Commit 29dcb570 authored by Chris Wilson's avatar Chris Wilson

drm/i915: Move the hw semaphore initialisation from GEM to the engine

Since we are setting engine local values that are tied to the hardware,
move it out of i915_gem_init_seqno() into the intel_ring_init_seqno()
backend, next to where the other hw semaphore registers are written.

v2: Make the explanatory comment about always resetting the semaphores to
0 irrespective of the value of the reset seqno.
Signed-off-by: default avatarChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1460010558-10705-4-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
parent d04bce48
......@@ -2468,7 +2468,7 @@ i915_gem_init_seqno(struct drm_device *dev, u32 seqno)
{
struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
struct intel_engine_cs *engine;
int ret, j;
int ret;
/* Carefully retire all requests without writing to the rings */
for_each_engine(engine, dev_priv) {
......@@ -2479,13 +2479,9 @@ i915_gem_init_seqno(struct drm_device *dev, u32 seqno)
i915_gem_retire_requests(dev);
/* Finally reset hw state */
for_each_engine(engine, dev_priv) {
for_each_engine(engine, dev_priv)
intel_ring_init_seqno(engine, seqno);
for (j = 0; j < ARRAY_SIZE(engine->semaphore.sync_seqno); j++)
engine->semaphore.sync_seqno[j] = 0;
}
return 0;
}
......
......@@ -2552,14 +2552,25 @@ void intel_ring_init_seqno(struct intel_engine_cs *engine, u32 seqno)
{
struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(engine->dev);
/* Our semaphore implementation is strictly monotonic (i.e. we proceed
* so long as the semaphore value in the register/page is greater
* than the sync value), so whenever we reset the seqno,
* so long as we reset the tracking semaphore value to 0, it will
* always be before the next request's seqno. If we don't reset
* the semaphore value, then when the seqno moves backwards all
* future waits will complete instantly (causing rendering corruption).
*/
if (INTEL_INFO(dev_priv)->gen == 6 || INTEL_INFO(dev_priv)->gen == 7) {
I915_WRITE(RING_SYNC_0(engine->mmio_base), 0);
I915_WRITE(RING_SYNC_1(engine->mmio_base), 0);
if (HAS_VEBOX(dev_priv))
I915_WRITE(RING_SYNC_2(engine->mmio_base), 0);
}
memset(engine->semaphore.sync_seqno, 0,
sizeof(engine->semaphore.sync_seqno));
engine->set_seqno(engine, seqno);
engine->hangcheck.seqno = seqno;
}
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment