- 20 May, 2024 40 commits
-
-
Carlos Ramos Carreño authored
Newer versions of polib accept only unicode strings in the `pofile` function (because they check if they start by the decoded version of the BOM). I changed the `data` that is passed to `pofile` to be a unicode string in Python 2 too. This seems to work locally in my old version of polib, so that at least the old behavior should be kept the same.
-
Carlos Ramos Carreño authored
- The warnings are compared in a set instead of a list, as we do not care of how many times is the warning raised. - The warning filter is added inside the context manager, as recommended in https://docs.python.org/2.7/library/warnings.html#testing-warnings . - We change the `clear` method of list, using `del` instead, as the `clear` method was added on Python 3.3.
-
Jérome Perrin authored
-
Jérome Perrin authored
-
Jérome Perrin authored
-
Jérome Perrin authored
-
Jérome Perrin authored
-
Jérome Perrin authored
-
Jérome Perrin authored
-
Jérome Perrin authored
-
Jérome Perrin authored
-
Jérome Perrin authored
-
Jérome Perrin authored
-
Jérome Perrin authored
-
Jérome Perrin authored
-
Jérome Perrin authored
-
Jérome Perrin authored
-
Jérome Perrin authored
-
Jérome Perrin authored
-
Jérome Perrin authored
-
Jérome Perrin authored
-
Jérome Perrin authored
-
Jérome Perrin authored
-
Jérome Perrin authored
-
Jérome Perrin authored
-
Jérome Perrin authored
-
Jérome Perrin authored
-
Carlos Ramos Carreño authored
-
Carlos Ramos Carreño authored
-
Carlos Ramos Carreño authored
-
Carlos Ramos Carreño authored
Instead of using encode/decode is it better to use str2bytes and bytes2str, so that the types in Python 2 are unchanged. More important, this prevents the double encoding of bytes, which causes problems when they have non-ASCII data encoded.
-
Carlos Ramos Carreño authored
Errors were being raised for returning `None` in Python 2 (due to a missing else branch) and for re-encoding bytes in Python 2. I changed the code to use str2bytes in the cases where bytes are expected.
-
Jérome Perrin authored
-
Jérome Perrin authored
-
Jérome Perrin authored
-
Jérome Perrin authored
-
Jérome Perrin authored
-
Jérome Perrin authored
-
Kazuhiko Shiozaki authored
with ROUND_DOWN, we have a different behaviour between py2/py3, that caused failures in erp5_simplified_invoicing:testTradeModelLine. Here is what happened in _round(1.9999999999999998) in bt5/erp5_simulation/DocumentTemplateItem/portal_components/document.erp5.FloatEquivalenceTester.py * py2 decimal.Decimal(str(1.9999999999999998)).quantize(decimal.Decimal('0.000001'), 'ROUND_DOWN') => Decimal('2.000000') (because str(1.9999999999999998) is '2.0') * py3 decimal.Decimal(str(1.9999999999999998)).quantize(decimal.Decimal('0.000001'), 'ROUND_DOWN') => Decimal('1.999999') (because str(1.9999999999999998) is '1.9999999999999998') But ROUND_DOWN result of 1.9999999999999998 with 0.000001 precision should be 1.999999 thus py2 behaviour is wrong.
-
Jérome Perrin authored
-