Commit 724eef62 authored by Robert Speicher's avatar Robert Speicher

Revert "Merge branch 'rs-update-rubocop-rspec' into 'master'"

This reverts commit 70faf5fd, reversing
changes made to 2307eb84.
parent 870324b5
......@@ -767,33 +767,26 @@ Rails/ScopeArgs:
RSpec/AnyInstance:
Enabled: false
# Check for expectations where `be(...)` can replace `eql(...)`.
RSpec/BeEql:
Enabled: false
# Check that the first argument to the top level describe is a constant.
# Check that the first argument to the top level describe is the tested class or
# module.
RSpec/DescribeClass:
Enabled: false
# Checks that tests use `described_class`.
RSpec/DescribedClass:
Enabled: false
# Checks that the second argument to `describe` specifies a method.
# Use `described_class` for tested class / module.
RSpec/DescribeMethod:
Enabled: false
# Checks if an example group does not include any tests.
RSpec/EmptyExampleGroup:
# Checks that the second argument to top level describe is the tested method
# name.
RSpec/DescribedClass:
Enabled: false
CustomIncludeMethods: []
# Checks for long examples.
# Checks for long example.
RSpec/ExampleLength:
Enabled: false
Max: 5
# Checks that example descriptions do not start with "should".
# Do not use should when describing your tests.
RSpec/ExampleWording:
Enabled: false
CustomTransform:
......@@ -802,10 +795,6 @@ RSpec/ExampleWording:
not: does not
IgnoredWords: []
# Checks for `expect(...)` calls containing literal values.
RSpec/ExpectActual:
Enabled: false
# Checks the file and folder naming of the spec file.
RSpec/FilePath:
Enabled: false
......@@ -817,65 +806,19 @@ RSpec/FilePath:
RSpec/Focus:
Enabled: true
# Checks the arguments passed to `before`, `around`, and `after`.
RSpec/HookArgument:
Enabled: false
EnforcedStyle: implicit
# Check that a consistent implict expectation style is used.
# TODO (rspeicher): Available in rubocop-rspec 1.8.0
# RSpec/ImplicitExpect:
# Enabled: true
# EnforcedStyle: is_expected
# Checks for the usage of instance variables.
RSpec/InstanceVariable:
Enabled: false
# Checks for `subject` definitions that come after `let` definitions.
RSpec/LeadingSubject:
Enabled: false
# Checks unreferenced `let!` calls being used for test setup.
RSpec/LetSetup:
Enabled: false
# Check that chains of messages are not being stubbed.
RSpec/MessageChain:
Enabled: false
# Checks for consistent message expectation style.
RSpec/MessageExpectation:
Enabled: false
EnforcedStyle: allow
# Checks for multiple top level describes.
# Checks for multiple top-level describes.
RSpec/MultipleDescribes:
Enabled: false
# Checks if examples contain too many `expect` calls.
RSpec/MultipleExpectations:
Enabled: false
Max: 1
# Checks for explicitly referenced test subjects.
RSpec/NamedSubject:
Enabled: false
# Checks for nested example groups.
RSpec/NestedGroups:
Enabled: false
MaxNesting: 2
# Checks for consistent method usage for negating expectations.
# Enforces the usage of the same method on all negative message expectations.
RSpec/NotToNot:
EnforcedStyle: not_to
Enabled: true
# Checks for stubbed test subjects.
RSpec/SubjectStub:
Enabled: false
# Prefer using verifying doubles over normal doubles.
RSpec/VerifiedDoubles:
Enabled: false
......@@ -298,7 +298,7 @@ group :development, :test do
gem 'spring-commands-teaspoon', '~> 0.0.2'
gem 'rubocop', '~> 0.42.0', require: false
gem 'rubocop-rspec', '~> 1.7.0', require: false
gem 'rubocop-rspec', '~> 1.5.0', require: false
gem 'scss_lint', '~> 0.47.0', require: false
gem 'haml_lint', '~> 0.18.2', require: false
gem 'simplecov', '0.12.0', require: false
......
......@@ -626,8 +626,8 @@ GEM
rainbow (>= 1.99.1, < 3.0)
ruby-progressbar (~> 1.7)
unicode-display_width (~> 1.0, >= 1.0.1)
rubocop-rspec (1.7.0)
rubocop (>= 0.42.0)
rubocop-rspec (1.5.0)
rubocop (>= 0.40.0)
ruby-fogbugz (0.2.1)
crack (~> 0.4)
ruby-prof (0.15.9)
......@@ -943,7 +943,7 @@ DEPENDENCIES
rspec-rails (~> 3.5.0)
rspec-retry (~> 0.4.5)
rubocop (~> 0.42.0)
rubocop-rspec (~> 1.7.0)
rubocop-rspec (~> 1.5.0)
ruby-fogbugz (~> 0.2.1)
ruby-prof (~> 0.15.9)
sanitize (~> 2.0)
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment