Commit 4585fc59 authored by Masayoshi Mizuma's avatar Masayoshi Mizuma Committed by Will Deacon

arm64/sve: Fix wrong free for task->thread.sve_state

The system which has SVE feature crashed because of
the memory pointed by task->thread.sve_state was destroyed
by someone.

That is because sve_state is freed while the forking the
child process. The child process has the pointer of sve_state
which is same as the parent's because the child's task_struct
is copied from the parent's one. If the copy_process()
fails as an error on somewhere, for example, copy_creds(),
then the sve_state is freed even if the parent is alive.
The flow is as follows.

copy_process
        p = dup_task_struct
            => arch_dup_task_struct
                *dst = *src;  // copy the entire region.
:
        retval = copy_creds
        if (retval < 0)
                goto bad_fork_free;
:
bad_fork_free:
...
        delayed_free_task(p);
          => free_task
             => arch_release_task_struct
                => fpsimd_release_task
                   => __sve_free
                      => kfree(task->thread.sve_state);
                         // free the parent's sve_state

Move child's sve_state = NULL and clearing TIF_SVE flag
to arch_dup_task_struct() so that the child doesn't free the
parent's one.
There is no need to wait until copy_process() to clear TIF_SVE for
dst, because the thread flags for dst are initialized already by
copying the src task_struct.
This change simplifies the code, so get rid of comments that are no
longer needed.

As a note, arm64 used to have thread_info on the stack. So it
would not be possible to clear TIF_SVE until the stack is initialized.
From commit c02433dd ("arm64: split thread_info from task stack"),
the thread_info is part of the task, so it should be valid to modify
the flag from arch_dup_task_struct().

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.15.x-
Fixes: bc0ee476 ("arm64/sve: Core task context handling")
Signed-off-by: default avatarMasayoshi Mizuma <m.mizuma@jp.fujitsu.com>
Reported-by: default avatarHidetoshi Seto <seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com>
Suggested-by: default avatarDave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarDave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>
Tested-by: default avatarJulien Grall <julien.grall@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarWill Deacon <will@kernel.org>
parent 7a292b6c
......@@ -332,22 +332,27 @@ void arch_release_task_struct(struct task_struct *tsk)
fpsimd_release_task(tsk);
}
/*
* src and dst may temporarily have aliased sve_state after task_struct
* is copied. We cannot fix this properly here, because src may have
* live SVE state and dst's thread_info may not exist yet, so tweaking
* either src's or dst's TIF_SVE is not safe.
*
* The unaliasing is done in copy_thread() instead. This works because
* dst is not schedulable or traceable until both of these functions
* have been called.
*/
int arch_dup_task_struct(struct task_struct *dst, struct task_struct *src)
{
if (current->mm)
fpsimd_preserve_current_state();
*dst = *src;
/* We rely on the above assignment to initialize dst's thread_flags: */
BUILD_BUG_ON(!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_THREAD_INFO_IN_TASK));
/*
* Detach src's sve_state (if any) from dst so that it does not
* get erroneously used or freed prematurely. dst's sve_state
* will be allocated on demand later on if dst uses SVE.
* For consistency, also clear TIF_SVE here: this could be done
* later in copy_process(), but to avoid tripping up future
* maintainers it is best not to leave TIF_SVE and sve_state in
* an inconsistent state, even temporarily.
*/
dst->thread.sve_state = NULL;
clear_tsk_thread_flag(dst, TIF_SVE);
return 0;
}
......@@ -360,13 +365,6 @@ int copy_thread(unsigned long clone_flags, unsigned long stack_start,
memset(&p->thread.cpu_context, 0, sizeof(struct cpu_context));
/*
* Unalias p->thread.sve_state (if any) from the parent task
* and disable discard SVE state for p:
*/
clear_tsk_thread_flag(p, TIF_SVE);
p->thread.sve_state = NULL;
/*
* In case p was allocated the same task_struct pointer as some
* other recently-exited task, make sure p is disassociated from
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment