Commit 4493233e authored by Pavel Begunkov's avatar Pavel Begunkov Committed by Jens Axboe

io_uring: hook all linked requests via link_list

Links are created by chaining requests through req->list with an
exception that head uses req->link_list. (e.g. link_list->list->list)
Because of that, io_req_link_next() needs complex splicing to advance.

Link them all through list_list. Also, it seems to be simpler and more
consistent IMHO.
Signed-off-by: default avatarPavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
parent 2e6e1fde
......@@ -916,7 +916,6 @@ static bool io_link_cancel_timeout(struct io_kiocb *req)
static void io_req_link_next(struct io_kiocb *req, struct io_kiocb **nxtptr)
{
struct io_ring_ctx *ctx = req->ctx;
struct io_kiocb *nxt;
bool wake_ev = false;
/* Already got next link */
......@@ -928,24 +927,21 @@ static void io_req_link_next(struct io_kiocb *req, struct io_kiocb **nxtptr)
* potentially happen if the chain is messed up, check to be on the
* safe side.
*/
nxt = list_first_entry_or_null(&req->link_list, struct io_kiocb, list);
while (nxt) {
list_del_init(&nxt->list);
while (!list_empty(&req->link_list)) {
struct io_kiocb *nxt = list_first_entry(&req->link_list,
struct io_kiocb, link_list);
if ((req->flags & REQ_F_LINK_TIMEOUT) &&
(nxt->flags & REQ_F_TIMEOUT)) {
if (unlikely((req->flags & REQ_F_LINK_TIMEOUT) &&
(nxt->flags & REQ_F_TIMEOUT))) {
list_del_init(&nxt->link_list);
wake_ev |= io_link_cancel_timeout(nxt);
nxt = list_first_entry_or_null(&req->link_list,
struct io_kiocb, list);
req->flags &= ~REQ_F_LINK_TIMEOUT;
continue;
}
if (!list_empty(&req->link_list)) {
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&nxt->link_list);
list_splice(&req->link_list, &nxt->link_list);
nxt->flags |= REQ_F_LINK;
}
list_del_init(&req->link_list);
if (!list_empty(&nxt->link_list))
nxt->flags |= REQ_F_LINK;
*nxtptr = nxt;
break;
}
......@@ -961,15 +957,15 @@ static void io_req_link_next(struct io_kiocb *req, struct io_kiocb **nxtptr)
static void io_fail_links(struct io_kiocb *req)
{
struct io_ring_ctx *ctx = req->ctx;
struct io_kiocb *link;
unsigned long flags;
spin_lock_irqsave(&ctx->completion_lock, flags);
while (!list_empty(&req->link_list)) {
link = list_first_entry(&req->link_list, struct io_kiocb, list);
list_del_init(&link->list);
struct io_kiocb *link = list_first_entry(&req->link_list,
struct io_kiocb, link_list);
list_del_init(&link->link_list);
trace_io_uring_fail_link(req, link);
if ((req->flags & REQ_F_LINK_TIMEOUT) &&
......@@ -3170,10 +3166,11 @@ static enum hrtimer_restart io_link_timeout_fn(struct hrtimer *timer)
* We don't expect the list to be empty, that will only happen if we
* race with the completion of the linked work.
*/
if (!list_empty(&req->list)) {
prev = list_entry(req->list.prev, struct io_kiocb, link_list);
if (!list_empty(&req->link_list)) {
prev = list_entry(req->link_list.prev, struct io_kiocb,
link_list);
if (refcount_inc_not_zero(&prev->refs)) {
list_del_init(&req->list);
list_del_init(&req->link_list);
prev->flags &= ~REQ_F_LINK_TIMEOUT;
} else
prev = NULL;
......@@ -3203,7 +3200,7 @@ static void io_queue_linked_timeout(struct io_kiocb *req)
* we got a chance to setup the timer
*/
spin_lock_irq(&ctx->completion_lock);
if (!list_empty(&req->list)) {
if (!list_empty(&req->link_list)) {
struct io_timeout_data *data = &req->io->timeout;
data->timer.function = io_link_timeout_fn;
......@@ -3223,7 +3220,8 @@ static struct io_kiocb *io_prep_linked_timeout(struct io_kiocb *req)
if (!(req->flags & REQ_F_LINK))
return NULL;
nxt = list_first_entry_or_null(&req->link_list, struct io_kiocb, list);
nxt = list_first_entry_or_null(&req->link_list, struct io_kiocb,
link_list);
if (!nxt || nxt->sqe->opcode != IORING_OP_LINK_TIMEOUT)
return NULL;
......@@ -3364,7 +3362,7 @@ static bool io_submit_sqe(struct io_kiocb *req, struct io_submit_state *state,
goto err_req;
}
trace_io_uring_link(ctx, req, prev);
list_add_tail(&req->list, &prev->link_list);
list_add_tail(&req->link_list, &prev->link_list);
} else if (req->sqe->flags & IOSQE_IO_LINK) {
req->flags |= REQ_F_LINK;
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment