Commit 052bc385 authored by Breno Leitao's avatar Breno Leitao Committed by Greg Kroah-Hartman

powerpc/tm: Remove msr_tm_active()

[ Upstream commit 5c784c84 ]

Currently msr_tm_active() is a wrapper around MSR_TM_ACTIVE() if
CONFIG_PPC_TRANSACTIONAL_MEM is set, or it is just a function that
returns false if CONFIG_PPC_TRANSACTIONAL_MEM is not set.

This function is not necessary, since MSR_TM_ACTIVE() just do the same and
could be used, removing the dualism and simplifying the code.

This patchset remove every instance of msr_tm_active() and replaced it
by MSR_TM_ACTIVE().
Signed-off-by: default avatarBreno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarMichael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Signed-off-by: default avatarSasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
parent f193e022
......@@ -118,11 +118,16 @@
#define MSR_TS_S __MASK(MSR_TS_S_LG) /* Transaction Suspended */
#define MSR_TS_T __MASK(MSR_TS_T_LG) /* Transaction Transactional */
#define MSR_TS_MASK (MSR_TS_T | MSR_TS_S) /* Transaction State bits */
#define MSR_TM_ACTIVE(x) (((x) & MSR_TS_MASK) != 0) /* Transaction active? */
#define MSR_TM_RESV(x) (((x) & MSR_TS_MASK) == MSR_TS_MASK) /* Reserved */
#define MSR_TM_TRANSACTIONAL(x) (((x) & MSR_TS_MASK) == MSR_TS_T)
#define MSR_TM_SUSPENDED(x) (((x) & MSR_TS_MASK) == MSR_TS_S)
#ifdef CONFIG_PPC_TRANSACTIONAL_MEM
#define MSR_TM_ACTIVE(x) (((x) & MSR_TS_MASK) != 0) /* Transaction active? */
#else
#define MSR_TM_ACTIVE(x) 0
#endif
#if defined(CONFIG_PPC_BOOK3S_64)
#define MSR_64BIT MSR_SF
......
......@@ -102,24 +102,18 @@ static void check_if_tm_restore_required(struct task_struct *tsk)
}
}
static inline bool msr_tm_active(unsigned long msr)
{
return MSR_TM_ACTIVE(msr);
}
static bool tm_active_with_fp(struct task_struct *tsk)
{
return msr_tm_active(tsk->thread.regs->msr) &&
return MSR_TM_ACTIVE(tsk->thread.regs->msr) &&
(tsk->thread.ckpt_regs.msr & MSR_FP);
}
static bool tm_active_with_altivec(struct task_struct *tsk)
{
return msr_tm_active(tsk->thread.regs->msr) &&
return MSR_TM_ACTIVE(tsk->thread.regs->msr) &&
(tsk->thread.ckpt_regs.msr & MSR_VEC);
}
#else
static inline bool msr_tm_active(unsigned long msr) { return false; }
static inline void check_if_tm_restore_required(struct task_struct *tsk) { }
static inline bool tm_active_with_fp(struct task_struct *tsk) { return false; }
static inline bool tm_active_with_altivec(struct task_struct *tsk) { return false; }
......@@ -247,7 +241,8 @@ void enable_kernel_fp(void)
* giveup as this would save to the 'live' structure not the
* checkpointed structure.
*/
if(!msr_tm_active(cpumsr) && msr_tm_active(current->thread.regs->msr))
if (!MSR_TM_ACTIVE(cpumsr) &&
MSR_TM_ACTIVE(current->thread.regs->msr))
return;
__giveup_fpu(current);
}
......@@ -311,7 +306,8 @@ void enable_kernel_altivec(void)
* giveup as this would save to the 'live' structure not the
* checkpointed structure.
*/
if(!msr_tm_active(cpumsr) && msr_tm_active(current->thread.regs->msr))
if (!MSR_TM_ACTIVE(cpumsr) &&
MSR_TM_ACTIVE(current->thread.regs->msr))
return;
__giveup_altivec(current);
}
......@@ -397,7 +393,8 @@ void enable_kernel_vsx(void)
* giveup as this would save to the 'live' structure not the
* checkpointed structure.
*/
if(!msr_tm_active(cpumsr) && msr_tm_active(current->thread.regs->msr))
if (!MSR_TM_ACTIVE(cpumsr) &&
MSR_TM_ACTIVE(current->thread.regs->msr))
return;
__giveup_vsx(current);
}
......@@ -531,7 +528,7 @@ void restore_math(struct pt_regs *regs)
{
unsigned long msr;
if (!msr_tm_active(regs->msr) &&
if (!MSR_TM_ACTIVE(regs->msr) &&
!current->thread.load_fp && !loadvec(current->thread))
return;
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment