Commit 0816b8c6 authored by Dave Marchevsky's avatar Dave Marchevsky Committed by Alexei Starovoitov

bpf: Consider non-owning refs to refcounted nodes RCU protected

An earlier patch in the series ensures that the underlying memory of
nodes with bpf_refcount - which can have multiple owners - is not reused
until RCU grace period has elapsed. This prevents
use-after-free with non-owning references that may point to
recently-freed memory. While RCU read lock is held, it's safe to
dereference such a non-owning ref, as by definition RCU GP couldn't have
elapsed and therefore underlying memory couldn't have been reused.

From the perspective of verifier "trustedness" non-owning refs to
refcounted nodes are now trusted only in RCU CS and therefore should no
longer pass is_trusted_reg, but rather is_rcu_reg. Let's mark them
MEM_RCU in order to reflect this new state.
Signed-off-by: default avatarDave Marchevsky <davemarchevsky@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230821193311.3290257-6-davemarchevsky@fb.comSigned-off-by: default avatarAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
parent ba2464c8
...@@ -653,7 +653,8 @@ enum bpf_type_flag { ...@@ -653,7 +653,8 @@ enum bpf_type_flag {
MEM_RCU = BIT(13 + BPF_BASE_TYPE_BITS), MEM_RCU = BIT(13 + BPF_BASE_TYPE_BITS),
/* Used to tag PTR_TO_BTF_ID | MEM_ALLOC references which are non-owning. /* Used to tag PTR_TO_BTF_ID | MEM_ALLOC references which are non-owning.
* Currently only valid for linked-list and rbtree nodes. * Currently only valid for linked-list and rbtree nodes. If the nodes
* have a bpf_refcount_field, they must be tagged MEM_RCU as well.
*/ */
NON_OWN_REF = BIT(14 + BPF_BASE_TYPE_BITS), NON_OWN_REF = BIT(14 + BPF_BASE_TYPE_BITS),
......
...@@ -8007,6 +8007,7 @@ int check_func_arg_reg_off(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, ...@@ -8007,6 +8007,7 @@ int check_func_arg_reg_off(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
case PTR_TO_BTF_ID | PTR_TRUSTED: case PTR_TO_BTF_ID | PTR_TRUSTED:
case PTR_TO_BTF_ID | MEM_RCU: case PTR_TO_BTF_ID | MEM_RCU:
case PTR_TO_BTF_ID | MEM_ALLOC | NON_OWN_REF: case PTR_TO_BTF_ID | MEM_ALLOC | NON_OWN_REF:
case PTR_TO_BTF_ID | MEM_ALLOC | NON_OWN_REF | MEM_RCU:
/* When referenced PTR_TO_BTF_ID is passed to release function, /* When referenced PTR_TO_BTF_ID is passed to release function,
* its fixed offset must be 0. In the other cases, fixed offset * its fixed offset must be 0. In the other cases, fixed offset
* can be non-zero. This was already checked above. So pass * can be non-zero. This was already checked above. So pass
...@@ -10473,6 +10474,7 @@ static int process_kf_arg_ptr_to_btf_id(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, ...@@ -10473,6 +10474,7 @@ static int process_kf_arg_ptr_to_btf_id(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
static int ref_set_non_owning(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_reg_state *reg) static int ref_set_non_owning(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_reg_state *reg)
{ {
struct bpf_verifier_state *state = env->cur_state; struct bpf_verifier_state *state = env->cur_state;
struct btf_record *rec = reg_btf_record(reg);
if (!state->active_lock.ptr) { if (!state->active_lock.ptr) {
verbose(env, "verifier internal error: ref_set_non_owning w/o active lock\n"); verbose(env, "verifier internal error: ref_set_non_owning w/o active lock\n");
...@@ -10485,6 +10487,9 @@ static int ref_set_non_owning(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_reg_state ...@@ -10485,6 +10487,9 @@ static int ref_set_non_owning(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_reg_state
} }
reg->type |= NON_OWN_REF; reg->type |= NON_OWN_REF;
if (rec->refcount_off >= 0)
reg->type |= MEM_RCU;
return 0; return 0;
} }
...@@ -11322,6 +11327,11 @@ static int check_kfunc_call(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn, ...@@ -11322,6 +11327,11 @@ static int check_kfunc_call(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn,
struct bpf_func_state *state; struct bpf_func_state *state;
struct bpf_reg_state *reg; struct bpf_reg_state *reg;
if (in_rbtree_lock_required_cb(env) && (rcu_lock || rcu_unlock)) {
verbose(env, "Calling bpf_rcu_read_{lock,unlock} in unnecessary rbtree callback\n");
return -EACCES;
}
if (rcu_lock) { if (rcu_lock) {
verbose(env, "nested rcu read lock (kernel function %s)\n", func_name); verbose(env, "nested rcu read lock (kernel function %s)\n", func_name);
return -EINVAL; return -EINVAL;
...@@ -16684,7 +16694,8 @@ static int do_check(struct bpf_verifier_env *env) ...@@ -16684,7 +16694,8 @@ static int do_check(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
return -EINVAL; return -EINVAL;
} }
if (env->cur_state->active_rcu_lock) { if (env->cur_state->active_rcu_lock &&
!in_rbtree_lock_required_cb(env)) {
verbose(env, "bpf_rcu_read_unlock is missing\n"); verbose(env, "bpf_rcu_read_unlock is missing\n");
return -EINVAL; return -EINVAL;
} }
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment