- 11 Jun, 2015 2 commits
-
-
Jérome Perrin authored
-
Aurel authored
-
- 10 Jun, 2015 7 commits
-
-
Aurel authored
-
Sebastien Robin authored
-
Kazuhiko Shiozaki authored
-
Aurel authored
-
Jérome Perrin authored
proxify and set more columns
-
Jérome Perrin authored
-
Yusei Tahara authored
Make sure that catalog knows portal_type column and reference column. If catalog does not know those columns, then it will fetch all cataloged objects and will cause memory bloat. This can happen when MariaDB server disk is full.
-
- 09 Jun, 2015 4 commits
-
-
Kazuhiko Shiozaki authored
-
Sebastien Robin authored
Before, reindex was not called when you changed only a [Multi] relation field. So it was possible to have SQL data not up to date after a change by user. Though, most of the time this was not an issue. Usually relation fields calls Base_edit. And even if there is no change and no reindex done by edit itself, since we often have edit_workflow associated to documents, we usually have a reindexing. But since we should keep the usage of edit_workflow optional, we have to call proper setter to make sure to have updated SQL data.
-
Xiaowu Zhang authored
-
Xiaowu Zhang authored
-
- 08 Jun, 2015 3 commits
-
-
Jérome Perrin authored
-
Xiaowu Zhang authored
-
Jérome Perrin authored
test was lost in merge / rebase
-
- 05 Jun, 2015 4 commits
-
-
Sebastien Robin authored
For some projects, it could be very useful to setup multiple supply line directly at ressource level. Therefore make the user interface supporting it. Though, for project not using multiple supply per ressource, the user interface will not change (listbox appears only when there is multiple supply lines)
-
Xiaowu Zhang authored
-
Jérome Perrin authored
If a transaction has the same source section and destination section, there was a risk of showing the wrong side of the transaction. Test that both section and nodes are the same instead. There is still a risk, of showing something wrong if source and destination are also same, but such transaction would be non sense anyway.
-
Jérome Perrin authored
A previous operation might have poluted the request
-
- 03 Jun, 2015 1 commit
-
-
Xiaowu Zhang authored
If a sub field has a tales expression for it's value, need to use it firstly.
-
- 02 Jun, 2015 19 commits
-
-
Sven Franck authored
-
Xiaowu Zhang authored
-
Xiaowu Zhang authored
-
Xiaowu Zhang authored
-
Xiaowu Zhang authored
-
Xiaowu Zhang authored
-
Xiaowu Zhang authored
-
Xiaowu Zhang authored
-
Xiaowu Zhang authored
-
Xiaowu Zhang authored
-
Xiaowu Zhang authored
-
Xiaowu Zhang authored
-
Xiaowu Zhang authored
The idea to clean input after submit: in pt form view editable gadget, after submit, it will check if there has a field which should regenerate, if yes, it will ask it's parent gadget to provide new erp5 site info, then use it to regenerate sub field
-
Xiaowu Zhang authored
-
Xiaowu Zhang authored
Fix bug: when a field's enable value is defined by TALES, it'll not be in group list
-
Xiaowu Zhang authored
-
Xiaowu Zhang authored
-
Xiaowu Zhang authored
-
Xiaowu Zhang authored
-