Commit 2d892ccd authored by Filipe Manana's avatar Filipe Manana Committed by David Sterba

btrfs: fix NULL pointer dereference after failure to create snapshot

When trying to get a new fs root for a snapshot during the transaction
at transaction.c:create_pending_snapshot(), if btrfs_get_new_fs_root()
fails we leave "pending->snap" pointing to an error pointer, and then
later at ioctl.c:create_snapshot() we dereference that pointer, resulting
in a crash:

  [12264.614689] BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 00000000000007c4
  [12264.615650] #PF: supervisor write access in kernel mode
  [12264.616487] #PF: error_code(0x0002) - not-present page
  [12264.617436] PGD 0 P4D 0
  [12264.618328] Oops: 0002 [#1] PREEMPT SMP DEBUG_PAGEALLOC PTI
  [12264.619150] CPU: 0 PID: 2310635 Comm: fsstress Tainted: G        W         5.9.0-rc3-btrfs-next-67 #1
  [12264.619960] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.13.0-0-gf21b5a4aeb02-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014
  [12264.621769] RIP: 0010:btrfs_mksubvol+0x438/0x4a0 [btrfs]
  [12264.622528] Code: bc ef ff ff (...)
  [12264.624092] RSP: 0018:ffffaa6fc7277cd8 EFLAGS: 00010282
  [12264.624669] RAX: 00000000fffffff4 RBX: ffff9d3e8f151a60 RCX: 0000000000000000
  [12264.625249] RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: ffffffff9d56c9be RDI: fffffffffffffff4
  [12264.625830] RBP: ffff9d3e8f151b48 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
  [12264.626413] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 00000000fffffff4
  [12264.626994] R13: ffff9d3ede380538 R14: ffff9d3ede380500 R15: ffff9d3f61b2eeb8
  [12264.627582] FS:  00007f140d5d8200(0000) GS:ffff9d3fb5e00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
  [12264.628176] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
  [12264.628773] CR2: 00000000000007c4 CR3: 000000020f8e8004 CR4: 00000000003706f0
  [12264.629379] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
  [12264.629994] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
  [12264.630594] Call Trace:
  [12264.631227]  btrfs_mksnapshot+0x7b/0xb0 [btrfs]
  [12264.631840]  __btrfs_ioctl_snap_create+0x16f/0x1a0 [btrfs]
  [12264.632458]  btrfs_ioctl_snap_create_v2+0xb0/0xf0 [btrfs]
  [12264.633078]  btrfs_ioctl+0x1864/0x3130 [btrfs]
  [12264.633689]  ? do_sys_openat2+0x1a7/0x2d0
  [12264.634295]  ? kmem_cache_free+0x147/0x3a0
  [12264.634899]  ? __x64_sys_ioctl+0x83/0xb0
  [12264.635488]  __x64_sys_ioctl+0x83/0xb0
  [12264.636058]  do_syscall_64+0x33/0x80
  [12264.636616]  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9

  (gdb) list *(btrfs_mksubvol+0x438)
  0x7c7b8 is in btrfs_mksubvol (fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:858).
  853		ret = 0;
  854		pending_snapshot->anon_dev = 0;
  855	fail:
  856		/* Prevent double freeing of anon_dev */
  857		if (ret && pending_snapshot->snap)
  858			pending_snapshot->snap->anon_dev = 0;
  859		btrfs_put_root(pending_snapshot->snap);
  860		btrfs_subvolume_release_metadata(root, &pending_snapshot->block_rsv);
  861	free_pending:
  862		if (pending_snapshot->anon_dev)

So fix this by setting "pending->snap" to NULL if we get an error from the
call to btrfs_get_new_fs_root() at transaction.c:create_pending_snapshot().

Fixes: 2dfb1e43 ("btrfs: preallocate anon block device at first phase of snapshot creation")
Signed-off-by: default avatarFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
parent 9e3aa805
...@@ -1636,6 +1636,7 @@ static noinline int create_pending_snapshot(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, ...@@ -1636,6 +1636,7 @@ static noinline int create_pending_snapshot(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
pending->snap = btrfs_get_new_fs_root(fs_info, objectid, pending->anon_dev); pending->snap = btrfs_get_new_fs_root(fs_info, objectid, pending->anon_dev);
if (IS_ERR(pending->snap)) { if (IS_ERR(pending->snap)) {
ret = PTR_ERR(pending->snap); ret = PTR_ERR(pending->snap);
pending->snap = NULL;
btrfs_abort_transaction(trans, ret); btrfs_abort_transaction(trans, ret);
goto fail; goto fail;
} }
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment