multiprocessing does not cope well with terminate() without join() straight
away as it needs to send for example the exit status over a pipe and also the SIGCHLD was interrupting this pipe. Moreover, there was a race condition in the previous code leaving some children left in some cases because some SIGCHLD got lost. Also, ignore further SIGTERM once one has been received to avoid receiving a SIGTERM before putting the result to the queue and interrupting multiprocessing magic. git-svn-id: https://svn.erp5.org/repos/public/erp5/trunk/utils@46025 20353a03-c40f-0410-a6d1-a30d3c3de9de
Showing
Please register or sign in to comment