The positions method is broken, and always has been, at it
depends on a pre-catalog architecture and the post-catalog architecture isn't fully cooked. To get positions, we need to either store the positions during indexing, which is way too expensive, or we need to be able to get to the original text when searching, which we can't do. For now we'll return something bogus, which will make 'near' searches behave effectively as 'and' searches.
Showing
Please register or sign in to comment