Commit 03aa6d34 authored by Toshiaki Makita's avatar Toshiaki Makita Committed by David S. Miller

virtio_net: Don't process redirected XDP frames when XDP is disabled

Commit 8dcc5b0a ("virtio_net: fix ndo_xdp_xmit crash towards dev not
ready for XDP") tried to avoid access to unexpected sq while XDP is
disabled, but was not complete.

There was a small window which causes out of bounds sq access in
virtnet_xdp_xmit() while disabling XDP.

An example case of
 - curr_queue_pairs = 6 (2 for SKB and 4 for XDP)
 - online_cpu_num = xdp_queue_paris = 4
when XDP is enabled:

CPU 0                         CPU 1
(Disabling XDP)               (Processing redirected XDP frames)

                              virtnet_xdp_xmit()
virtnet_xdp_set()
 _virtnet_set_queues()
  set curr_queue_pairs (2)
                               check if rq->xdp_prog is not NULL
                               virtnet_xdp_sq(vi)
                                qp = curr_queue_pairs -
                                     xdp_queue_pairs +
                                     smp_processor_id()
                                   = 2 - 4 + 1 = -1
                                sq = &vi->sq[qp] // out of bounds access
  set xdp_queue_pairs (0)
  rq->xdp_prog = NULL

Basically we should not change curr_queue_pairs and xdp_queue_pairs
while someone can read the values. Thus, when disabling XDP, assign NULL
to rq->xdp_prog first, and wait for RCU grace period, then change
xxx_queue_pairs.
Note that we need to keep the current order when enabling XDP though.

- v2: Make rcu_assign_pointer/synchronize_net conditional instead of
      _virtnet_set_queues.

Fixes: 186b3c99 ("virtio-net: support XDP_REDIRECT")
Signed-off-by: default avatarToshiaki Makita <makita.toshiaki@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Acked-by: default avatarJason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Acked-by: default avatarMichael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
parent 1667c08a
......@@ -2410,6 +2410,10 @@ static int virtnet_xdp_set(struct net_device *dev, struct bpf_prog *prog,
return -ENOMEM;
}
old_prog = rtnl_dereference(vi->rq[0].xdp_prog);
if (!prog && !old_prog)
return 0;
if (prog) {
prog = bpf_prog_add(prog, vi->max_queue_pairs - 1);
if (IS_ERR(prog))
......@@ -2424,21 +2428,30 @@ static int virtnet_xdp_set(struct net_device *dev, struct bpf_prog *prog,
}
}
if (!prog) {
for (i = 0; i < vi->max_queue_pairs; i++) {
rcu_assign_pointer(vi->rq[i].xdp_prog, prog);
if (i == 0)
virtnet_restore_guest_offloads(vi);
}
synchronize_net();
}
err = _virtnet_set_queues(vi, curr_qp + xdp_qp);
if (err)
goto err;
netif_set_real_num_rx_queues(dev, curr_qp + xdp_qp);
vi->xdp_queue_pairs = xdp_qp;
if (prog) {
for (i = 0; i < vi->max_queue_pairs; i++) {
old_prog = rtnl_dereference(vi->rq[i].xdp_prog);
rcu_assign_pointer(vi->rq[i].xdp_prog, prog);
if (i == 0) {
if (!old_prog)
if (i == 0 && !old_prog)
virtnet_clear_guest_offloads(vi);
if (!prog)
virtnet_restore_guest_offloads(vi);
}
}
for (i = 0; i < vi->max_queue_pairs; i++) {
if (old_prog)
bpf_prog_put(old_prog);
if (netif_running(dev)) {
......@@ -2451,6 +2464,12 @@ static int virtnet_xdp_set(struct net_device *dev, struct bpf_prog *prog,
return 0;
err:
if (!prog) {
virtnet_clear_guest_offloads(vi);
for (i = 0; i < vi->max_queue_pairs; i++)
rcu_assign_pointer(vi->rq[i].xdp_prog, old_prog);
}
if (netif_running(dev)) {
for (i = 0; i < vi->max_queue_pairs; i++) {
virtnet_napi_enable(vi->rq[i].vq, &vi->rq[i].napi);
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment