fsnotify: Add missing annotation for fsnotify_finish_user_wait() and for...

fsnotify: Add missing annotation for fsnotify_finish_user_wait() and for fsnotify_prepare_user_wait()

Sparse reports warnings at fsnotify_prepare_user_wait()
	and at fsnotify_finish_user_wait()

warning: context imbalance in fsnotify_finish_user_wait()
	- wrong count at exit
warning: context imbalance in fsnotify_prepare_user_wait()
	- unexpected unlock

The root cause is the missing annotation at fsnotify_finish_user_wait()
	and at fsnotify_prepare_user_wait()
fsnotify_prepare_user_wait() has an extra annotation __release()
 that only tell Sparse and not GCC to shutdown the warning

Add the missing  __acquires(&fsnotify_mark_srcu) annotation
Add the missing __releases(&fsnotify_mark_srcu) annotation
Add the __release(&fsnotify_mark_srcu) annotation.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200413214240.15245-1-jbi.octave@gmail.comSigned-off-by: Jules Irenge <jbi.octave@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>

fs/notify/mark.c

@@ -325,14 +325,17 @@ static void fsnotify_put_mark_wake(struct fsnotify_mark *mark)
 }
 
 bool fsnotify_prepare_user_wait(struct fsnotify_iter_info *iter_info)
+	__releases(&fsnotify_mark_srcu)
 {
 	int type;
 
 	fsnotify_foreach_obj_type(type) {
 		/* This can fail if mark is being removed */
-		if (!fsnotify_get_mark_safe(iter_info->marks[type]))
+		if (!fsnotify_get_mark_safe(iter_info->marks[type])) {
+			__release(&fsnotify_mark_srcu);
 			goto fail;
 		}
+	}
 
 	/*
 	 * Now that both marks are pinned by refcount in the inode / vfsmount
@@ -350,6 +353,7 @@ bool fsnotify_prepare_user_wait(struct fsnotify_iter_info *iter_info)
 }
 
 void fsnotify_finish_user_wait(struct fsnotify_iter_info *iter_info)
+	__acquires(&fsnotify_mark_srcu)
 {
 	int type;