1. 02 May, 2023 1 commit
    • Jérome Perrin's avatar
      worklfow: save state permissions sorted · f4cd9eb2
      Jérome Perrin authored
      When editing a state permission mapping the roles were not sorted,
      because WorkflowState_getPermissionMatrixContext uses a set. Sort
      before setting the attribute, to prevent useless diffs in ZODB history
      and business template.
      f4cd9eb2
  2. 27 Apr, 2023 2 commits
  3. 26 Apr, 2023 2 commits
  4. 25 Apr, 2023 1 commit
  5. 21 Apr, 2023 2 commits
    • Nicolas Wavrant's avatar
      erp5_core: fix addToDate when removing a month · c1dfe5d8
      Nicolas Wavrant authored
      See merge request nexedi/erp5!1768
      c1dfe5d8
    • Nicolas Wavrant's avatar
      erp5_core: fix addToDate when removing a month · 34d26a74
      Nicolas Wavrant authored
      The way addToDate was working with dates was not good, and creating
      confusion when removing 1 month from the last days of a 31-day month, as
      the previous day had less days than the current month:
      
      date = DateTime(2023, 5, 31)
      print date
      print addToDate(date, month=-1)
      > 2023/05/31 00:00:00 GMT+2
      > 2023/05/01 00:00:00 GMT+2
      
      This was even more confusing in March, with february having only 28
      days:
      
      date = DateTime(2023, 3, 31)
      print date
      print addToDate(date, month=-1)
      > 2023/03/31 00:00:00 GMT+2
      > 2023/03/03 00:00:00 GMT+2
      
      The new behavior is to, when removing a month, if the new day of the new
      month is more than the number of days in month to default to the last
      day of the month. For exemple, removing one month from 31/05 becomes
      30/04, and from there it will add/remove the days as necessary.
      
      The real issue being that removing a month is ambiguous and can mean
      a different thing for different people.
      
      For reference, the reference implementation of timedelta in python
      doesn't support adding months:
      
      https://docs.python.org/3/library/datetime.html#datetime.timedelta
      
      I hope my solution will make the more sense in ERP5's context.
      34d26a74
  6. 20 Apr, 2023 1 commit
  7. 17 Apr, 2023 1 commit
  8. 12 Apr, 2023 1 commit
  9. 11 Apr, 2023 1 commit
  10. 10 Apr, 2023 2 commits
  11. 07 Apr, 2023 1 commit
    • Jérome Perrin's avatar
      open_api: new business template · 36948198
      Jérome Perrin authored
      This is a simple framework to implement services in ERP5 based on an
      OpenAPI document.
      
      A new type "Open API Type" (similar to "Base Type") is introduced,
      this is responsible for the definition of operations and types.
      The Open API document is set as text content of the Open API Type
      and can be edited from the Open API Type.
      
      For each service, a new portal type will be created. The portal type
      use OpenAPIService as class and this is responsible for serving
      requests. The process of serving requests is:
       - find the matching operation from the request method and request
         path
       - extracting request parameters and request body using the parameter
         definitions from the Open API Document
       - validate parameters and request body according to the schema from
         the Open API document
       - finding the method, this is done by using _getTypeBasedMethod with
         the operationId
       - calling the method and formatting the result or handling error.
         The default handling of errors is to reply with rfc7807 json
         responses, but it can be customized by defining an
         `handleException` type based method.
      
      Typically, the services will be created in portal_web_services. From
      there, there is also a view using a new SwaggerUI gadget to try out
      the API.
      
      What's not supported:
       - OpenAPI document in YAML format is only partially supported and
         have some limitations over JSON:
          - On python2 the order of operations is lost, the lookup of
            operations is not made in the order of the operations from the
            document. Also the operations are not in order in the SwaggerUI
            gadget.
          - The text editor does not provide rich editing of YAML
       - "partial" parameters in path elements ( /users/{user_id} is
         supported, but /documents/report.{format} is not )
       - XML (decoding of request bodies and parsing of responses) is not
         supported.
      36948198
  12. 06 Apr, 2023 2 commits
  13. 05 Apr, 2023 4 commits
  14. 03 Apr, 2023 6 commits
  15. 31 Mar, 2023 6 commits
  16. 29 Mar, 2023 1 commit
  17. 28 Mar, 2023 3 commits
    • Rafael Monnerat's avatar
    • Kirill Smelkov's avatar
      pylint: Add support for XLTE · f750cbee
      Kirill Smelkov authored
      XLTE(*) follows the same top-level packaging structure like
      wendelin.core does.
      
      Registration is done via new `register_xpkg` function instead of just
      loop so that pkgname argument is properly captured in created lambda and
      does not change after going to next iteration.
      
      (*) https://lab.nexedi.com/kirr/xlte
      
      /reviewed-by @jerome
      /reviewed-on nexedi/erp5!1762
      f750cbee
    • Kirill Smelkov's avatar
      pylint: Fix wendelin transform to yield module with a .name · 421d6068
      Kirill Smelkov authored
      In 5796a17a (core_test: Add test to make sure that wendelin.core
      basically works) I added wendelin_transform to pylint so that the
      checker could recognize wendelin.core's special wendelin top-level
      module/package and handle ok
      
      	from wendelin.bigarray.array_zodb import ZBigArray
      
      this works, but e.g. for plain
      
      	import wendelin			or
      	from wendelin import bigarray
      
      pylint currenly fails with
      
      	AssertionError: explicit relative import, but no context_file?
      
      To better see what is going on let's conside the following test program
      
      	"""ZZZ"""
      
      	from wendelin.bigarray.array_zodb import ZBigArray
      	from wendelin import bigarray
      
      	def main():
      	    """main"""
      	    _ = ZBigArray
      
      and run pylint on it. Here is what it gives:
      
                wendelin_transform Module(wendelin)
                -> Module()
      
          visit_from From()
            basename: wendelin.bigarray.array_zodb
            names:    [('ZBigArray', None)]
            modnode:  Module(test)
              get_imported_module From() wendelin.bigarray.array_zodb
            importedmodnode: Module(wendelin.bigarray.array_zodb)
          ('_add_imported_module', <From() l.3 [test] at 0x7ff214b4cb90>, 'wendelin.bigarray.array_zodb.ZBigArray')
                wendelin_transform Module(wendelin)
                -> Module()
      
          visit_from From()
            basename: wendelin
            names:    [('bigarray', None)]
            modnode:  Module(test)
              get_imported_module From() wendelin
                wendelin_transform Module(wendelin)
                -> Module()
            importedmodnode: Module()
          ************* Module test
          W:  4, 0: Relative import 'wendelin', should be '' (relative-import)
          ('_add_imported_module', <From() l.4 [test] at 0x7ff214b4cf50>, '.bigarray')
          Traceback (most recent call last):
            File "./x.py", line 22, in <module>
              Run(['test.py', '--reports=n'], exit=False)
            File "/home/kirr/src/tools/py/pylint/pylint/lint.py", line 1332, in __init__
              linter.check(args)
            File "/home/kirr/src/tools/py/pylint/pylint/lint.py", line 747, in check
              self._do_check(files_or_modules)
            File "/home/kirr/src/tools/py/pylint/pylint/lint.py", line 869, in _do_check
              self.check_astroid_module(ast_node, walker, rawcheckers, tokencheckers)
            File "/home/kirr/src/tools/py/pylint/pylint/lint.py", line 946, in check_astroid_module
              walker.walk(ast_node)
            File "/home/kirr/src/tools/py/pylint/pylint/utils.py", line 874, in walk
              self.walk(child)
            File "/home/kirr/src/tools/py/pylint/pylint/utils.py", line 871, in walk
              cb(astroid)
            File "/home/kirr/src/tools/py/pylint/pylint/checkers/imports.py", line 288, in visit_from
              self._add_imported_module(node, '%s.%s' % (importedmodnode.name, name))
            File "/home/kirr/src/tools/py/pylint/pylint/checkers/imports.py", line 328, in _add_imported_module
              importedmodname = get_module_part(importedmodname)
            File "/home/kirr/src/tools/py/astroid/astroid/modutils.py", line 359, in get_module_part
              'explicit relative import, but no context_file?'
          AssertionError: explicit relative import, but no context_file?
      
      we see that the line
      
      	from wendelin.bigarray.array_zodb import ZBigArray
      
      corresponds to
      
      	('_add_imported_module', <From() l.3 [test] at 0x7ff214b4cb90>, 'wendelin.bigarray.array_zodb.ZBigArray')
      
      and the line
      
      	from wendelin import bigarray
      
      corresponds to
      
      	('_add_imported_module', <From() l.4 [test] at 0x7ff214b4cf50>, '.bigarray')
      
      notice that in the latter case there is no 'wendelin' prefix and the
      import goes as just '.bigarray' instead of 'wendelin.bigarray' which
      leads to further crash in get_module_part.
      
      -> Fix it by initializing wendelin module yielded by wendelin_transform
      with .name set. Not sure why it is working longer imports without that.
      
      Without the fix added test breaks as
      
          .../instance/slappart5/bin$ ./runUnitTest -v -v -v  testDynamicClassGeneration.TestZodbModuleComponent
          ...
          Running Unit tests of <class 'testDynamicClassGeneration.TestZodbModuleComponent'>
          ok
          testImportVersionedComponentOnly (testDynamicClassGeneration.TestZodbModuleComponent) ... ok
          testInvalidId (testDynamicClassGeneration.TestZodbModuleComponent) ... ok
          testInvalidSourceCode (testDynamicClassGeneration.TestZodbModuleComponent) ... ok
          testModuleSecurityInfo (testDynamicClassGeneration.TestZodbModuleComponent) ... ok
          testPylint (testDynamicClassGeneration.TestZodbModuleComponent) ... FAIL
          testPylintAstroidModuleGeneratedOnce (testDynamicClassGeneration.TestZodbModuleComponent) ... ok
          testPylintNamedtupleUnicodeLiteralsRegression (testDynamicClassGeneration.TestZodbModuleComponent) ... ok
          testReferenceWithReservedKeywords (testDynamicClassGeneration.TestZodbModuleComponent) ... ok
          testValidateInvalidateDelete (testDynamicClassGeneration.TestZodbModuleComponent) ... ok
          testVersionPriority (testDynamicClassGeneration.TestZodbModuleComponent) ... ok
          testVersionWithReservedKeywords (testDynamicClassGeneration.TestZodbModuleComponent) ... ok
          testWorkflowErrorMessage (testDynamicClassGeneration.TestZodbModuleComponent)
          Check that validation error messages are stored in workflow ... ok
      
          ======================================================================
          FAIL: testPylint (testDynamicClassGeneration.TestZodbModuleComponent)
          ----------------------------------------------------------------------
          Traceback (most recent call last):
            File ".../parts/erp5/Products/ERP5Type/tests/testDynamicClassGeneration.py", line 2347, in testPylint
              component.checkSourceCode()
            File ".../parts/erp5/product/ERP5Type/mixin/component.py", line 329, in checkSourceCode
              return checkPythonSourceCode(self.getTextContent(), self.getPortalType())
            File ".../parts/erp5/product/ERP5Type/Utils.py", line 540, in checkPythonSourceCode
              Run(args, reporter=TextReporter(output_file), exit=False)
            File ".../develop-eggs/pylint-1.4.4+slapospatched002-py2.7.egg/pylint/lint.py", line 1332, in __init__
              linter.check(args)
            File ".../develop-eggs/pylint-1.4.4+slapospatched002-py2.7.egg/pylint/lint.py", line 747, in check
              self._do_check(files_or_modules)
            File ".../develop-eggs/pylint-1.4.4+slapospatched002-py2.7.egg/pylint/lint.py", line 869, in _do_check
              self.check_astroid_module(ast_node, walker, rawcheckers, tokencheckers)
            File ".../develop-eggs/pylint-1.4.4+slapospatched002-py2.7.egg/pylint/lint.py", line 946, in check_astroid_module
              walker.walk(ast_node)
            File ".../develop-eggs/pylint-1.4.4+slapospatched002-py2.7.egg/pylint/utils.py", line 874, in walk
              self.walk(child)
            File ".../develop-eggs/pylint-1.4.4+slapospatched002-py2.7.egg/pylint/utils.py", line 871, in walk
              cb(astroid)
            File ".../develop-eggs/pylint-1.4.4+slapospatched002-py2.7.egg/pylint/checkers/imports.py", line 253, in visit_import
              self._add_imported_module(node, importedmodnode.name)
            File ".../develop-eggs/pylint-1.4.4+slapospatched002-py2.7.egg/pylint/checkers/imports.py", line 319, in _add_imported_module
              importedmodname = get_module_part(importedmodname)
            File ".../develop-eggs/astroid-1.3.8+slapospatched001-py2.7.egg/astroid/modutils.py", line 359, in get_module_part
              'explicit relative import, but no context_file?'
          AssertionError: explicit relative import, but no context_file?
      
          ----------------------------------------------------------------------
          Ran 13 tests in 137.609s
      
          FAILED (failures=1)
      
      /helped-and-reviewed-by @jerome
      /reviewed-on nexedi/erp5!1762
      421d6068
  18. 27 Mar, 2023 1 commit
  19. 25 Mar, 2023 1 commit
  20. 24 Mar, 2023 1 commit
    • Rafael Monnerat's avatar
      BusinessTemplate: Check the existence of property before re-raise · d36f312e
      Rafael Monnerat authored
        On the automatic upgrade some bt5 (erp5_core) can be upgraded
        before erp5_property_sheets. Since, it isnt a problem if this happens
        if no Mixin configuration is present, it is better directly check the
        existence of the property on the bt5.
      
        In general we expect that erp5_property_sheets is upgraded before any
        other bt5 with TypeMixin definition.
      d36f312e