kasan: test: improve failure message in KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL()
The KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL() macro currently uses KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ() to compare fail_data.report_expected and fail_data.report_found. This always gave a somewhat useless error message on failure, but the addition of extra compile-time checking with READ_ONCE() has caused it to get much longer, and be truncated before anything useful is displayed. Instead, just check fail_data.report_found by hand (we've just set report_expected to 'true'), and print a better failure message with KUNIT_FAIL(). Because of this, report_expected is no longer used anywhere, and can be removed. Beforehand, a failure in: KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL(test, ((volatile char *)area)[3100]); would have looked like: [22:00:34] [FAILED] vmalloc_oob [22:00:34] # vmalloc_oob: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_kasan.c:991 [22:00:34] Expected ({ do { extern void __compiletime_assert_705(void) __attribute__((__error__("Unsupported access size for {READ,WRITE}_ONCE()."))); if (!((sizeof(fail_data.report_expected) == sizeof(char) || sizeof(fail_data.repp [22:00:34] not ok 45 - vmalloc_oob With this change, it instead looks like: [22:04:04] [FAILED] vmalloc_oob [22:04:04] # vmalloc_oob: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_kasan.c:993 [22:04:04] KASAN failure expected in "((volatile char *)area)[3100]", but none occurred [22:04:04] not ok 45 - vmalloc_oob Also update the example failure in the documentation to reflect this. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210606005531.165954-1-davidgow@google.comSigned-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Reviewed-by: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com> Acked-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Cc: Andrey Ryabinin <ryabinin.a.a@gmail.com> Cc: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> Cc: Daniel Axtens <dja@axtens.net> Cc: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Showing
Please register or sign in to comment