Commit 2486337a authored by Daniel Borkmann's avatar Daniel Borkmann Committed by Stephen Hemminger

tc, bpf: make sure relo is in relation with map section

Add a test that symbol from relocation entry is actually related
to map section and bail out with an error message if it's not the
case; in relation to [1].

  [1] https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=26243Signed-off-by: default avatarDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: default avatarAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
parent 4a36b4c2
...@@ -1328,6 +1328,12 @@ static int bpf_apply_relo_data(struct bpf_elf_ctx *ctx, ...@@ -1328,6 +1328,12 @@ static int bpf_apply_relo_data(struct bpf_elf_ctx *ctx,
if (gelf_getsym(ctx->sym_tab, GELF_R_SYM(relo.r_info), &sym) != &sym) if (gelf_getsym(ctx->sym_tab, GELF_R_SYM(relo.r_info), &sym) != &sym)
return -EIO; return -EIO;
if (sym.st_shndx != ctx->sec_maps) {
fprintf(stderr, "ELF contains non-map related relo data in "
"entry %u pointing to section %u! Compiler bug?!\n",
relo_ent, sym.st_shndx);
return -EIO;
}
rmap = sym.st_value / sizeof(struct bpf_elf_map); rmap = sym.st_value / sizeof(struct bpf_elf_map);
if (rmap >= ARRAY_SIZE(ctx->map_fds)) if (rmap >= ARRAY_SIZE(ctx->map_fds))
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment