Commit 1801f8d9 authored by Andre Guedes's avatar Andre Guedes Committed by Jeff Kirsher

igc: Check __IGC_PTP_TX_IN_PROGRESS instead of ptp_tx_skb

The __IGC_PTP_TX_IN_PROGRESS flag indicates we have a pending Tx
timestamp. In some places, instead of checking that flag, we check
adapter->ptp_tx_skb. This patch fixes those places to use the flag.

Quick note about igc_ptp_tx_hwtstamp() change: when that function is
called, adapter->ptp_tx_skb is expected to be valid always so we
WARN_ON_ONCE() in case it is not.

Quick note about igc_ptp_suspend() change: when suspending, we don't
really need to check if there is a pending timestamp. We can simply
clear it unconditionally.
Signed-off-by: default avatarAndre Guedes <andre.guedes@intel.com>
Tested-by: default avatarAaron Brown <aaron.f.brown@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarJeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>
parent 29b821fe
......@@ -404,9 +404,6 @@ void igc_ptp_tx_hang(struct igc_adapter *adapter)
bool timeout = time_is_before_jiffies(adapter->ptp_tx_start +
IGC_PTP_TX_TIMEOUT);
if (!adapter->ptp_tx_skb)
return;
if (!test_bit(__IGC_PTP_TX_IN_PROGRESS, &adapter->state))
return;
......@@ -435,6 +432,9 @@ static void igc_ptp_tx_hwtstamp(struct igc_adapter *adapter)
struct igc_hw *hw = &adapter->hw;
u64 regval;
if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!skb))
return;
regval = rd32(IGC_TXSTMPL);
regval |= (u64)rd32(IGC_TXSTMPH) << 32;
igc_ptp_systim_to_hwtstamp(adapter, &shhwtstamps, regval);
......@@ -466,7 +466,7 @@ static void igc_ptp_tx_work(struct work_struct *work)
struct igc_hw *hw = &adapter->hw;
u32 tsynctxctl;
if (!adapter->ptp_tx_skb)
if (!test_bit(__IGC_PTP_TX_IN_PROGRESS, &adapter->state))
return;
if (time_is_before_jiffies(adapter->ptp_tx_start +
......@@ -588,11 +588,9 @@ void igc_ptp_suspend(struct igc_adapter *adapter)
return;
cancel_work_sync(&adapter->ptp_tx_work);
if (adapter->ptp_tx_skb) {
dev_kfree_skb_any(adapter->ptp_tx_skb);
adapter->ptp_tx_skb = NULL;
clear_bit_unlock(__IGC_PTP_TX_IN_PROGRESS, &adapter->state);
}
}
/**
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment