- 24 Aug, 2011 8 commits
-
-
Łukasz Nowak authored
Certificates to check content are provided inline.
-
Łukasz Nowak authored
Use signature_certificate_list if strings instead of signature_certificate_file. Additionaly simplify backward compatbility: just do not play with it.
-
Łukasz Nowak authored
-
Łukasz Nowak authored
-
Łukasz Nowak authored
-
Łukasz Nowak authored
-
Łukasz Nowak authored
-
Łukasz Nowak authored
-
- 19 Aug, 2011 5 commits
-
-
Łukasz Nowak authored
-
Łukasz Nowak authored
-
Łukasz Nowak authored
-
Łukasz Nowak authored
Use simple download recipe instead of relying on egg downloading.
-
Łukasz Nowak authored
-
- 16 Aug, 2011 3 commits
-
-
Łukasz Nowak authored
In addition comment why it does not work.
-
Łukasz Nowak authored
Instead use provided system level tools to generate keys.
-
Łukasz Nowak authored
-
- 12 Aug, 2011 1 commit
-
-
Lucas Carvalho authored
This reverts commit bfe5fb83.
-
- 11 Aug, 2011 5 commits
-
-
Lucas Carvalho authored
After merging the master branch inside the signature branch of slapos.libnetworkcache it is required to fix some error messages.
-
Łukasz Nowak authored
-
Łukasz Nowak authored
-
Łukasz Nowak authored
Thanks to 4784a35e, which does buildout "patching" procedure in test it is not required to provide testnc.
-
Łukasz Nowak authored
By the way revert "Revert "Revert "Allow to find slapos.libnetworkcache during test.""" (commit 0fbf2ccf ), as it is not required anymore.
-
- 04 Aug, 2011 1 commit
-
-
Lucas Carvalho authored
Whenever special sign ? is found in url analyse it in order to have correct filename. In case of http://host/path/filename/? use "filename" as part to generate filename. This fuzzy logic allows to generate quite sane filenames.
-
- 03 Aug, 2011 3 commits
-
-
Łukasz Nowak authored
-
Lucas Carvalho authored
The changes were made in the previous commit: - 75a7c904
-
Łukasz Nowak authored
-
- 02 Aug, 2011 5 commits
-
-
Lucas Carvalho authored
-
Lucas Carvalho authored
-
Lucas Carvalho authored
We should only create the signature files when it is required, to avoid to have unecessary failures if someone run this test with old version of slapos.libnetworkcache.
-
Lucas Carvalho authored
This reverts commit 01b2ca0a.
-
Lucas Carvalho authored
The slapos.libnetworkcache == 0.2 does not provide the signature script. So, it should not be used if such script is not available.
-
- 28 Jul, 2011 1 commit
-
-
Lucas Carvalho authored
Well, the new version of slapos.libnetworkcache has being developed, and we need to provided backward compatibility to the old versions. So, slapos.buildout must be able to instantiate a NetworkcacheClient object even if an TypeError is raised.
-
- 27 Jul, 2011 5 commits
-
-
Łukasz Nowak authored
As slapos.libnetworkcache development shall be outside on buildout, do not create hard dependency. This reverts commit 4dc2aef8.
-
Łukasz Nowak authored
For now this is the only working way to test buildout with slapos.libnetworkcache. slapos.libnetworkcache development shall be NOT zc.buildout driven. This reverts commit e3345a7a.
-
Łukasz Nowak authored
Doing development of zc.buildout parts which shall depend on slapos.libnetworkcache without ability to develop it locally is nowhere path. This reverts commit bacd2505.
-
Łukasz Nowak authored
Doing development without local slapos.libnetworkcache has no sense.
-
Łukasz Nowak authored
By having newline in interpreter name, z3c.recipe.scripts created bin/\npync file, and such was returned. This lead to returning buildout:bin-directory path, which was killing buildout in next run.
-
- 24 Jul, 2011 3 commits
-
-
Lucas Carvalho authored
-
Lucas Carvalho authored
As described the previous commit: - 5a5bff2f We must use this method to create the required files to test if the signature is working as expected. So, first we create the files...
-
Lucas Carvalho authored
It must be possible to append information on shadir files, it must simulate the real server. Otherwise there is no way to test the behavior using different signatures.
-