Commit 12688dc2 authored by Jarkko Nikula's avatar Jarkko Nikula Committed by Wolfram Sang

Revert "i2c: designware: detect when dynamic tar update is possible"

This reverts commit 63d0f0a6.

It caused a regression on platforms where I2C controller is synthesized
with dynamic TAR update disabled. Detection code is testing is bit
DW_IC_CON_10BITADDR_MASTER in register DW_IC_CON read-only but fails to
restore original value in case bit is read-write.

Instead of fixing this we revert the commit since it was preparation for
the commit 0317e6c0 ("i2c: designware: do not disable adapter after
transfer") which was also reverted.
Reported-by: default avatarShah Nehal-Bakulchandra <Nehal-bakulchandra.Shah@amd.com>
Reported-by: default avatarSuravee Suthikulpanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com>
Acked-By: default avatarLucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v4.9+
Fixes: 63d0f0a6 ("i2c: designware: detect when dynamic tar update is possible")
Signed-off-by: default avatarJarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarWolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
parent 7089db84
...@@ -475,30 +475,28 @@ static int i2c_dw_wait_bus_not_busy(struct dw_i2c_dev *dev) ...@@ -475,30 +475,28 @@ static int i2c_dw_wait_bus_not_busy(struct dw_i2c_dev *dev)
static void i2c_dw_xfer_init(struct dw_i2c_dev *dev) static void i2c_dw_xfer_init(struct dw_i2c_dev *dev)
{ {
struct i2c_msg *msgs = dev->msgs; struct i2c_msg *msgs = dev->msgs;
u32 ic_tar = 0; u32 ic_con, ic_tar = 0;
/* Disable the adapter */ /* Disable the adapter */
__i2c_dw_enable_and_wait(dev, false); __i2c_dw_enable_and_wait(dev, false);
/* if the slave address is ten bit address, enable 10BITADDR */ /* if the slave address is ten bit address, enable 10BITADDR */
if (dev->dynamic_tar_update_enabled) { ic_con = dw_readl(dev, DW_IC_CON);
if (msgs[dev->msg_write_idx].flags & I2C_M_TEN) {
ic_con |= DW_IC_CON_10BITADDR_MASTER;
/* /*
* If I2C_DYNAMIC_TAR_UPDATE is set, the 10-bit addressing * If I2C_DYNAMIC_TAR_UPDATE is set, the 10-bit addressing
* mode has to be enabled via bit 12 of IC_TAR register, * mode has to be enabled via bit 12 of IC_TAR register.
* otherwise bit 4 of IC_CON is used. * We set it always as I2C_DYNAMIC_TAR_UPDATE can't be
* detected from registers.
*/ */
if (msgs[dev->msg_write_idx].flags & I2C_M_TEN)
ic_tar = DW_IC_TAR_10BITADDR_MASTER; ic_tar = DW_IC_TAR_10BITADDR_MASTER;
} else { } else {
u32 ic_con = dw_readl(dev, DW_IC_CON);
if (msgs[dev->msg_write_idx].flags & I2C_M_TEN)
ic_con |= DW_IC_CON_10BITADDR_MASTER;
else
ic_con &= ~DW_IC_CON_10BITADDR_MASTER; ic_con &= ~DW_IC_CON_10BITADDR_MASTER;
dw_writel(dev, ic_con, DW_IC_CON);
} }
dw_writel(dev, ic_con, DW_IC_CON);
/* /*
* Set the slave (target) address and enable 10-bit addressing mode * Set the slave (target) address and enable 10-bit addressing mode
* if applicable. * if applicable.
...@@ -963,7 +961,6 @@ int i2c_dw_probe(struct dw_i2c_dev *dev) ...@@ -963,7 +961,6 @@ int i2c_dw_probe(struct dw_i2c_dev *dev)
{ {
struct i2c_adapter *adap = &dev->adapter; struct i2c_adapter *adap = &dev->adapter;
int r; int r;
u32 reg;
init_completion(&dev->cmd_complete); init_completion(&dev->cmd_complete);
...@@ -971,26 +968,6 @@ int i2c_dw_probe(struct dw_i2c_dev *dev) ...@@ -971,26 +968,6 @@ int i2c_dw_probe(struct dw_i2c_dev *dev)
if (r) if (r)
return r; return r;
r = i2c_dw_acquire_lock(dev);
if (r)
return r;
/*
* Test if dynamic TAR update is enabled in this controller by writing
* to IC_10BITADDR_MASTER field in IC_CON: when it is enabled this
* field is read-only so it should not succeed
*/
reg = dw_readl(dev, DW_IC_CON);
dw_writel(dev, reg ^ DW_IC_CON_10BITADDR_MASTER, DW_IC_CON);
if ((dw_readl(dev, DW_IC_CON) & DW_IC_CON_10BITADDR_MASTER) ==
(reg & DW_IC_CON_10BITADDR_MASTER)) {
dev->dynamic_tar_update_enabled = true;
dev_dbg(dev->dev, "Dynamic TAR update enabled");
}
i2c_dw_release_lock(dev);
snprintf(adap->name, sizeof(adap->name), snprintf(adap->name, sizeof(adap->name),
"Synopsys DesignWare I2C adapter"); "Synopsys DesignWare I2C adapter");
adap->retries = 3; adap->retries = 3;
......
...@@ -125,7 +125,6 @@ struct dw_i2c_dev { ...@@ -125,7 +125,6 @@ struct dw_i2c_dev {
int (*acquire_lock)(struct dw_i2c_dev *dev); int (*acquire_lock)(struct dw_i2c_dev *dev);
void (*release_lock)(struct dw_i2c_dev *dev); void (*release_lock)(struct dw_i2c_dev *dev);
bool pm_runtime_disabled; bool pm_runtime_disabled;
bool dynamic_tar_update_enabled;
}; };
#define ACCESS_SWAP 0x00000001 #define ACCESS_SWAP 0x00000001
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment