Commit 2b4cc3d3 authored by AKASHI Takahiro's avatar AKASHI Takahiro Committed by Tony Nguyen

igc: fix the validation logic for taprio's gate list

The check introduced in the commit a5fd3946 ("igc: Lift TAPRIO schedule
restriction") can detect a false positive error in some corner case.
For instance,
    tc qdisc replace ... taprio num_tc 4
	...
	sched-entry S 0x01 100000	# slot#1
	sched-entry S 0x03 100000	# slot#2
	sched-entry S 0x04 100000	# slot#3
	sched-entry S 0x08 200000	# slot#4
	flags 0x02			# hardware offload

Here the queue#0 (the first queue) is on at the slot#1 and #2,
and off at the slot#3 and #4. Under the current logic, when the slot#4
is examined, validate_schedule() returns *false* since the enablement
count for the queue#0 is two and it is already off at the previous slot
(i.e. #3). But this definition is truely correct.

Let's fix the logic to enforce a strict validation for consecutively-opened
slots.

Fixes: a5fd3946 ("igc: Lift TAPRIO schedule restriction")
Signed-off-by: default avatarAKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Kurt Kanzenbach's avatarKurt Kanzenbach <kurt@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: default avatarVinicius Costa Gomes <vinicius.gomes@intel.com>
Tested-by: default avatarNaama Meir <naamax.meir@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarTony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>
parent 02c83791
......@@ -6010,13 +6010,13 @@ static bool validate_schedule(struct igc_adapter *adapter,
if (e->command != TC_TAPRIO_CMD_SET_GATES)
return false;
for (i = 0; i < adapter->num_tx_queues; i++) {
if (e->gate_mask & BIT(i))
for (i = 0; i < adapter->num_tx_queues; i++)
if (e->gate_mask & BIT(i)) {
queue_uses[i]++;
/* There are limitations: A single queue cannot be
* opened and closed multiple times per cycle unless the
* gate stays open. Check for it.
/* There are limitations: A single queue cannot
* be opened and closed multiple times per cycle
* unless the gate stays open. Check for it.
*/
if (queue_uses[i] > 1 &&
!(prev->gate_mask & BIT(i)))
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment