- 31 Oct, 2017 10 commits
-
-
Sebastien Robin authored
-
Sebastien Robin authored
-
Romain Courteaud authored
-
Romain Courteaud authored
-
Romain Courteaud authored
-
Romain Courteaud authored
rJS gadget uses text content as value
-
Romain Courteaud authored
Keep compatibility.
-
Vincent Bechu authored
-
Vincent Bechu authored
-
Nicolas Wavrant authored
Modules should have the business_application base category set in order to classify them. Normally, the code helper set this category on module creation (https://lab.nexedi.com/nexedi/erp5/blob/master/product/ERP5/bootstrap/erp5_core/SkinTemplateItem/portal_skins/erp5_core/ERP5Site_createModule.py#L15), but it is often forgotten to commit it (as it should be defined explicitely in template_portal_type_base_category_list's bt5 property. This commit tries to fix it globally in all bt5s, using a script : https://lab.nexedi.com/snippets/259. I have tried to respect file modes, file encoding, alphabetical ordering, and "\No newline at end of file" issue in order to not generate useless diffs when other people will commit on these files later. @jerome , @vpelletier , @kazuhiko , @seb : could you have a check to the file formats to tell me if anything is wrong ? /reviewed-on nexedi/erp5!465
-
- 30 Oct, 2017 7 commits
-
-
Nicolas Wavrant authored
All Tickets portal types don't use the same workflow variable (validation_state/simulation_state). By retrieving first the correct workflow variable, we can then deduce the correct getter to access to each object workflow's state /reviewed-on !418
-
Nicolas Wavrant authored
It is a common (CRM principally) use case to search for Organisations using official identifying unique codes, as the registration code or the VAT code. There is currently no way in ERP5 to look for entities using these unique codes, as they are not-generic enough to be indexed. For the same reason, creating a new table(s) to index Entities' identifiers may give something too blured to reach a consensus on. In my opinion fulltext search is a good solution for this case, and it shouldn't create compability issues for current projects. If it is thought necessary, I can also add the Social Security Code (for Organisations/Persons) in the searchable text properties, but it is a more complicated topic as it isn't a public information. @nexedi 's project managers, what are your thoughts on it ? /reviewed-on !463
-
Vincent Bechu authored
/reviewed-on nexedi/erp5!473
-
Tomáš Peterka authored
/reviewed-on nexedi/erp5!472
-
Vincent Bechu authored
And update old header to use it in jabber client
-
Vincent Bechu authored
-
Tomáš Peterka authored
Rename action from "object_*_jio" to "object_jio_*" to be consistent and before it spreads /reviewed-on nexedi/erp5!440
-
- 27 Oct, 2017 15 commits
-
-
Julien Muchembled authored
-
Romain Courteaud authored
-
Romain Courteaud authored
-
Romain Courteaud authored
-
Romain Courteaud authored
-
Sebastien Robin authored
We might need to consider this change globally for all fields later.
-
Vincent Pelletier authored
-
Yusei Tahara authored
… HTML or it fails to open such a large PDF. Thus, now PDF reader opens a PDF using URL. It is faster and stable. /reviewed-on nexedi/erp5!468
-
Yusei Tahara authored
[erp5_officejs_ui_test] Add officejs_setting_gadget to Drive App's sub_gadget in gadget_officejs_page_export.js.
-
Yusei Tahara authored
-
Yusei Tahara authored
-
Yusei Tahara authored
-
Yusei Tahara authored
-
Yusei Tahara authored
-
Yusei Tahara authored
-
- 26 Oct, 2017 8 commits
-
-
Sebastien Robin authored
It requires to include codemirror python syntax highlighting
-
Tomáš Peterka authored
[renderjs_ui] Create new public method `updateForm` rather than misusing `displayFormulatorValidationError`.
-
Tomáš Peterka authored
-
Tomáš Peterka authored
-
Tomáš Peterka authored
-
Tomáš Peterka authored
-
Tomáš Peterka authored
-
Romain Courteaud authored
-