Evalute time_ago method instead of printing it

![Screen_Shot_2016-11-21_at_21.00.34](/uploads/295ffa522865fe1865b0c0b552a49ebf/Screen_Shot_2016-11-21_at_21.00.34.png)

See merge request !7634

Fix 500 error when group name ends with git

Closes https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/support-forum/issues/1298
Closes https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/24742

See merge request !7630

Add deploy chat command

This adds a new ChatOps command:
```
/trigger deploy <environment> to <environment>
```

See merge request !7619

Send registry address with build payload

## What does this MR do?

Adds `registry_url` as a part of a build payload, when sending a response to a GitLab Runner which requested a new build.

## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?

Change in `lib/ci/api/entities.rb`.

## Why was this MR needed?

This is one of the steps needed to add support for private/protected registries hosted with GitLab CE/EE.

## Screenshots (if relevant)

## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?

- [x] [Changelog entry](https://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/changelog.html) added
- [ ] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md)
- [x] API support added
- Tests
  - [x] Added for this feature/bug
  - [ ] All builds are passing
- [ ] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html)
- [ ] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [ ] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if it does - rebase it please)
- [ ] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)

## What are the relevant issue numbers?

Related to gitlab-org/gitlab-ci-multi-runner#1828, gitlab-org/gitlab-ci-multi-runner!386, gitlab-org/gitlab-ci-multi-runner#1434

See merge request !7474

Fix permissions error

## What does this MR do?
Gives the permissions to the child row in order to render it properly.

## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?

- [ ] [Changelog entry](https://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/changelog.html) added
- [ ] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md)
- [ ] API support added
- Tests
  - [ ] Added for this feature/bug
  - [ ] All builds are passing
- [ ] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html)
- [ ] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [ ] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if it does - rebase it please)
- [ ] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)

## What are the relevant issue numbers?

See merge request !7627

Resolve "Activity entries are not loaded fully to cover full window's height"

## What does this MR do?

Fixes a bug in which a browser window large enough to encompass the default number of items in an auto-loading endless-scroll list could not trigger the loading of additional items.

## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?

I refactored activities.js and pager.js into es6 syntax while I was investigating the issue.  No changes were made other than some es6 flourishes and eslint conformity, so nothing should be effected, but perhaps best to double check other pages which utilize these scripts.

## Screenshots (if relevant)

![endless-scroll-fixed](/uploads/b672b606826af745528c209ab6cfe95c/endless-scroll-fixed.gif)

## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?

- [x] [Changelog entry](https://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/changelog.html) added
- Tests
  - [x] All builds are passing
- [x] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html)
- [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if it does - rebase it please)
- [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)

## What are the relevant issue numbers?


Closes #24499

See merge request !7608

Fix errors happening when source branch of merge request is removed and then restored

See merge request !7568

Signed-off-by: Dmitriy Zaporozhets <dmitriy.zaporozhets@gmail.com>

Adds a flag to reflect whether or not there is data in cycle analytics

See merge request !7622

Remove v-html

## What does this MR do?
Uses string interpolation instead of `v-html` to prevent xss attacks.

## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?

- [ ] [Changelog entry](https://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/changelog.html) added
- [ ] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md)
- [ ] API support added
- Tests
  - [ ] Added for this feature/bug
  - [ ] All builds are passing
- [x] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html)
- [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if it does - rebase it please)
- [ ] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)

## What are the relevant issue numbers?

See merge request !7616

Grapify the projects snippet API

Related to https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/22928

See merge request !7621

nothing to merge in merge request page

Smarter cache invalidation

Fixes https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/23550

See merge request !7360

Allow JIRA references for project snippets

closes #24303

See merge request !7541

Added permissions per stage to cycle analytics endpoint

See merge request !7613

Merge branch '24552-js-environment-timeago-is-not-rendered-and-text-shows-object-object-in-mr-widget' into 'master'

Fix timeago rendering for environment timeago

## What does this MR do?

## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?

## Why was this MR needed?

## Screenshots (if relevant)

## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?

- [ ] [Changelog entry](https://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/changelog.html) added
- [ ] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md)
- [ ] API support added
- Tests
  - [ ] Added for this feature/bug
  - [ ] All builds are passing
- [ ] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html)
- [ ] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [ ] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if it does - rebase it please)
- [ ] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)

## What are the relevant issue numbers?


Closes #24552

See merge request !7539

Merge branch '24616-mr-shows-the-build-for-this-merge-request-failed-although-builds-still-running' into 'master'

Resolve "MR shows "The build for this merge request failed" although builds still running"

Closes #24616

See merge request !7579

This refactors repository caching so it's possible to selectively
refresh certain caches, instead of just expiring and refreshing
everything.

To allow this the various methods that were cached (e.g. "tag_count" and
"readme") use a similar pattern that makes expiring and refreshing
their data much easier.

In this new setup caches are refreshed as follows:

1. After a commit (but before running ProjectCacheWorker) we expire some
   basic caches such as the commit count and repository size.

2. ProjectCacheWorker will recalculate the commit count, repository
   size, then refresh a specific set of caches based on the list of
   files changed in a push payload.

This requires a bunch of changes to the various methods that may be
cached. For one, data should not be cached if a branch used or the
entire repository does not exist. To prevent all these methods from
handling this manually this is taken care of in
Repository#cache_method_output. Some methods still manually check for
the existence of a repository but this result is also cached.

With selective flushing implemented ProjectCacheWorker no longer uses an
exclusive lease for all of its work. Instead this worker only uses a
lease to limit the number of times the repository size is updated as
this is a fairly expensive operation.

Do not create TODO when build is allowed to fail

## What does this MR do?

Do not create a TODO when build that failed is allowed to fail.

## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?

- [x] [Changelog entry](https://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/changelog.html) added
- [x] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md)
- Tests
  - [x] Added for this feature/bug
  - [ ] All builds are passing

## What are the relevant issue numbers?

Closes #22280

See merge request !7618

Also allow merge request to be merged with skipped pipeline and the
"only allow merge when pipeline is green" feature enabled
Signed-off-by: Rémy Coutable <remy@rymai.me>