Commit 13ca1a1b authored by Alexandru Ardelean's avatar Alexandru Ardelean Committed by Jonathan Cameron

iio: adc: ad9467: return ENODEV vs EINVAL in ad9467_setup()

The proper error code should be ENODEV (vs EINVAL) in case the chip ID
isn't recognized.
Signed-off-by: default avatarAlexandru Ardelean <alexandru.ardelean@analog.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200916082221.72851-1-alexandru.ardelean@analog.comSigned-off-by: default avatarJonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
parent 6026af6a
...@@ -324,7 +324,7 @@ static int ad9467_setup(struct ad9467_state *st, unsigned int chip_id) ...@@ -324,7 +324,7 @@ static int ad9467_setup(struct ad9467_state *st, unsigned int chip_id)
AN877_ADC_OUTPUT_MODE_TWOS_COMPLEMENT; AN877_ADC_OUTPUT_MODE_TWOS_COMPLEMENT;
return 0; return 0;
default: default:
return -EINVAL; return -ENODEV;
} }
} }
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment