btrfs: extend balance filter limit to take minimum and maximum
The 'limit' filter is underdesigned, it should have been a range for [min,max], with some relaxed semantics when one of the bounds is missing. Besides that, using a full u64 for a single value is a waste of bytes. Let's fix both by extending the use of the u64 bytes for the [min,max] range. This can be done in a backward compatible way, the range will be interpreted only if the appropriate flag is set (BTRFS_BALANCE_ARGS_LIMIT_RANGE). Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
Showing
Please register or sign in to comment