Commit 46a576a9 authored by Michal Kubeček's avatar Michal Kubeček Committed by Luis Henriques

ipv6: fix ECMP route replacement

commit 27596472 upstream.

When replacing an IPv6 multipath route with "ip route replace", i.e.
NLM_F_CREATE | NLM_F_REPLACE, fib6_add_rt2node() replaces only first
matching route without fixing its siblings, resulting in corrupted
siblings linked list; removing one of the siblings can then end in an
infinite loop.

IPv6 ECMP implementation is a bit different from IPv4 so that route
replacement cannot work in exactly the same way. This should be a
reasonable approximation:

1. If the new route is ECMP-able and there is a matching ECMP-able one
already, replace it and all its siblings (if any).

2. If the new route is ECMP-able and no matching ECMP-able route exists,
replace first matching non-ECMP-able (if any) or just add the new one.

3. If the new route is not ECMP-able, replace first matching
non-ECMP-able route (if any) or add the new route.

We also need to remove the NLM_F_REPLACE flag after replacing old
route(s) by first nexthop of an ECMP route so that each subsequent
nexthop does not replace previous one.

Fixes: 51ebd318 ("ipv6: add support of equal cost multipath (ECMP)")
Signed-off-by: default avatarMichal Kubecek <mkubecek@suse.cz>
Acked-by: default avatarNicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: default avatarLuis Henriques <luis.henriques@canonical.com>
parent 8cdf6815
......@@ -694,6 +694,7 @@ static int fib6_add_rt2node(struct fib6_node *fn, struct rt6_info *rt,
{
struct rt6_info *iter = NULL;
struct rt6_info **ins;
struct rt6_info **fallback_ins = NULL;
int replace = (info->nlh &&
(info->nlh->nlmsg_flags & NLM_F_REPLACE));
int add = (!info->nlh ||
......@@ -717,9 +718,14 @@ static int fib6_add_rt2node(struct fib6_node *fn, struct rt6_info *rt,
(info->nlh->nlmsg_flags & NLM_F_EXCL))
return -EEXIST;
if (replace) {
if (rt_can_ecmp == rt6_qualify_for_ecmp(iter)) {
found++;
break;
}
if (rt_can_ecmp)
fallback_ins = fallback_ins ?: ins;
goto next_iter;
}
if (iter->dst.dev == rt->dst.dev &&
iter->rt6i_idev == rt->rt6i_idev &&
......@@ -754,9 +760,17 @@ static int fib6_add_rt2node(struct fib6_node *fn, struct rt6_info *rt,
if (iter->rt6i_metric > rt->rt6i_metric)
break;
next_iter:
ins = &iter->dst.rt6_next;
}
if (fallback_ins && !found) {
/* No ECMP-able route found, replace first non-ECMP one */
ins = fallback_ins;
iter = *ins;
found++;
}
/* Reset round-robin state, if necessary */
if (ins == &fn->leaf)
fn->rr_ptr = NULL;
......@@ -817,6 +831,8 @@ static int fib6_add_rt2node(struct fib6_node *fn, struct rt6_info *rt,
}
} else {
int nsiblings;
if (!found) {
if (add)
goto add;
......@@ -837,8 +853,27 @@ static int fib6_add_rt2node(struct fib6_node *fn, struct rt6_info *rt,
info->nl_net->ipv6.rt6_stats->fib_route_nodes++;
fn->fn_flags |= RTN_RTINFO;
}
nsiblings = iter->rt6i_nsiblings;
fib6_purge_rt(iter, fn, info->nl_net);
rt6_release(iter);
if (nsiblings) {
/* Replacing an ECMP route, remove all siblings */
ins = &rt->dst.rt6_next;
iter = *ins;
while (iter) {
if (rt6_qualify_for_ecmp(iter)) {
*ins = iter->dst.rt6_next;
fib6_purge_rt(iter, fn, info->nl_net);
rt6_release(iter);
nsiblings--;
} else {
ins = &iter->dst.rt6_next;
}
iter = *ins;
}
WARN_ON(nsiblings != 0);
}
}
return 0;
......
......@@ -2469,11 +2469,14 @@ static int ip6_route_multipath(struct fib6_config *cfg, int add)
}
}
/* Because each route is added like a single route we remove
* this flag after the first nexthop (if there is a collision,
* we have already fail to add the first nexthop:
* fib6_add_rt2node() has reject it).
* these flags after the first nexthop: if there is a collision,
* we have already failed to add the first nexthop:
* fib6_add_rt2node() has rejected it; when replacing, old
* nexthops have been replaced by first new, the rest should
* be added to it.
*/
cfg->fc_nlinfo.nlh->nlmsg_flags &= ~NLM_F_EXCL;
cfg->fc_nlinfo.nlh->nlmsg_flags &= ~(NLM_F_EXCL |
NLM_F_REPLACE);
rtnh = rtnh_next(rtnh, &remaining);
}
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment