Commit 2d4293a8 authored by Pratyush Anand's avatar Pratyush Anand Committed by Zefan Li

ftrace: Fix en(dis)able graph caller when en(dis)abling record via sysctl

commit 1619dc3f upstream.

When ftrace is enabled globally through the proc interface, we must check if
ftrace_graph_active is set. If it is set, then we should also pass the
FTRACE_START_FUNC_RET command to ftrace_run_update_code(). Similarly, when
ftrace is disabled globally through the proc interface, we must check if
ftrace_graph_active is set. If it is set, then we should also pass the
FTRACE_STOP_FUNC_RET command to ftrace_run_update_code().

Consider the following situation.

 # echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/ftrace_enabled

After this ftrace_enabled = 0.

 # echo function_graph > /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/current_tracer

Since ftrace_enabled = 0, ftrace_enable_ftrace_graph_caller() is never
called.

 # echo 1 > /proc/sys/kernel/ftrace_enabled

Now ftrace_enabled will be set to true, but still
ftrace_enable_ftrace_graph_caller() will not be called, which is not
desired.

Further if we execute the following after this:
  # echo nop > /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/current_tracer

Now since ftrace_enabled is set it will call
ftrace_disable_ftrace_graph_caller(), which causes a kernel warning on
the ARM platform.

On the ARM platform, when ftrace_enable_ftrace_graph_caller() is called,
it checks whether the old instruction is a nop or not. If it's not a nop,
then it returns an error. If it is a nop then it replaces instruction at
that address with a branch to ftrace_graph_caller.
ftrace_disable_ftrace_graph_caller() behaves just the opposite. Therefore,
if generic ftrace code ever calls either ftrace_enable_ftrace_graph_caller()
or ftrace_disable_ftrace_graph_caller() consecutively two times in a row,
then it will return an error, which will cause the generic ftrace code to
raise a warning.

Note, x86 does not have an issue with this because the architecture
specific code for ftrace_enable_ftrace_graph_caller() and
ftrace_disable_ftrace_graph_caller() does not check the previous state,
and calling either of these functions twice in a row has no ill effect.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/e4fbe64cdac0dd0e86a3bf914b0f83c0b419f146.1425666454.git.panand@redhat.comSigned-off-by: default avatarPratyush Anand <panand@redhat.com>
[
  removed extra if (ftrace_start_up) and defined ftrace_graph_active as 0
  if CONFIG_FUNCTION_GRAPH_TRACER is not set.
]
Signed-off-by: default avatarSteven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
[lizf: Backported to 3.4: adjust context]
Signed-off-by: default avatarZefan Li <lizefan@huawei.com>
parent 2932a0a1
......@@ -1014,6 +1014,12 @@ ftrace_filter_lseek(struct file *file, loff_t offset, int whence)
return ret;
}
#ifdef CONFIG_FUNCTION_GRAPH_TRACER
static int ftrace_graph_active;
#else
# define ftrace_graph_active 0
#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_DYNAMIC_FTRACE
#ifndef CONFIG_FTRACE_MCOUNT_RECORD
......@@ -2056,24 +2062,36 @@ static int ftrace_shutdown(struct ftrace_ops *ops, int command)
static void ftrace_startup_sysctl(void)
{
int command;
if (unlikely(ftrace_disabled))
return;
/* Force update next time */
saved_ftrace_func = NULL;
/* ftrace_start_up is true if we want ftrace running */
if (ftrace_start_up)
ftrace_run_update_code(FTRACE_UPDATE_CALLS);
if (ftrace_start_up) {
command = FTRACE_UPDATE_CALLS;
if (ftrace_graph_active)
command |= FTRACE_START_FUNC_RET;
ftrace_run_update_code(command);
}
}
static void ftrace_shutdown_sysctl(void)
{
int command;
if (unlikely(ftrace_disabled))
return;
/* ftrace_start_up is true if ftrace is running */
if (ftrace_start_up)
ftrace_run_update_code(FTRACE_DISABLE_CALLS);
if (ftrace_start_up) {
command = FTRACE_DISABLE_CALLS;
if (ftrace_graph_active)
command |= FTRACE_STOP_FUNC_RET;
ftrace_run_update_code(command);
}
}
static cycle_t ftrace_update_time;
......@@ -4465,7 +4483,6 @@ ftrace_enable_sysctl(struct ctl_table *table, int write,
#ifdef CONFIG_FUNCTION_GRAPH_TRACER
static int ftrace_graph_active;
static struct notifier_block ftrace_suspend_notifier;
int ftrace_graph_entry_stub(struct ftrace_graph_ent *trace)
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment