is supported, and the default
sort is name ascending (alphabetical order).

Allows to authorize chat user against GitLab.

This is needed for: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/merge_requests/7438

See merge request !7450

Remove unused CI gems

See merge request !7522

Start to document how to code for CE with EE in mind

Closes #23740

[ci skip]

See merge request !7248

Signed-off-by: Rémy Coutable <remy@rymai.me>

[ci skip]
Signed-off-by: Rémy Coutable <remy@rymai.me>

[ci skip]
Signed-off-by: Rémy Coutable <remy@rymai.me>

Include author in assignee dropdown search

## What does this MR do?

Previously when you searched for the author in the assignee dropdown (if they aren't in the project) it did not actually include the author. This changes that so that when you search for the author it will correctly include the user.

## Screenshots (if relevant)

![Screen_Shot_2016-11-17_at_11.14.53](/uploads/5a13475d8ded459fd3b1ba6570897665/Screen_Shot_2016-11-17_at_11.14.53.png)

## What are the relevant issue numbers?

Closes #22905

See merge request !7526