Commit 2655d57e authored by Paul E. McKenney's avatar Paul E. McKenney

rcu: prevent call_rcu() from diving into rcu core if irqs disabled

This commit marks a first step towards making call_rcu() have
real-time behavior.  If irqs are disabled, don't dive into the
RCU core.  Later on, this new early exit will wake up the
per-CPU kthread, which first must be modified to handle the
cases involving callback storms.
Signed-off-by: default avatarPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarJosh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
parent baa1ae0c
......@@ -1839,6 +1839,13 @@ __call_rcu(struct rcu_head *head, void (*func)(struct rcu_head *rcu),
/* Add the callback to our list. */
*rdp->nxttail[RCU_NEXT_TAIL] = head;
rdp->nxttail[RCU_NEXT_TAIL] = &head->next;
rdp->qlen++;
/* If interrupts were disabled, don't dive into RCU core. */
if (irqs_disabled_flags(flags)) {
local_irq_restore(flags);
return;
}
/*
* Force the grace period if too many callbacks or too long waiting.
......@@ -1847,7 +1854,7 @@ __call_rcu(struct rcu_head *head, void (*func)(struct rcu_head *rcu),
* invoking force_quiescent_state() if the newly enqueued callback
* is the only one waiting for a grace period to complete.
*/
if (unlikely(++rdp->qlen > rdp->qlen_last_fqs_check + qhimark)) {
if (unlikely(rdp->qlen > rdp->qlen_last_fqs_check + qhimark)) {
/* Are we ignoring a completed grace period? */
rcu_process_gp_end(rsp, rdp);
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment