Put auto-generated _getAcquireLocalRoles at the end of mro, removing it
from Base.
Also, document why it is treated specially here.
Also, add _getAcquireLocalRoles methods on a few leaf classes whose
instances fake being portal types, without actually being proper document
instances. At least, the ones which are detected in unit tests. The
proper fix would likely rather be to make them proper document classes,
but this carries data migration concerns which go beyond the scope of
this regression fix (_getAcquireLocalRoles was not possible to override
anymore).

/reviewed-on nexedi/erp5!652

Similar to commit e1d57590

On sites with more than one Zope, this code was causing the cookie to be
bumped each time a form is rendered, causing unneeded cache misses and
slight ZODB bloat (estimated around 100B per form view).

So, Relation Fields in ListBox were ignored during validation as the input
value is compared with the current (default), thus the field could not be
cleared as the value from the actual object was not retrieved at all.

Before, the field value cache was only invalidated on the node where a field
has been modified, so similarly to reset of ZODB Components, implement
synchronization on all nodes through ZODB Cache Cookie.

'REQUEST' exists, then variable 'cell' becomes request value and
breaks matrixbox. I must check what must be done when cell is None.
when cell is explicitly specified as None, is it ok to override,
I do not have answer yet.


git-svn-id: https://svn.erp5.org/repos/public/erp5/trunk@45397 20353a03-c40f-0410-a6d1-a30d3c3de9de

for the compatibility to relation string field. See
MultiRelationStringField.get_value.


git-svn-id: https://svn.erp5.org/repos/public/erp5/trunk@45154 20353a03-c40f-0410-a6d1-a30d3c3de9de

git-svn-id: https://svn.erp5.org/repos/public/erp5/trunk@43408 20353a03-c40f-0410-a6d1-a30d3c3de9de

git-svn-id: https://svn.erp5.org/repos/public/erp5/trunk@40307 20353a03-c40f-0410-a6d1-a30d3c3de9de

git-svn-id: https://svn.erp5.org/repos/public/erp5/trunk@39700 20353a03-c40f-0410-a6d1-a30d3c3de9de

git-svn-id: https://svn.erp5.org/repos/public/erp5/trunk@37959 20353a03-c40f-0410-a6d1-a30d3c3de9de

git-svn-id: https://svn.erp5.org/repos/public/erp5/trunk@37278 20353a03-c40f-0410-a6d1-a30d3c3de9de

Conflicts:
	bt5/erp5_base/bt/revision
	bt5/erp5_simulation/DocumentTemplateItem/InvoiceSimulationRule.py
	bt5/erp5_simulation/bt/revision
	bt5/erp5_trade/SkinTemplateItem/portal_skins/erp5_trade/Base_viewTradeFieldLibrary.xml
	bt5/erp5_trade/bt/change_log
	bt5/erp5_trade/bt/revision
	products/ERP5/Document/BusinessPath.py
	products/ERP5/Document/SimulationMovement.py
	products/ERP5/Document/TradeCondition.py
	products/ERP5/Document/TradeModelLine.py
	products/ERP5/bootstrap/erp5_mysql_innodb_catalog/bt/revision
	products/ERP5Type/ERP5Type.py

git-svn-id: https://svn.erp5.org/repos/public/erp5/sandbox/amount_generator@37129 20353a03-c40f-0410-a6d1-a30d3c3de9de

This modification displays new Tab in ZMI in order to associate the Form with
an Accelerated HTTP Cache Manager.


git-svn-id: https://svn.erp5.org/repos/public/erp5/trunk@36221 20353a03-c40f-0410-a6d1-a30d3c3de9de

folder even if it was not used yet with any business template

git-svn-id: https://svn.erp5.org/repos/public/erp5/trunk@35851 20353a03-c40f-0410-a6d1-a30d3c3de9de

git-svn-id: https://svn.erp5.org/repos/public/erp5/trunk@35518 20353a03-c40f-0410-a6d1-a30d3c3de9de

REQUEST is not None


git-svn-id: https://svn.erp5.org/repos/public/erp5/trunk@35012 20353a03-c40f-0410-a6d1-a30d3c3de9de

contain "_view"

git-svn-id: https://svn.erp5.org/repos/public/erp5/trunk@34522 20353a03-c40f-0410-a6d1-a30d3c3de9de

git-svn-id: https://svn.erp5.org/repos/public/erp5/trunk@34262 20353a03-c40f-0410-a6d1-a30d3c3de9de

on all fields because it can be acquired from another
field in context. ie, from a listbox field.
AttributeError is not raised and get_recursive_orig_value
does not exists neither on that field.
So, test condition on meta_type attribute to avoid non desirable side effects.

git-svn-id: https://svn.erp5.org/repos/public/erp5/trunk@33899 20353a03-c40f-0410-a6d1-a30d3c3de9de

* start to take into account new guideline in the list
  of proposed proxy fields. Keep code commented for now until
  guideline is fully validated

git-svn-id: https://svn.erp5.org/repos/public/erp5/trunk@33162 20353a03-c40f-0410-a6d1-a30d3c3de9de

* Enable request introspection in Unit test environment 
  eg. getattr doesn't work on dummy request


git-svn-id: https://svn.erp5.org/repos/public/erp5/trunk@32800 20353a03-c40f-0410-a6d1-a30d3c3de9de

git-svn-id: https://svn.erp5.org/repos/public/erp5/trunk@32798 20353a03-c40f-0410-a6d1-a30d3c3de9de

git-svn-id: https://svn.erp5.org/repos/public/erp5/trunk@32415 20353a03-c40f-0410-a6d1-a30d3c3de9de

git-svn-id: https://svn.erp5.org/repos/public/erp5/trunk@32380 20353a03-c40f-0410-a6d1-a30d3c3de9de

to existing fields in the current form. For now this only
works for skin folder within a same business template.

git-svn-id: https://svn.erp5.org/repos/public/erp5/trunk@32308 20353a03-c40f-0410-a6d1-a30d3c3de9de