mtd: rawnand: marvell: Rename the ->correct() function

There is no correction involved at this point, it is just a matter of
reading registers and checking whether bitflips have occurred or
not. Rename the function to clarify it.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Reviewed-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200424164501.26719-7-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com

drivers/mtd/nand/raw/marvell_nand.c

@@ -932,13 +932,13 @@ static void marvell_nfc_check_empty_chunk(struct nand_chip *chip,
 }
 
 /*
- * Check a chunk is correct or not according to hardware ECC engine.
+ * Check if a chunk is correct or not according to the hardware ECC engine.
  * mtd->ecc_stats.corrected is updated, as well as max_bitflips, however
  * mtd->ecc_stats.failure is not, the function will instead return a non-zero
  * value indicating that a check on the emptyness of the subpage must be
- * performed before declaring the subpage corrupted.
+ * performed before actually declaring the subpage as "corrupted".
  */
-static int marvell_nfc_hw_ecc_correct(struct nand_chip *chip,
+static int marvell_nfc_hw_ecc_check_bitflips(struct nand_chip *chip,
 					     unsigned int *max_bitflips)
 {
 	struct mtd_info *mtd = nand_to_mtd(chip);
@@ -1053,7 +1053,7 @@ static int marvell_nfc_hw_ecc_hmg_read_page(struct nand_chip *chip, u8 *buf,
 	marvell_nfc_enable_hw_ecc(chip);
 	marvell_nfc_hw_ecc_hmg_do_read_page(chip, buf, chip->oob_poi, false,
 					    page);
-	ret = marvell_nfc_hw_ecc_correct(chip, &max_bitflips);
+	ret = marvell_nfc_hw_ecc_check_bitflips(chip, &max_bitflips);
 	marvell_nfc_disable_hw_ecc(chip);
 
 	if (!ret)
@@ -1336,7 +1336,7 @@ static int marvell_nfc_hw_ecc_bch_read_page(struct nand_chip *chip,
 		/* Read the chunk and detect number of bitflips */
 		marvell_nfc_hw_ecc_bch_read_chunk(chip, chunk, data, data_len,
 						  spare, spare_len, page);
-		ret = marvell_nfc_hw_ecc_correct(chip, &max_bitflips);
+		ret = marvell_nfc_hw_ecc_check_bitflips(chip, &max_bitflips);
 		if (ret)
 			failure_mask |= BIT(chunk);
 
@@ -1358,10 +1358,9 @@ static int marvell_nfc_hw_ecc_bch_read_page(struct nand_chip *chip,
 	 */
 
 	/*
-	 * In case there is any subpage read error reported by ->correct(), we
-	 * usually re-read only ECC bytes in raw mode and check if the whole
-	 * page is empty. In this case, it is normal that the ECC check failed
-	 * and we just ignore the error.
+	 * In case there is any subpage read error, we usually re-read only ECC
+	 * bytes in raw mode and check if the whole page is empty. In this case,
+	 * it is normal that the ECC check failed and we just ignore the error.
 	 *
 	 * However, it has been empirically observed that for some layouts (e.g
 	 * 2k page, 8b strength per 512B chunk), the controller tries to correct