- 12 Sep, 2016 2 commits
-
-
Douwe Maan authored
Fix API issues sorting ## What does this MR do? Fix the sorting of issues in the API. ## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check? Instead of removing the '_at' suffix manually, we could add those versions to the `Sortable` concern instead. ## Why was this MR needed? There were a couple of bugs: * The global and project-specific issues endpoints wouldn't sort at all. * Group sorting would work, but only if you applied two undocumented workarounds: * Always pass both `order_by` and `sort` (both are optional, so only one should be needed to change ordering). * Instead of passing `created_at` or `updated_at`, you needed to pass `created` or `updated`. This makes the API implementation match the docs. ## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria? - [x] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added - [x] API support added - Tests - [x] Added for this feature/bug - [ ] All builds are passing - [x] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html) - [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides) - [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please) - [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits) ## What are the relevant issue numbers? Closes https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ee/issues/983. See merge request !6281
-
Rémy Coutable authored
Add notification_settings API calls ## What does this MR do? It adds API calls to get/update notification settings, globally and at the group/project level. ## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check? None ## Why was this MR needed? Notification settings were updated, but related API calls were never created. ## What are the relevant issue numbers? gitlab-org/gitlab-ce#19359 ## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria? - [x] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added - [x] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md) - [x] API support added - Tests - [x] Added for this feature/bug - [x] All builds are passing - [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides) - [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please) - [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits) Closes #19359 See merge request !5632
-
- 10 Sep, 2016 2 commits
-
-
Robert Speicher authored
Pull import sources from Gitlab::ImportSources ## What does this MR do? `ApplicationSettings.create_from_defaults` defines an array of import sources, but we should be pulling them from `Gitlab::ImportSources.options` since that's what they're validated against. ## What are the relevant issue numbers? Closes #21814 See merge request !6293
-
Robert Speicher authored
Improve PipelinesFinder spec so that it does not depend on hard-coded database IDs Fixes failed builds such as https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/builds/3919501 See merge request !6291
-
- 09 Sep, 2016 25 commits
-
-
Stan Hu authored
Fixes failed builds such as https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/builds/3919501
-
Robert Speicher authored
Enable pipeline events by default This should probably be included in !5620 but missed. See merge request !6278
-
Robert Speicher authored
Restrict ldap return attributes ## What does this MR do? Fixes the CE part of #13821. We really only ever need uid, dn, cn, and mail attributes, and in some cases, even less. This merge request strips the request down to those four attributes by default, and allows the caller to specify others, if needed. ## Why was this MR needed? This will improve performance especially in cases where the connection is slow between GitLab and LDAP, or when the LDAP object has lots of attributes we don't care about. See merge request !6187
-
Robert Speicher authored
Pass the remember_me option into the u2f form and support it while authenticating ## What does this MR do? Adds remember me support in the u2f authentication, and makes sure the flag gets passed from the login form to the u2f form. Based on the changes for the same thing done for regular 2fa: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/merge_requests/4369 ## Why was this MR needed? The remember me option wasn't working for u2f devices (yubikey) ## What are the relevant issue numbers? Fixes https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/18103 See merge request !5918
-
Robert Speicher authored
Archive CHANGELOG entries prior to 8.0 in CHANGELOGS/archive.md [ci skip] See merge request !6162
-
Robert Speicher authored
See gitlab-org/release-tools!29 [ci skip]
-
Robert Speicher authored
[ci skip]
-
Robert Speicher authored
Hides merge request button on branches page ## What does this MR do? If user does not have the correct permissions, the merge request button is hidden ## What are the relevant issue numbers? Closes #21805 See merge request !6181
-
Drew Blessing authored
-
Marc Siegfriedt authored
Use NotificationSetting::EMAIL_EVENTS for params
-
Robert Speicher authored
Use gitlab-workhorse 0.8.1 Adds Sentry support in gitlab-workhorse. See merge request !6283
-
Rémy Coutable authored
Avoid conflict with Admin labels when importing GitHub labels If the GitHub project have duplicated labels from the Admin labels, the importer will use the Admin label. Fixes #21319 See merge request !6158
-
Ojas Shirekar authored
-
Sean McGivern authored
-
Jacob Vosmaer authored
This adds (basic) Sentry support.
-
Douglas Barbosa Alexandre authored
-
Douglas Barbosa Alexandre authored
-
Jacob Schatz authored
Restore comments lost when converting CoffeeScript to JavaScript ## What does this MR do? Restores comments lost in the great fire of !5464. ## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check? ## Why was this MR needed? #20300 ## What are the relevant issue numbers? - #20300 (comments) - #20098 (ES6) ## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria? - [ ] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added - [ ] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md) - [ ] API support added - Tests - [ ] Added for this feature/bug - [ ] All builds are passing - [ ] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides) - [ ] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please) - [ ] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits) Closes #20300 See merge request !5541
-
Lin Jen-Shin authored
Not sure why I missed this before. I thought I added it.
-
Achilleas Pipinellis authored
Minor update on CI docs examples cc @ayufan @markpundsack Commit message: > Triggered by gitlab-org/gitlab-ci-yml#1 I've investigated how this is organized so far and did a minor clean up. In my opinion we should just keep a list of up to date blog posts in the docs and examples should be included in gitlab-org/gitlab-ci-yml. This reduces the number of projects and docs pages one has to look for information. See merge request !5806
-
Jacob Vosmaer (GitLab) authored
Security and safety improvements for gitlab-workhorse integration Companion to https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-workhorse/merge_requests/60 - Use a custom content type when sending data to gitlab-workhorse - Verify (using JWT and a shared secret on disk) that internal API requests came from gitlab-workhorse This will allow us to build features in gitlab-workhorse that require more trust, and protect us against programming mistakes in the future. This is designed so that no action is required for installations from source. For omnibus-gitlab we need to add code that manages the shared secret. See merge request !5907
-
Rémy Coutable authored
Fix intermittent spec failures with spec/features/issues/user_uses_slash_commands_spec.rb This MR solves the intermittent spec failure: ``` 1) Issues > User uses slash commands behaves like issuable record that supports slash commands in its description and notes note on issue with a note changing the issue's title when current user cannot change title of issue does not reopen the issue Failure/Error: Gitlab::Routing.url_helpers.namespace_project_url(self.namespace, self) ActionController::UrlGenerationError: No route matches {:action=>"show", :controller=>"projects", :id=>#<Project id: 1, name: "project135", path: "gitlabhq", description: nil, created_at: "2016-08-31 20:45:48", updated_at: "2016-08-31 20:45:48", creator_id: 2, issues_enabled: true, merge_requests_enabled: true, wiki_enabled: true, namespace_id: 2, snippets_enabled: true, last_activity_at: "2016-08-31 20:45:48", import_url: nil, visibility_level: 20, archived: false, avatar: nil, import_status: "none", repository_size: 0.0, star_count: 0, import_type: nil, import_source: nil, commit_count: 0, import_error: nil, ci_id: nil, builds_enabled: true, shared_runners_enabled: true, runners_token: "_rNZHgsHzaDWGbyL3L2F", build_coverage_regex: nil, build_allow_git_fetch: true, build_timeout: 3600, pending_delete: false, public_builds: true, pushes_since_gc: 0, last_repository_check_failed: nil, last_repository_check_at: nil, container_registry_enabled: true, only_allow_merge_if_build_succeeds: false, has_external_issue_tracker: false, repository_storage: "default", request_access_enabled: true, has_external_wiki: false, lfs_enabled: nil>, :namespace_id=>nil} missing required keys: [:namespace_id] Shared Example Group: "issuable record that supports slash commands in its description and notes" called from ./spec/features/issues/user_uses_slash_commands_spec.rb:6 # ./app/models/project.rb:611:in `web_url' # ./app/models/project.rb:975:in `hook_attrs' # ./lib/gitlab/data_builder/note.rb:58:in `build_base_data' # ./lib/gitlab/data_builder/note.rb:38:in `build' # ./app/services/notes/post_process_service.rb:19:in `hook_data' # ./app/services/notes/post_process_service.rb:23:in `execute_note_hooks' # ./app/services/notes/post_process_service.rb:14:in `execute' # ./app/workers/new_note_worker.rb:10:in `perform' # ./app/services/notes/create_service.rb:29:in `execute' # ./app/controllers/projects/notes_controller.rb:26:in `create' # ./lib/gitlab/request_profiler/middleware.rb:15:in `call' # ./lib/gitlab/middleware/go.rb:16:in `call' # ./lib/gitlab/middleware/static.rb:9:in `call' ``` There were a number of issues: 1. Sidekiq async tasks were being run after project namespaces were deleted. Use Sidekiq in fake mode to prevent this from Sidekiq tasks from being enqueued in the first place. 2. Some outstanding Ajax requests (e.g. autocomplete) were still being loaded while `DatabaseCleaner` ran 3. `logout` did not always wait for logout actually to complete Closes #21723 See merge request !6271
-
Z.J. van de Weg authored
Triggered by gitlab-org/gitlab-ci-yml#1 I've investigated how this is organized so far and did a minor clean up. In my opinion we should just keep a list of up to date blog posts in the docs and examples should be included in gitlab-org/gitlab-ci-yml. This reduces the number of projects and docs pages one has to look for information. [ci skip]
-
Rémy Coutable authored
Refresh todos count cache when an Issue/MR is deleted Fixes #21714 See merge request !6161
-
Rémy Coutable authored
* Moves splitting of `ps` result to helper. * Users a regexp to extract the different parts The result of `ps` at least depends on the _LANG_ and the distance of _start_ to _now_ (start time then the day + hour then month+day) I've tested with _LANG=en_US.UTF-8_ and _LANG=de_CH.UTF-8_ Closes #20632 See merge request !6245
-
- 08 Sep, 2016 11 commits
-
-
Stan Hu authored
-
Stan Hu authored
-
Stan Hu authored
-
Stan Hu authored
Sidekiq async tasks were being run after project namespaces were deleted. Use Sidekiq in fake mode to prevent this from Sidekiq tasks from being enqueued in the first place. Closes #21723
-
Jared Deckard authored
-
Douglas Barbosa Alexandre authored
-
Douglas Barbosa Alexandre authored
-
Annabel Dunstone Gray authored
Give project selection dropdowns responsive width, long names wrap. ## What does this MR do? Makes two dropdown menus (branch name selector & project selector) wider on larger screens, and allows their contents to wrap. ## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check? Sanity check. ## Why was this MR needed? Considered a regression, as users who relied on long branch names could no longer see them fully. ## Screenshots (if relevant) Before: ![Screen_Shot_2016-08-30_at_2.50.43_PM](/uploads/e0252cb02c5f34f3c777d2d67028042f/Screen_Shot_2016-08-30_at_2.50.43_PM.png) After: ![Screen_Shot_2016-08-30_at_2.49.35_PM](/uploads/b504e0f3e139c85699bc5aafb58199f3/Screen_Shot_2016-08-30_at_2.49.35_PM.png) After (updated after fixes, including project selector): ![Screen_Shot_2016-09-02_at_1.46.53_PM](/uploads/b480fc8193f713ce43518cb83886fd52/Screen_Shot_2016-09-02_at_1.46.53_PM.png) ![Screen_Shot_2016-09-02_at_1.50.26_PM](/uploads/f0d31702668e83e6c0c24782cc43fdbd/Screen_Shot_2016-09-02_at_1.50.26_PM.png) ## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria? - [x] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added - [x] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md) - [x] API support added - Tests - [x] Added for this feature/bug - [x] All builds are passing - [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides) - [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please) - [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits) ## What are the relevant issue numbers? Closes #15633 See merge request !6105
-
Pascal Betz authored
-
Rémy Coutable authored
Smartly calculate real running time and pending time ## What does this MR do? Try to smartly calculate the running time and pending time for pipelines, instead of just use wall clock time from start to end. The algorithm is based on: > Suppose we have A, B, and C jobs: > * A: from 1 to 3 > * B: from 2 to 4 > * C: from 6 to 7 > The processing time should be accumulated from 1 to 4, and 6 to 7, totally 4, excluding retires, and calculate on `%w[success failed running canceled]` jobs (if a job is not finished yet, assume it's `Time.now`) ## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check? I would actually like to test `Gitlab::Ci::PipelineDuration#process_segments`, but it's a private method right now and it's not very convenient to test it. Is there a way to test it without changing the original code too much? Note that I would like to avoid saving merged segments because it's not used and should be garbage collected. ## Screenshots: ![Screen_Shot_2016-09-05_at_6.45.32_PM](/uploads/a82bfaf316661091e383b743a2f11334/Screen_Shot_2016-09-05_at_6.45.32_PM.png) ## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria? - [x] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added - [ ] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md) - Tests - [x] Added for this feature/bug ## What are the relevant issue numbers? Closes #18260, #19804 See merge request !6084
-
Jared Deckard authored
-