Commit 219f1d79 authored by Davide Caratti's avatar Davide Caratti Committed by David S. Miller

sk_buff: remove support for csum_bad in sk_buff

This bit was introduced with commit 5a212329 ("net: Support for
csum_bad in skbuff") to reduce the stack workload when processing RX
packets carrying a wrong Internet Checksum. Up to now, only one driver and
GRO core are setting it.
Suggested-by: default avatarTom Herbert <tom@herbertland.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavide Caratti <dcaratti@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
parent b72b5bf6
......@@ -223,7 +223,7 @@ int aq_ring_rx_clean(struct aq_ring_s *self, int *work_done, int budget)
skb->protocol = eth_type_trans(skb, ndev);
if (unlikely(buff->is_cso_err)) {
++self->stats.rx.errors;
__skb_mark_checksum_bad(skb);
skb->ip_summed = CHECKSUM_NONE;
} else {
if (buff->is_ip_cso) {
__skb_incr_checksum_unnecessary(skb);
......
......@@ -2573,9 +2573,7 @@ static inline void skb_gro_incr_csum_unnecessary(struct sk_buff *skb)
if (__skb_gro_checksum_validate_needed(skb, zero_okay, check)) \
__ret = __skb_gro_checksum_validate_complete(skb, \
compute_pseudo(skb, proto)); \
if (__ret) \
__skb_mark_checksum_bad(skb); \
else \
if (!__ret) \
skb_gro_incr_csum_unnecessary(skb); \
__ret; \
})
......
......@@ -685,7 +685,7 @@ struct sk_buff {
__u8 csum_valid:1;
__u8 csum_complete_sw:1;
__u8 csum_level:2;
__u8 csum_bad:1;
__u8 __csum_bad_unused:1; /* one bit hole */
__u8 dst_pending_confirm:1;
#ifdef CONFIG_IPV6_NDISC_NODETYPE
......@@ -3336,21 +3336,6 @@ static inline void __skb_incr_checksum_unnecessary(struct sk_buff *skb)
}
}
static inline void __skb_mark_checksum_bad(struct sk_buff *skb)
{
/* Mark current checksum as bad (typically called from GRO
* path). In the case that ip_summed is CHECKSUM_NONE
* this must be the first checksum encountered in the packet.
* When ip_summed is CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY, this is the first
* checksum after the last one validated. For UDP, a zero
* checksum can not be marked as bad.
*/
if (skb->ip_summed == CHECKSUM_NONE ||
skb->ip_summed == CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY)
skb->csum_bad = 1;
}
/* Check if we need to perform checksum complete validation.
*
* Returns true if checksum complete is needed, false otherwise
......@@ -3404,9 +3389,6 @@ static inline __sum16 __skb_checksum_validate_complete(struct sk_buff *skb,
skb->csum_valid = 1;
return 0;
}
} else if (skb->csum_bad) {
/* ip_summed == CHECKSUM_NONE in this case */
return (__force __sum16)1;
}
skb->csum = psum;
......@@ -3466,8 +3448,7 @@ static inline __wsum null_compute_pseudo(struct sk_buff *skb, int proto)
static inline bool __skb_checksum_convert_check(struct sk_buff *skb)
{
return (skb->ip_summed == CHECKSUM_NONE &&
skb->csum_valid && !skb->csum_bad);
return (skb->ip_summed == CHECKSUM_NONE && skb->csum_valid);
}
static inline void __skb_checksum_convert(struct sk_buff *skb,
......
......@@ -111,7 +111,7 @@ static void nft_reject_br_send_v4_unreach(struct net *net,
__wsum csum;
u8 proto;
if (oldskb->csum_bad || !nft_bridge_iphdr_validate(oldskb))
if (!nft_bridge_iphdr_validate(oldskb))
return;
/* IP header checks: fragment. */
......@@ -226,9 +226,6 @@ static bool reject6_br_csum_ok(struct sk_buff *skb, int hook)
__be16 fo;
u8 proto = ip6h->nexthdr;
if (skb->csum_bad)
return false;
if (skb_csum_unnecessary(skb))
return true;
......
......@@ -4678,9 +4678,6 @@ static enum gro_result dev_gro_receive(struct napi_struct *napi, struct sk_buff
if (netif_elide_gro(skb->dev))
goto normal;
if (skb->csum_bad)
goto normal;
gro_list_prepare(napi, skb);
rcu_read_lock();
......
......@@ -172,7 +172,7 @@ void nf_send_unreach(struct sk_buff *skb_in, int code, int hook)
struct iphdr *iph = ip_hdr(skb_in);
u8 proto;
if (skb_in->csum_bad || iph->frag_off & htons(IP_OFFSET))
if (iph->frag_off & htons(IP_OFFSET))
return;
if (skb_csum_unnecessary(skb_in)) {
......
......@@ -220,9 +220,6 @@ static bool reject6_csum_ok(struct sk_buff *skb, int hook)
__be16 fo;
u8 proto;
if (skb->csum_bad)
return false;
if (skb_csum_unnecessary(skb))
return true;
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment