- 13 Oct, 2016 36 commits
-
-
Rémy Coutable authored
Signed-off-by: Rémy Coutable <remy@rymai.me>
-
Rémy Coutable authored
Also improve API styleguide Signed-off-by: Rémy Coutable <remy@rymai.me>
-
Rémy Coutable authored
Signed-off-by: Rémy Coutable <remy@rymai.me>
-
Rémy Coutable authored
Sort API mounts ## What does this MR do? Sort the API mounts. ## Why was this MR needed? The API mounts are unsorted. See merge request !6831
-
Rémy Coutable authored
Convert unicode emojis to images. ## Why was this MR needed? For better cross platform interoperability with emojis. Closes #22591 See merge request !6829
-
Sean McGivern authored
Use defined colour for a language when available ## What does this MR do? This MR changes the colours of the different languages in the language graph. It now uses the colour set in Linguist instead of the first six characters of the SHA256'd language name where possible. If Linguist has no colour defined for a given language, it falls back to the old method of finding a colour. I talked with @connorshea about creating this MR [on Twitter](https://twitter.com/connorjshea/status/784390886222286849) a few hours earlier. Here's also an older [tweet from May](https://twitter.com/nilsding/status/737018807223496708) where we discussed some possible improvements to the graph. ## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check? Hopefully none ;) ## Why was this MR needed? Aesthetics. ## Screenshots (if relevant) Before: ![language_colours_before](/uploads/6b4bac784860da746d58708bdd6bba39/language_colours_before.png) After: ![language_colours_after](/uploads/98818ebf48ffb47e6b785120e69b0b6c/language_colours_after.png) ## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria? - [ ] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added - [ ] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md) - [ ] API support added - Tests - [ ] Added for this feature/bug - [ ] All builds are passing - [ ] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html) - [ ] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides) - [ ] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if it does - rebase it please) - [ ] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits) ## What are the relevant issue numbers? - #12455 See merge request !6748
-
Dmitriy Zaporozhets authored
Loosen requirement on request_store version This gem follows semantic versioning and will not introduce breaking changes in a minor version. See https://github.com/steveklabnik/request_store#semantic-versioning Closes https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/2868 See merge request !6853
-
Sean McGivern authored
Refactoring Issues Board ## What does this MR do? This MR aims to minimize conflicts between the CE issues board feature with EE multiple boards feature. ## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check? ## Why was this MR needed? To avoid a lot of conflicts with EE multiple boards feature. ## Screenshots (if relevant) ## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria? - [ ] ~~[CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added~~ - [ ] ~~[Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md)~~ - [x] API support added - Tests - [X] Added for this feature/bug - [ ] All builds are passing - [x] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html) - [X] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides) - [ ] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please) - [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits) ## What are the relevant issue numbers? https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ee/issues/929 https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ee/issues/1084 See merge request !6727
-
Marin Jankovski authored
Use forked github-markup gem to enable python3 support with omnibus ## What does this MR do? Changes the version of `github-markup` gem we are using, to be the forked one with the changes to enable python3 support. The change is backward compatible with users using Python 2, and will only be running with Python 3 in Omnibus (with the help of a custom patch we apply there). ## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check? Make sure backward compatibility isn't broken for source installs. ## For the release manager You need to make sure you pickup into stable this merge request as well (for omnibus): https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/omnibus-gitlab/merge_requests/1015 as it's part of the fix, otherwise package will fail to build. ## Why was this MR needed? We had some regressions with .rst rendering that were fixed, but still some issues with encoding persisted (this MR will fix that). See: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/21696 ## Screenshots (if relevant) ## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria? - [ ] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added - [ ] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md) - [ ] API support added - Tests - [ ] Added for this feature/bug - [ ] All builds are passing - [ ] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html) - [ ] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides) - [ ] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please) - [ ] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits) ## What are the relevant issue numbers? * gitlab-org/gitlab-ce#21696 * gitlab-org/gitlab-ce#22748 * gitlab-com/support-forum#1097 See merge request !6659
-
Rémy Coutable authored
GrapeDSL for variables See merge request !6838
-
Rémy Coutable authored
Merge branch '23234-deleting-a-milestone-removes-source-branch-deletion-options-of-associated-merge-requests' into 'master' Maintain "force_remove_source_branch" options on Merge Request unless specified ## What does this MR do? Fixes a problem where Merge Requests were losing the state associated with the flag to remove the source branch upon merge * Closes #23234 * Closes #23191 * Closes #19351 See merge request !6817
-
Robert Speicher authored
Keep a copy of gems needed by our releases as CI artifacts This is meant as insurance in case a gem GitLab needs is ever removed from rubygems.org. After we merge this, all future GitLab tags will have a CI artifact archive containing all the gems (for all platforms) specified in Gemfile.lock for that revision. Only runs on tags (so we don't constantly create 50MB gem cache bundles). See merge request !6617
-
Robert Speicher authored
This gem follows semantic versioning and will not introduce breaking changes in a minor version. See https://github.com/steveklabnik/request_store#semantic-versioning Closes https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/2868
-
Achilleas Pipinellis authored
Add job to trigger a docs.gitlab.com build ## What does this MR do? Add a job to build the docs site every time master tests pass. ## What are the relevant issue numbers? https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/doc-gitlab-com/issues/56 See merge request !6850
-
Douwe Maan authored
Implement second iteration of cycle analytics - Change in data measurement Part of https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/22458 Measure everything that happened in the given time range, not only what's been pushed to production. With the exception of the staging and production stages. - [x] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added - [x] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md) - Tests - [x] Added for this feature/bug - [x] All builds are passing - [x] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html) - [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides) - [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if it does - rebase it please) - [ ] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits) See merge request !6798
-
Achilleas Pipinellis authored
Fix secret names in HA docs See https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ee/issues/1110#note_16854559. I don't think this needs a CHANGELOG item really. See merge request !6845
-
Achilleas Pipinellis authored
-
Gabriel Mazetto authored
-
Gabriel Mazetto authored
-
Johan H authored
-
Georg G authored
-
Robert Schilling authored
-
Fatih Acet authored
Fixed default branch dropdown not converting to select2 ## What does this MR do? The LFS dropdown doesn't have the `data` attribute & it isn't needed because it doesn't hide/show any elements. This filters out the `<select>` without that attribute. ## What are the relevant issue numbers? Closes #23200 See merge request !6810
-
Fatih Acet authored
Fix overflow to show grouped builds arrow ## What does this MR do? Removes overflow style so that the arrow shows up again ## Screenshots (if relevant) Before: ![Screen_Shot_2016-10-11_at_9.11.55_AM](/uploads/92d2a0c34d2af050e58468c8d61f4cd3/Screen_Shot_2016-10-11_at_9.11.55_AM.png) After: ![Screen_Shot_2016-10-11_at_9.11.41_AM](/uploads/2c4c422a21fb6450d00ae638aef29d89/Screen_Shot_2016-10-11_at_9.11.41_AM.png) Scrolling: ![Screen_Shot_2016-10-11_at_9.40.36_AM](/uploads/e5b1e3125d881c5882cf199026110d48/Screen_Shot_2016-10-11_at_9.40.36_AM.png) See merge request !6808
-
Kamil Trzciński authored
Trigger Merge When Pipeline Succeeds on pipeline event ## What does this MR do? This MR is meant to improve merge when build succeeds triggers, which has an impact on performance. - [x] Move Merge When Build Succeeds trigger from commit status to pipeline event - [x] Drop support for triggering event for branches that include commit status submitted without branch (no longer relevant) - [x] Perform Merge When Pipeline Succeeds asynchronously to improve performance and avoid race conditions - [x] Add missing feature test that verifies if MWBS feature actually works and merges merge requests - [x] Update the documentation to reflect change in the behavior Moved to separate merge request: - [ ] Rename Merge When Build Succeeds to Merge When Pipeline Succeeds - [ ] Update documentation to reflect name change for this feature ## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria? - [x] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added - Tests - [x] Added for this feature/bug - [x] All builds are passing See merge request !6675
-
Fatih Acet authored
Ensure that whitespace doesn't cause adding members to fail I recently had to debug an issue where adding users wasn't working. It turned out that I was hitting "space" to confirm a `select2` dialog, and the server would throw out the whole email address because it was invalid. It looked as though GitLab was entirely ignoring my add-member request. Here's a fun gif: ![out](/uploads/5c306addb764067bca54add3b7a53c6c/out.gif) Ideally, there should also be validation client-side, so that the server doesn't need to silently fail, and the user will know what's going wrong. I'll look into creating an issue for that. Additionally, GitLab already seems to trim email addresses, sometimes? If you add _two_ address, with spaces, then the `value` of the `user_ids` DOM element will have the first `n-1` addresses without spaces. Weird. **TL;DR: Now spaces are always trimmed from new-member email addresses.** See merge request !3443
-
Mark Fletcher authored
-
Fatih Acet authored
Fix "Copy to clipboard" action button has a mismatching white background. ## What does this MR do? Adds a class to all the clipboard icons which removes the extra padding. It also fixes some odd overlay when over the clipboard icon in commits list. ## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check? No. ## Why was this MR needed? To fix the extra padding and background color that was visible when it should not be ## Screenshots (if relevant) ![commits_list](/uploads/f988e2e2e2aea41fe3f7fe41c8a857ef/commits_list.png) ![file](/uploads/ce97909fc4e602af47fea46b8fffb7ad/file.png) ## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria? - [x] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added - [ ] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md) - [ ] API support added - Tests - [ ] Added for this feature/bug - [x] All builds are passing - [x] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html) - [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides) - [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if it does - rebase it please) - [ ] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits) ## What are the relevant issue numbers? Closes #22635 See merge request !6785
-
Rémy Coutable authored
Improve appearance_spec and deploy_key_spec In appearance_spec.rb we can use build instead create record in db. In deploy_key_spec.rb we can remove unused code. See merge request !6819
-
Sean McGivern authored
-
Rémy Coutable authored
Union examples in event spec for speed up ## What does this MR do? Increase tests speed for event model. ## Why was this MR needed? This change saves about 15-18 seconds. See merge request !6821
-
Z.J. van de Weg authored
-
Yorick Peterse authored
Update to gitlab-shell 3.6.6 ## What does this MR do? This updates gitlab-shell to version 3.6.6 ## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria? - [x] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added - Tests - [ ] All builds are passing - [x] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html) - [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides) - [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if it does - rebase it please) - [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits) ## What are the relevant issue numbers? See merge request !6830
-
James Lopez authored
-
Semyon Pupkov authored
-
Georg G authored
-
- 12 Oct, 2016 4 commits
-
-
Fatih Acet authored
Document Capybara errors from es6 in es5 file. ## What does this MR do? Documents an error that I've banged my head against twice now. ## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check? ## Why was this MR needed? The greater good. ## Screenshots (if relevant) ## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria? - [ ] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added - [x] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md) - [ ] API support added - Tests - [ ] Added for this feature/bug - [ ] All builds are passing - [ ] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html) - [ ] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides) - [ ] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if it does - rebase it please) - [ ] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits) ## What are the relevant issue numbers? See merge request !6836
-
Stan Hu authored
Fix step number and token param in URL example. Fix gitlab-rails command code formatting. See merge request !6791
-
Douwe Maan authored
Improve merge request versions compare logic ## What does this MR do? Changes the way how we compare between for merge request versions ## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check? no ## Why was this MR needed? So when I squash+rebase my commit I can get more accurate diff on what changed between versions ## Screenshots (if relevant) in discussion (below) ## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria? - [x] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added - [ ] ~~[Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md)~~ - [ ] ~~API support added~~ - Tests - [x] Added for this feature/bug - [x] All builds are passing - [x] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html) - [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides) - [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please) - [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits) ## What are the relevant issue numbers? https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/22368, https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/22721 See merge request !6589
-
Grzegorz Bizon authored
* master: Update health_check gem to `~> 2.2.0` API: Version information Revert "Merge branch 'tests-use-tmpfs' into 'master'" Added documentation chapter for Git attributes Use activerecord_sane_schema_dumper Add a separate stage for bundle check Add a bundle check step to ensure dependencies are correct Create a new /templates API namespace Add disabled delete button to protected branches Make spec deterministic refactors tests because of gitlab-test repository changes Addresses Robert's feedback Speed up specs for GET /projects/:id/events API: New /users/:id/events endpoint writes tests to verify the issue is solved and fixes breaking issues. removes inconsistency regarding tagging immediately as merged once you create a branch using new branch button and adds changelog entry
-