KVM: vmx: fix missed cancellation of TSC deadline timer

INFO: rcu_sched detected stalls on CPUs/tasks:
 1-...: (11800 GPs behind) idle=45d/140000000000000/0 softirq=0/0 fqs=21663
 (detected by 0, t=65016 jiffies, g=11500, c=11499, q=719)
Task dump for CPU 1:
qemu-system-x86 R  running task        0  3529   3525 0x00080808
 ffff8802021791a0 ffff880212895040 0000000000000001 00007f1c2c00db40
 ffff8801dd20fcd3 ffffc90002b98000 ffff8801dd20fc88 ffff8801dd20fcf8
 0000000000000286 ffff8801dd2ac538 ffff8801dd20fcc0 ffffffffc06949c9
Call Trace:
? kvm_write_guest_cached+0xb9/0x160 [kvm]
? __delay+0xf/0x20
? wait_lapic_expire+0x14a/0x200 [kvm]
? kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run+0xcbe/0x1b00 [kvm]
? kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run+0xe34/0x1b00 [kvm]
? kvm_vcpu_ioctl+0x2d3/0x7c0 [kvm]
? __fget+0x5/0x210
? do_vfs_ioctl+0x96/0x6a0
? __fget_light+0x2a/0x90
? SyS_ioctl+0x79/0x90
? do_syscall_64+0x7c/0x1e0
? entry_SYSCALL64_slow_path+0x25/0x25

This can be reproduced readily by running a full dynticks guest(since hrtimer
in guest is heavily used) w/ lapic_timer_advance disabled.

If fail to program hardware preemption timer, we will fallback to hrtimer based
method, however, a previous programmed preemption timer miss to cancel in this
scenario which results in one hardware preemption timer and one hrtimer emulated
tsc deadline timer run simultaneously. So sometimes the target guest deadline
tsc is earlier than guest tsc, which leads to the computation in vmx_set_hv_timer
can underflow and cause delta_tsc to be set a huge value, then host soft lockup
as above.

This patch fix it by cancelling the previous programmed preemption timer if there
is once we failed to program the new preemption timer and fallback to hrtimer
based method.

Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@redhat.com>
Cc: Yunhong Jiang <yunhong.jiang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>

arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c

@@ -1366,17 +1366,15 @@ void kvm_lapic_expired_hv_timer(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_lapic_expired_hv_timer);
 
-void kvm_lapic_switch_to_hv_timer(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+static bool start_hv_tscdeadline(struct kvm_lapic *apic)
 {
-	struct kvm_lapic *apic = vcpu->arch.apic;
-
-	WARN_ON(apic->lapic_timer.hv_timer_in_use);
-
-	if (apic_lvtt_tscdeadline(apic) &&
-	    !atomic_read(&apic->lapic_timer.pending)) {
 	u64 tscdeadline = apic->lapic_timer.tscdeadline;
 
-		if (!kvm_x86_ops->set_hv_timer(vcpu, tscdeadline)) {
+	if (atomic_read(&apic->lapic_timer.pending) ||
+		kvm_x86_ops->set_hv_timer(apic->vcpu, tscdeadline)) {
+		if (apic->lapic_timer.hv_timer_in_use)
+			cancel_hv_tscdeadline(apic);
+	} else {
 		apic->lapic_timer.hv_timer_in_use = true;
 		hrtimer_cancel(&apic->lapic_timer.timer);
 
@@ -1384,9 +1382,19 @@ void kvm_lapic_switch_to_hv_timer(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 		if (atomic_read(&apic->lapic_timer.pending))
 			cancel_hv_tscdeadline(apic);
 	}
-		trace_kvm_hv_timer_state(vcpu->vcpu_id,
+	trace_kvm_hv_timer_state(apic->vcpu->vcpu_id,
 			apic->lapic_timer.hv_timer_in_use);
-	}
+	return apic->lapic_timer.hv_timer_in_use;
+}
+
+void kvm_lapic_switch_to_hv_timer(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+{
+	struct kvm_lapic *apic = vcpu->arch.apic;
+
+	WARN_ON(apic->lapic_timer.hv_timer_in_use);
+
+	if (apic_lvtt_tscdeadline(apic))
+		start_hv_tscdeadline(apic);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_lapic_switch_to_hv_timer);
 
@@ -1453,15 +1461,7 @@ static void start_apic_timer(struct kvm_lapic *apic)
 			   ktime_to_ns(ktime_add_ns(now,
 					apic->lapic_timer.period)));
 	} else if (apic_lvtt_tscdeadline(apic)) {
-		/* lapic timer in tsc deadline mode */
-		u64 tscdeadline = apic->lapic_timer.tscdeadline;
-
-		if (kvm_x86_ops->set_hv_timer &&
-		    !kvm_x86_ops->set_hv_timer(apic->vcpu, tscdeadline)) {
-			apic->lapic_timer.hv_timer_in_use = true;
-			trace_kvm_hv_timer_state(apic->vcpu->vcpu_id,
-					apic->lapic_timer.hv_timer_in_use);
-		} else
+		if (!(kvm_x86_ops->set_hv_timer && start_hv_tscdeadline(apic)))
 			start_sw_tscdeadline(apic);
 	}
 }