Commit 471bec68 authored by Pavel Skripkin's avatar Pavel Skripkin Committed by Mauro Carvalho Chehab

media: pvrusb2: fix array-index-out-of-bounds in pvr2_i2c_core_init

Syzbot reported that -1 is used as array index. The problem was in
missing validation check.

hdw->unit_number is initialized with -1 and then if init table walk fails
this value remains unchanged. Since code blindly uses this member for
array indexing adding sanity check is the easiest fix for that.

hdw->workpoll initialization moved upper to prevent warning in
__flush_work.

Reported-and-tested-by: syzbot+1a247e36149ffd709a9b@syzkaller.appspotmail.com

Fixes: d855497e ("V4L/DVB (4228a): pvrusb2 to kernel 2.6.18")
Signed-off-by: default avatarPavel Skripkin <paskripkin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarHans Verkuil <hverkuil-cisco@xs4all.nl>
Signed-off-by: default avatarMauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>
parent 6b124062
...@@ -2569,6 +2569,11 @@ struct pvr2_hdw *pvr2_hdw_create(struct usb_interface *intf, ...@@ -2569,6 +2569,11 @@ struct pvr2_hdw *pvr2_hdw_create(struct usb_interface *intf,
} while (0); } while (0);
mutex_unlock(&pvr2_unit_mtx); mutex_unlock(&pvr2_unit_mtx);
INIT_WORK(&hdw->workpoll, pvr2_hdw_worker_poll);
if (hdw->unit_number == -1)
goto fail;
cnt1 = 0; cnt1 = 0;
cnt2 = scnprintf(hdw->name+cnt1,sizeof(hdw->name)-cnt1,"pvrusb2"); cnt2 = scnprintf(hdw->name+cnt1,sizeof(hdw->name)-cnt1,"pvrusb2");
cnt1 += cnt2; cnt1 += cnt2;
...@@ -2580,8 +2585,6 @@ struct pvr2_hdw *pvr2_hdw_create(struct usb_interface *intf, ...@@ -2580,8 +2585,6 @@ struct pvr2_hdw *pvr2_hdw_create(struct usb_interface *intf,
if (cnt1 >= sizeof(hdw->name)) cnt1 = sizeof(hdw->name)-1; if (cnt1 >= sizeof(hdw->name)) cnt1 = sizeof(hdw->name)-1;
hdw->name[cnt1] = 0; hdw->name[cnt1] = 0;
INIT_WORK(&hdw->workpoll,pvr2_hdw_worker_poll);
pvr2_trace(PVR2_TRACE_INIT,"Driver unit number is %d, name is %s", pvr2_trace(PVR2_TRACE_INIT,"Driver unit number is %d, name is %s",
hdw->unit_number,hdw->name); hdw->unit_number,hdw->name);
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment