Commit 46a525e1 authored by Jens Axboe's avatar Jens Axboe

io_uring: don't gate task_work run on TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL

This isn't a reliable mechanism to tell if we have task_work pending, we
really should be looking at whether we have any items queued. This is
problematic if forward progress is gated on running said task_work. One
such example is reading from a pipe, where the write side has been closed
right before the read is started. The fput() of the file queues TWA_RESUME
task_work, and we need that task_work to be run before ->release() is
called for the pipe. If ->release() isn't called, then the read will sit
forever waiting on data that will never arise.

Fix this by io_run_task_work() so it checks if we have task_work pending
rather than rely on TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL for that. The latter obviously
doesn't work for task_work that is queued without TWA_SIGNAL.
Reported-by: default avatarChristiano Haesbaert <haesbaert@haesbaert.org>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://github.com/axboe/liburing/issues/665Signed-off-by: default avatarJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
parent b000145e
...@@ -231,10 +231,10 @@ static inline unsigned int io_sqring_entries(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx) ...@@ -231,10 +231,10 @@ static inline unsigned int io_sqring_entries(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx)
static inline int io_run_task_work(void) static inline int io_run_task_work(void)
{ {
if (test_thread_flag(TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL)) { if (task_work_pending(current)) {
__set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING); if (test_thread_flag(TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL))
clear_notify_signal(); clear_notify_signal();
if (task_work_pending(current)) __set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
task_work_run(); task_work_run();
return 1; return 1;
} }
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment