- 28 Sep, 2016 2 commits
-
-
Horatiu Eugen Vlad authored
Signed-off-by: Rémy Coutable <remy@rymai.me>
-
Jacob Schatz authored
Changed to v-cloak attr to hash rocket and string 'true' ## What does this MR do? Changed to v-cloak attr to hash rocket and string 'true' ## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check? ## Why was this MR needed? Maybe it's killing `master`?
😕 ## Screenshots (if relevant) ## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria? - [ ] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added - [ ] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md) - [ ] API support added - Tests - [ ] Added for this feature/bug - [ ] All builds are passing - [ ] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html) - [ ] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides) - [ ] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please) - [ ] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits) ## What are the relevant issue numbers? See merge request !6553
-
- 27 Sep, 2016 38 commits
-
-
Jacob Schatz authored
-
Connor Shea authored
-
Luke Bennett authored
-
Jacob Schatz authored
Send ajax request for label update only if they are changed ## What does this MR do? At the moment we send requests to update the labels on issue even if nothing has been changed. This fixes that and only sends requests when something has actually been changed. The code gets the initial selected values based on the inputs & then compares that to the selected values when submitting. If they are equal, then no request is sent. ## What are the relevant issue numbers? Closes #19472 See merge request !5071
-
Yorick Peterse authored
Optimize GitHub importer for speed and memory See merge request !6552
-
Fatih Acet authored
Fix pipelines table headers ## What does this MR do? Removed stages loop for a single 'Stages' header. ## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check? ## Why was this MR needed? The headers were messing the table up. Note the redundant headers and squished cells. ![Screen_Shot_2016-09-27_at_14.40.51](/uploads/331b08c30a4af59cefc460ab4f3c2a61/Screen_Shot_2016-09-27_at_14.40.51.png) ## Screenshots (if relevant) ![Screen_Shot_2016-09-27_at_14.39.04](/uploads/687895e9152d4fe8d8f3bfc1233af39b/Screen_Shot_2016-09-27_at_14.39.04.png) ## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria? - [ ] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added - [ ] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md) - [ ] API support added - Tests - [ ] Added for this feature/bug - [ ] All builds are passing - [ ] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html) - [ ] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides) - [ ] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please) - [ ] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits) ## What are the relevant issue numbers? Closes #22472 See merge request !6542
-
Yorick Peterse authored
Fix IssuesController#show degradation including project on loaded notes See merge request !6540
-
Ahmad Sherif authored
-
Ahmad Sherif authored
-
Ahmad Sherif authored
* No need to re-fetch issues from GH to read their labels, the labels are already there from the index request. * No need to look up labels on the database for every application, so we cache them.
-
Ahmad Sherif authored
This should avoid having large memory growth when importing GitHub repos with lots of resources.
-
Jacob Schatz authored
Add more tests for calendar contribution ## What does this MR do? Add more tests for calendar contribution ## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check? Shouldn't be ## Why was this MR needed? Improve test coverage for calendar ## Screenshots (if relevant) None ## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria? - [ ] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added - Tests - [ ] Added for this feature/bug - [ ] All builds are passing - [ ] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html) - [ ] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides) - [ ] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please) - [ ] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits) ## What are the relevant issue numbers? Closes #22347 See merge request !6421
-
Rémy Coutable authored
Use gitlab-shell v3.6.2 ## What does this MR do? Bump gitlab-shell to v3.6.2 to be able to enable GIT_TRACE_PERFORMANCE output to a log file Relates #22053 See merge request !6367
-
Rémy Coutable authored
Be nice to Docker Clients talking to JWT/auth ## What does this MR do? Makes all errors returned by JWT endpoint to be docker-compatible. Closes https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/22465 See merge request !6536
-
Paco Guzman authored
-
Phil Hughes authored
-
Kamil Trzcinski authored
-
Fatih Acet authored
Fixed issue board label filtering not removing labels ## What does this MR do? When trying to remove a label filter it would actually add it instead making it impossible to remove the label filter without modifying the URL. This fixes that by correctly removing the label from the filter. ## What are the relevant issue numbers? Closes #21417 See merge request !6208
-
Rémy Coutable authored
Fix Import/Export milestone and 1to1 models issue Fix 1to1 relations on project failing to be importing and milestone ordering issue. Fixes https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/22585 See merge request !6521
-
Luke Bennett authored
-
James Lopez authored
-
Robert Speicher authored
Improve how MergeCommit#merge_commit_message builds the message Now a merge request with a blank description will no longer produce a merge commit message like this: ``` Merge branch 'foo' into 'master' Bring the wonders of foo into the world See merge request !7283 ``` What an improvement!
🎉 See merge request !6450 -
Dmitriy Zaporozhets authored
Add organization field to the user profile ## What does this MR do? Add organization field to the user profile ## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check? no ## Why was this MR needed? So we can let users fill organization information separately ## Screenshots (if relevant) ![Screen_Shot_2016-09-26_at_7.32.27_PM](/uploads/d11a9a86aa22227f9c9915d195106c5f/Screen_Shot_2016-09-26_at_7.32.27_PM.png) ## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria? - [x] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added - [x] ~~[Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md)~~ - [x] API support added - Tests - [x] Added for this feature/bug - [x] All builds are passing - [x] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html) - [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides) - [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please) - [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits) ## What are the relevant issue numbers? https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/21903 See merge request !6526
-
Douwe Maan authored
New `Members::ApproveAccessRequestService` Part of #21979. ## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria? - [x] API support added - Tests - [x] Added for this feature/bug - [x] All builds are passing - [ ] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html) - [ ] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides) - [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please) - [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits) See merge request !6266
-
Robert Speicher authored
Now a merge request with a blank description will no longer produce a merge commit message like this: ``` Merge branch 'foo' into 'master' Bring the wonders of foo into the world See merge request !7283 ``` What an improvement!
🎉 -
Douwe Maan authored
Use GitLab Routing helpers for the documentation URL in `LfsHelper` To reduce conflicts from changes introduced in gitlab-org/gitlab-ee!740 https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ee/merge_requests/740#note_15782550 See merge request !6529
-
Dmitriy Zaporozhets authored
Signed-off-by: Dmitriy Zaporozhets <dmitriy.zaporozhets@gmail.com>
-
Douwe Maan authored
-
Douwe Maan authored
-
Dmitriy Zaporozhets authored
* Add newline to user organization spec according to test guide * Remove unnecessary comments from user organization database migration Signed-off-by: Dmitriy Zaporozhets <dmitriy.zaporozhets@gmail.com>
-
Dmitriy Zaporozhets authored
Signed-off-by: Dmitriy Zaporozhets <dmitriy.zaporozhets@gmail.com>
-
Dmitriy Zaporozhets authored
Signed-off-by: Dmitriy Zaporozhets <dmitriy.zaporozhets@gmail.com>
-
Dmitriy Zaporozhets authored
Signed-off-by: Dmitriy Zaporozhets <dmitriy.zaporozhets@gmail.com>
-
Rémy Coutable authored
Remove Sprockets deprecation warning See merge request !6535
-
Fatih Acet authored
Remove inline JavaScript for Search autocomplete ## What does this MR do? Remove inline JavaScript from the search partial for Search autocomplete. ## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check? That this doesn't break anything (it didn't when I tested it!) ## Why was this MR needed? Inline scripts are bad, this removes a few of them. ## What are the relevant issue numbers? #18231 and #19866 ## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria? - Tests - [ ] All builds are passing - [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides) - [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please) - [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits) See merge request !5284
-
Robert Speicher authored
Upgrade unicorn and unicorn-worker-killer. Upgrade unicorn from 4.9.0 to 5.1.0 and unicorn-worker-killer from 0.4.2 to 0.4.4. This includes Rack 2.0 support which is necessary for Rails 5. Changelog for unicorn: http://unicorn.bogomips.org/NEWS.html Changelog for unicorn-worker-killer: https://github.com/kzk/unicorn-worker-killer/blob/bdec225f028d1bda01b5888578c479b0c705f1a8/ChangeLog See merge request !6463
-
Robert Speicher authored
Improve project_with_board factory to create the default lists ## What does this MR do? Create the default lists after creating a project with the `project_with_board` factory. This makes the setup phase on tests be more simpler. ## Why was this MR needed? These two lists are present in every issue board, so we don't have to create them manually in every test. See merge request !6480
-
Z.J. van de Weg authored
-