Commit 09aed8a5 authored by Jinshan Xiong's avatar Jinshan Xiong Committed by Greg Kroah-Hartman

staging/lustre/llite: access layout version under a lock

We used to access layout version under the protection of ldlm
lock, this introduces extra overhead for dlm lock matching.

In this patch, lli_layout_lock is introduced to access the layout
version. Also, when a layout lock is losing, we should tear down
mmap of the correspoding inode to avoid stale data accessing in the
future.

This is part of technical verification of replication.
Signed-off-by: default avatarJinshan Xiong <jinshan.xiong@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.whamcloud.com/8689
Intel-bug-id: https://jira.hpdd.intel.com/browse/LU-3254Reviewed-by: default avatarLai Siyao <lai.siyao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarBobi Jam <bobijam@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarOleg Drokin <oleg.drokin@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
parent 9fc3b028
......@@ -3436,7 +3436,7 @@ static int ll_layout_lock_set(struct lustre_handle *lockh, ldlm_mode_t mode,
if (lvb_ready) {
/* layout_gen must be valid if layout lock is not
* cancelled and stripe has already set */
*gen = lli->lli_layout_gen;
*gen = ll_layout_version_get(lli);
rc = 0;
}
GOTO(out, rc);
......@@ -3534,32 +3534,20 @@ int ll_layout_refresh(struct inode *inode, __u32 *gen)
};
int rc;
*gen = lli->lli_layout_gen;
if (!(sbi->ll_flags & LL_SBI_LAYOUT_LOCK))
*gen = ll_layout_version_get(lli);
if (!(sbi->ll_flags & LL_SBI_LAYOUT_LOCK) || *gen != LL_LAYOUT_GEN_NONE)
return 0;
/* sanity checks */
LASSERT(fid_is_sane(ll_inode2fid(inode)));
LASSERT(S_ISREG(inode->i_mode));
/* mostly layout lock is caching on the local side, so try to match
* it before grabbing layout lock mutex. */
mode = ll_take_md_lock(inode, MDS_INODELOCK_LAYOUT, &lockh, 0,
LCK_CR | LCK_CW | LCK_PR | LCK_PW);
if (mode != 0) { /* hit cached lock */
rc = ll_layout_lock_set(&lockh, mode, inode, gen, false);
if (rc == 0)
return 0;
/* better hold lli_layout_mutex to try again otherwise
* it will have starvation problem. */
}
/* take layout lock mutex to enqueue layout lock exclusively. */
mutex_lock(&lli->lli_layout_mutex);
again:
/* try again. Maybe somebody else has done this. */
/* mostly layout lock is caching on the local side, so try to match
* it before grabbing layout lock mutex. */
mode = ll_take_md_lock(inode, MDS_INODELOCK_LAYOUT, &lockh, 0,
LCK_CR | LCK_CW | LCK_PR | LCK_PW);
if (mode != 0) { /* hit cached lock */
......
......@@ -280,14 +280,33 @@ struct ll_inode_info {
/* mutex to request for layout lock exclusively. */
struct mutex lli_layout_mutex;
/* valid only inside LAYOUT ibits lock, protected by lli_layout_mutex */
/* Layout version, protected by lli_layout_lock */
__u32 lli_layout_gen;
spinlock_t lli_layout_lock;
struct rw_semaphore lli_xattrs_list_rwsem;
struct mutex lli_xattrs_enq_lock;
struct list_head lli_xattrs;/* ll_xattr_entry->xe_list */
};
static inline __u32 ll_layout_version_get(struct ll_inode_info *lli)
{
__u32 gen;
spin_lock(&lli->lli_layout_lock);
gen = lli->lli_layout_gen;
spin_unlock(&lli->lli_layout_lock);
return gen;
}
static inline void ll_layout_version_set(struct ll_inode_info *lli, __u32 gen)
{
spin_lock(&lli->lli_layout_lock);
lli->lli_layout_gen = gen;
spin_unlock(&lli->lli_layout_lock);
}
int ll_xattr_cache_destroy(struct inode *inode);
int ll_xattr_cache_get(struct inode *inode,
......
......@@ -966,7 +966,8 @@ void ll_lli_init(struct ll_inode_info *lli)
mutex_init(&lli->lli_och_mutex);
spin_lock_init(&lli->lli_agl_lock);
lli->lli_has_smd = false;
lli->lli_layout_gen = LL_LAYOUT_GEN_NONE;
spin_lock_init(&lli->lli_layout_lock);
ll_layout_version_set(lli, LL_LAYOUT_GEN_NONE);
lli->lli_clob = NULL;
init_rwsem(&lli->lli_xattrs_list_rwsem);
......
......@@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ static bool can_populate_pages(const struct lu_env *env, struct cl_io *io,
case CIT_WRITE:
/* don't need lock here to check lli_layout_gen as we have held
* extent lock and GROUP lock has to hold to swap layout */
if (lli->lli_layout_gen != cio->cui_layout_gen) {
if (ll_layout_version_get(lli) != cio->cui_layout_gen) {
io->ci_need_restart = 1;
/* this will return application a short read/write */
io->ci_continue = 0;
......
......@@ -126,7 +126,22 @@ int vvp_conf_set(const struct lu_env *env, struct cl_object *obj,
struct ll_inode_info *lli = ll_i2info(conf->coc_inode);
if (conf->coc_opc == OBJECT_CONF_INVALIDATE) {
lli->lli_layout_gen = LL_LAYOUT_GEN_NONE;
CDEBUG(D_VFSTRACE, DFID ": losing layout lock\n",
PFID(&lli->lli_fid));
ll_layout_version_set(lli, LL_LAYOUT_GEN_NONE);
/* Clean up page mmap for this inode.
* The reason for us to do this is that if the page has
* already been installed into memory space, the process
* can access it without interacting with lustre, so this
* page may be stale due to layout change, and the process
* will never be notified.
* This operation is expensive but mmap processes have to pay
* a price themselves. */
unmap_mapping_range(conf->coc_inode->i_mapping,
0, OBD_OBJECT_EOF, 0);
return 0;
}
......@@ -134,18 +149,18 @@ int vvp_conf_set(const struct lu_env *env, struct cl_object *obj,
return 0;
if (conf->u.coc_md != NULL && conf->u.coc_md->lsm != NULL) {
CDEBUG(D_VFSTRACE, "layout lock change: %u -> %u\n",
lli->lli_layout_gen,
CDEBUG(D_VFSTRACE, DFID ": layout version change: %u -> %u\n",
PFID(&lli->lli_fid), lli->lli_layout_gen,
conf->u.coc_md->lsm->lsm_layout_gen);
lli->lli_has_smd = lsm_has_objects(conf->u.coc_md->lsm);
lli->lli_layout_gen = conf->u.coc_md->lsm->lsm_layout_gen;
ll_layout_version_set(lli, conf->u.coc_md->lsm->lsm_layout_gen);
} else {
CDEBUG(D_VFSTRACE, "layout lock destroyed: %u.\n",
lli->lli_layout_gen);
CDEBUG(D_VFSTRACE, DFID ": layout nuked: %u.\n",
PFID(&lli->lli_fid), lli->lli_layout_gen);
lli->lli_has_smd = false;
lli->lli_layout_gen = LL_LAYOUT_GEN_EMPTY;
ll_layout_version_set(lli, LL_LAYOUT_GEN_EMPTY);
}
return 0;
}
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment